剖宫产术后皮肤闭合方法并发症及手术效果比较。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Daniel Gabbai, Chen Jacoby, Itamar Gilboa, Sharon Maslovitz, Yariv Yogev, Emmanuel Attali
{"title":"剖宫产术后皮肤闭合方法并发症及手术效果比较。","authors":"Daniel Gabbai, Chen Jacoby, Itamar Gilboa, Sharon Maslovitz, Yariv Yogev, Emmanuel Attali","doi":"10.1007/s00404-024-07911-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess the impact of absorbable subcutaneous staples for skin closure in cesarean delivery (CD) on maternal morbidity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single tertiary university-affiliated medical center between January 2011 and April 2022. In 2020, a new technique involving absorbable subcutaneous staples for skin closure in CD was introduced. We compared surgical outcomes among three groups: non-absorbable staples, absorbable subcutaneous staples, and absorbable subcutaneous sutures. Data were compared between the three groups and demographic, obstetric, and surgical characteristics were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 31,660 CDs were performed in our center. The data of 31,419 CDs were available for analysis. Absorbable subcutaneous staples were associated with a significantly shorter surgery time in comparison to non-absorbable staples and sutures (52 min vs 53 min vs 60 min, p < 0.001). No differences were found in rates of wound infections or any surgical site surgery in the 45 days following CD. In a multivariate analysis: the use of absorbable subcutaneous staples was associated with a significantly lower risk for prolonged hospitalization > 5 days (OR 0.6, p < 0.001) and re-admission within 45 days (OR 0.8, p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of absorbable subcutaneous staples for skin closure during CD is associated with shorter surgery times and a lower risk of prolonged hospitalization and readmission within 45 days.</p>","PeriodicalId":8330,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of complications and surgery outcomes in skin closure methods following cesarean sections.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Gabbai, Chen Jacoby, Itamar Gilboa, Sharon Maslovitz, Yariv Yogev, Emmanuel Attali\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00404-024-07911-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess the impact of absorbable subcutaneous staples for skin closure in cesarean delivery (CD) on maternal morbidity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single tertiary university-affiliated medical center between January 2011 and April 2022. In 2020, a new technique involving absorbable subcutaneous staples for skin closure in CD was introduced. We compared surgical outcomes among three groups: non-absorbable staples, absorbable subcutaneous staples, and absorbable subcutaneous sutures. Data were compared between the three groups and demographic, obstetric, and surgical characteristics were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 31,660 CDs were performed in our center. The data of 31,419 CDs were available for analysis. Absorbable subcutaneous staples were associated with a significantly shorter surgery time in comparison to non-absorbable staples and sutures (52 min vs 53 min vs 60 min, p < 0.001). No differences were found in rates of wound infections or any surgical site surgery in the 45 days following CD. In a multivariate analysis: the use of absorbable subcutaneous staples was associated with a significantly lower risk for prolonged hospitalization > 5 days (OR 0.6, p < 0.001) and re-admission within 45 days (OR 0.8, p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of absorbable subcutaneous staples for skin closure during CD is associated with shorter surgery times and a lower risk of prolonged hospitalization and readmission within 45 days.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07911-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-024-07911-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估可吸收性皮下钉用于剖宫产(CD)皮肤闭合对产妇发病率的影响。方法:回顾性队列研究于2011年1月至2022年4月在一所高等院校附属医疗中心进行。2020年,引入了一种涉及可吸收皮下钉的新技术,用于CD患者的皮肤闭合。我们比较了三组的手术结果:不可吸收的钉、可吸收的皮下钉和可吸收的皮下缝合线。比较三组数据,并采用单因素和多因素分析分析人口统计学、产科和外科特征。结果:在研究期间,我们中心共进行了31,660例cd检查。31419张cd的数据可供分析。与不可吸收的钉和缝合线相比,可吸收的皮下钉与更短的手术时间相关(52分钟vs 53分钟vs 60分钟,p 5天)(OR 0.6, p)结论:在CD期间使用可吸收的皮下钉进行皮肤闭合与更短的手术时间和更低的住院时间和45天内再入院的风险相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of complications and surgery outcomes in skin closure methods following cesarean sections.

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the impact of absorbable subcutaneous staples for skin closure in cesarean delivery (CD) on maternal morbidity.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single tertiary university-affiliated medical center between January 2011 and April 2022. In 2020, a new technique involving absorbable subcutaneous staples for skin closure in CD was introduced. We compared surgical outcomes among three groups: non-absorbable staples, absorbable subcutaneous staples, and absorbable subcutaneous sutures. Data were compared between the three groups and demographic, obstetric, and surgical characteristics were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis.

Results: During the study period, 31,660 CDs were performed in our center. The data of 31,419 CDs were available for analysis. Absorbable subcutaneous staples were associated with a significantly shorter surgery time in comparison to non-absorbable staples and sutures (52 min vs 53 min vs 60 min, p < 0.001). No differences were found in rates of wound infections or any surgical site surgery in the 45 days following CD. In a multivariate analysis: the use of absorbable subcutaneous staples was associated with a significantly lower risk for prolonged hospitalization > 5 days (OR 0.6, p < 0.001) and re-admission within 45 days (OR 0.8, p = 0.04).

Conclusion: The use of absorbable subcutaneous staples for skin closure during CD is associated with shorter surgery times and a lower risk of prolonged hospitalization and readmission within 45 days.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
493
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1870 as "Archiv für Gynaekologie", Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics has a long and outstanding tradition. Since 1922 the journal has been the Organ of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. "The Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics" is circulated in over 40 countries world wide and is indexed in "PubMed/Medline" and "Science Citation Index Expanded/Journal Citation Report". The journal publishes invited and submitted reviews; peer-reviewed original articles about clinical topics and basic research as well as news and views and guidelines and position statements from all sub-specialties in gynecology and obstetrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信