Abdullah Sindi, Luluh Alsughayer, Abdulrahman Almutairi, Zahra Almoume, Nasser Almutairi, Waleed Alshareef, Ahmed Al-Ammar
{"title":"内窥镜下环状后裂术中球囊辅助放置肋骨移植物一项新技术。","authors":"Abdullah Sindi, Luluh Alsughayer, Abdulrahman Almutairi, Zahra Almoume, Nasser Almutairi, Waleed Alshareef, Ahmed Al-Ammar","doi":"10.1007/s00405-025-09220-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to compare the outcomes of balloon-assisted rib graft placement with traditional graft placement in Endoscopic Posterior Cricoid Split with Rib Graft Placement (EPCS/RG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 23 patients who underwent EPCS/RG by a single senior surgeon at King Saud University Medical City from 2017 to 2024. Data were collected on demographics, surgical approach, and operative time. Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables, with significance set at p-value < 0.05. Univariate binary regression was reported as Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 23 cases, 16 (69.5%) utilized the balloon-assisted technique. Age ranged from 8 months to 19 years (median age 10 years). Older age was significantly associated with the balloon-assisted technique (OR 1.627, p-value 0.022). Balloon-assisted cases demonstrated longer split lengths and graft widths, though data limitations hindered definitive conclusions. Tracheostomy was avoided in 65.2% of cases. The operative duration averaged 240 min, showing no significant difference between balloon-assisted or the standard techniques (OR 1.015, CI 0.993-1.038, p-value 0.177).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Balloon-assisted rib graft placement in EPCS/RG facilitates surgical approach, particularly in older patients. It does not extend operative duration, offering a promising advancement in airway surgery.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3.</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"2649-2654"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balloon-assisted placement of rib graft in endoscopic posterior cricoid split; a new technique.\",\"authors\":\"Abdullah Sindi, Luluh Alsughayer, Abdulrahman Almutairi, Zahra Almoume, Nasser Almutairi, Waleed Alshareef, Ahmed Al-Ammar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00405-025-09220-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to compare the outcomes of balloon-assisted rib graft placement with traditional graft placement in Endoscopic Posterior Cricoid Split with Rib Graft Placement (EPCS/RG).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 23 patients who underwent EPCS/RG by a single senior surgeon at King Saud University Medical City from 2017 to 2024. Data were collected on demographics, surgical approach, and operative time. Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables, with significance set at p-value < 0.05. Univariate binary regression was reported as Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 23 cases, 16 (69.5%) utilized the balloon-assisted technique. Age ranged from 8 months to 19 years (median age 10 years). Older age was significantly associated with the balloon-assisted technique (OR 1.627, p-value 0.022). Balloon-assisted cases demonstrated longer split lengths and graft widths, though data limitations hindered definitive conclusions. Tracheostomy was avoided in 65.2% of cases. The operative duration averaged 240 min, showing no significant difference between balloon-assisted or the standard techniques (OR 1.015, CI 0.993-1.038, p-value 0.177).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Balloon-assisted rib graft placement in EPCS/RG facilitates surgical approach, particularly in older patients. It does not extend operative duration, offering a promising advancement in airway surgery.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level 3.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2649-2654\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09220-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-025-09220-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究旨在比较球囊辅助肋骨植入与传统植骨植入在内镜下环状环后裂肋骨植入(EPCS/RG)中的效果。方法:回顾性分析2017年至2024年在沙特国王大学医学城由一名高级外科医生进行EPCS/RG手术的23例患者。收集了人口统计学、手术入路和手术时间的数据。统计分析包括连续变量的Mann-Whitney U检验和分类变量的Fisher精确检验,显著性设置为p值。结果:在23例中,16例(69.5%)使用了气球辅助技术。年龄范围从8个月到19岁(中位年龄10岁)。年龄越大与球囊辅助技术相关(OR为1.627,p值为0.022)。气球辅助的病例显示出更长的分裂长度和移植物宽度,尽管数据限制阻碍了明确的结论。65.2%的病例避免气管切开术。手术时间平均为240 min,与球囊辅助技术和标准技术相比无显著差异(or 1.015, CI 0.993-1.038, p值0.177)。结论:在EPCS/RG中,气球辅助肋骨移植物放置有利于手术入路,特别是对老年患者。它不会延长手术时间,为气道手术提供了一个有希望的进步。证据等级:三级。
Balloon-assisted placement of rib graft in endoscopic posterior cricoid split; a new technique.
Objective: This study aims to compare the outcomes of balloon-assisted rib graft placement with traditional graft placement in Endoscopic Posterior Cricoid Split with Rib Graft Placement (EPCS/RG).
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 23 patients who underwent EPCS/RG by a single senior surgeon at King Saud University Medical City from 2017 to 2024. Data were collected on demographics, surgical approach, and operative time. Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U tests for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables, with significance set at p-value < 0.05. Univariate binary regression was reported as Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI).
Results: Of the 23 cases, 16 (69.5%) utilized the balloon-assisted technique. Age ranged from 8 months to 19 years (median age 10 years). Older age was significantly associated with the balloon-assisted technique (OR 1.627, p-value 0.022). Balloon-assisted cases demonstrated longer split lengths and graft widths, though data limitations hindered definitive conclusions. Tracheostomy was avoided in 65.2% of cases. The operative duration averaged 240 min, showing no significant difference between balloon-assisted or the standard techniques (OR 1.015, CI 0.993-1.038, p-value 0.177).
Conclusion: Balloon-assisted rib graft placement in EPCS/RG facilitates surgical approach, particularly in older patients. It does not extend operative duration, offering a promising advancement in airway surgery.
期刊介绍:
Official Journal of
European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board
Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery
"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level.
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.