对老年神经认知障碍患者日常生活活动评估问卷心理测量特性的系统回顾。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Alia Osman, Dennis Radman, Patricia Belchior, Isabelle Gélinas
{"title":"对老年神经认知障碍患者日常生活活动评估问卷心理测量特性的系统回顾。","authors":"Alia Osman,&nbsp;Dennis Radman,&nbsp;Patricia Belchior,&nbsp;Isabelle Gélinas","doi":"10.1111/1440-1630.13013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) lead to decline in performance in activities of daily living (ADLs). Multiple questionnaires assess this construct among older adults. The objective of this study was to review existing literature studying psychometric properties of questionnaires assessing performance in ADLs of older adults living with MCI and AD specifically.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic review was conducted across Medline, CINAHL and PsychINFO using a combination of keywords related to ADLs, psychometrics, MCI and AD. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: assessments of performance of ADLs for older adults living with AD or MCI, reporting a minimum of one measurement property (e.g. internal consistency), primary research articles, published before June 2023 in English or French. Data extraction and analysis were conducted by two researchers. The methodological quality of psychometric properties was assessed using the COSMIN checklist.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Consumer and Community Involvement</h3>\n \n <p>No consumer or community involvement occurred.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 2539 articles were screened and filtered down to 50 articles including 24 questionnaires respecting inclusion criteria. Of these questionnaires, the three most validated were the Amsterdam Instrumental activities of daily living, the disability assessment for dementia (DAD), and the Bayer ADL scale. Overall, for these three questionnaires, internal consistency, reliability and structural validity were the most studied psychometric properties while criterion validity and hypothesis testing were the least.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study reveals the Amsterdam IADLs as the most validated questionnaire across psychometric properties and the DAD as the most validated across languages. Considering the increasing prevalence of older adults with MCI or AD, questionnaires established on strong measurement properties are valuable tools to evaluate decline in ADL performance and plan suitable interventions. This review provides evidence for clinicians and researchers for the selection of questionnaires to evaluate this population.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY</h3>\n \n <p>Cognitive impairment affects memory and thinking. It makes tasks like dressing, bathing and eating harder. Health-care workers use questionnaires to find out where someone struggles. This helps them plan better care. We reviewed questionnaires for older adults with memory and thinking problems. We found good ones that give important information. Using these questionnaires helps health-care workers support people with daily tasks. This study suggests testing the questionnaires more to improve them.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55418,"journal":{"name":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11758263/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of psychometric properties of questionnaires assessing activities of daily living among older adults with neurocognitive disorders\",\"authors\":\"Alia Osman,&nbsp;Dennis Radman,&nbsp;Patricia Belchior,&nbsp;Isabelle Gélinas\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1440-1630.13013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) lead to decline in performance in activities of daily living (ADLs). Multiple questionnaires assess this construct among older adults. The objective of this study was to review existing literature studying psychometric properties of questionnaires assessing performance in ADLs of older adults living with MCI and AD specifically.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A systematic review was conducted across Medline, CINAHL and PsychINFO using a combination of keywords related to ADLs, psychometrics, MCI and AD. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: assessments of performance of ADLs for older adults living with AD or MCI, reporting a minimum of one measurement property (e.g. internal consistency), primary research articles, published before June 2023 in English or French. Data extraction and analysis were conducted by two researchers. The methodological quality of psychometric properties was assessed using the COSMIN checklist.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Consumer and Community Involvement</h3>\\n \\n <p>No consumer or community involvement occurred.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 2539 articles were screened and filtered down to 50 articles including 24 questionnaires respecting inclusion criteria. Of these questionnaires, the three most validated were the Amsterdam Instrumental activities of daily living, the disability assessment for dementia (DAD), and the Bayer ADL scale. Overall, for these three questionnaires, internal consistency, reliability and structural validity were the most studied psychometric properties while criterion validity and hypothesis testing were the least.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study reveals the Amsterdam IADLs as the most validated questionnaire across psychometric properties and the DAD as the most validated across languages. Considering the increasing prevalence of older adults with MCI or AD, questionnaires established on strong measurement properties are valuable tools to evaluate decline in ADL performance and plan suitable interventions. This review provides evidence for clinicians and researchers for the selection of questionnaires to evaluate this population.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY</h3>\\n \\n <p>Cognitive impairment affects memory and thinking. It makes tasks like dressing, bathing and eating harder. Health-care workers use questionnaires to find out where someone struggles. This helps them plan better care. We reviewed questionnaires for older adults with memory and thinking problems. We found good ones that give important information. Using these questionnaires helps health-care workers support people with daily tasks. This study suggests testing the questionnaires more to improve them.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11758263/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1630.13013\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Occupational Therapy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1630.13013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

轻度认知障碍(MCI)和阿尔茨海默病(AD)导致日常生活活动(adl)表现下降。多份调查问卷评估了老年人的这种结构。本研究的目的是回顾现有文献对MCI和AD老年人adl表现评估问卷的心理测量特性的研究。方法:结合ADLs、心理测量学、MCI和AD相关的关键词,对Medline、CINAHL和PsychINFO进行系统综述。符合以下标准的研究被纳入:对患有AD或MCI的老年人的adl表现进行评估,报告至少一项测量属性(例如内部一致性),主要研究文章,在2023年6月之前以英语或法语发表。数据的提取和分析由两位研究者进行。使用COSMIN检查表评估心理测量属性的方法学质量。消费者和社区参与:没有发生消费者或社区参与。结果:共筛选2539篇文献,筛选到50篇,包括24份符合纳入标准的问卷。在这些问卷中,三个最有效的是阿姆斯特丹日常生活工具活动,痴呆的残疾评估(DAD)和拜耳ADL量表。总体而言,这三份问卷的心理测量特征中,内部一致性、信度和结构效度研究最多,而标准效度和假设检验研究最少。结论:本研究揭示了阿姆斯特丹IADLs是最有效的心理测量性质问卷,而DAD是最有效的跨语言问卷。考虑到老年人MCI或AD患病率的增加,基于强大测量特性的问卷是评估ADL表现下降和计划适当干预的有价值的工具。本综述为临床医生和研究人员选择问卷来评估这一人群提供了证据。简单的语言总结:认知障碍影响记忆和思维。它使穿衣、洗澡和吃饭等任务变得更加困难。卫生保健工作者使用调查问卷来找出人们在哪里挣扎。这有助于他们计划更好的护理。我们回顾了有记忆和思维问题的老年人的调查问卷。我们找到了能提供重要信息的好网站。使用这些问卷有助于保健工作者在日常工作中为人们提供支持。这项研究建议对问卷进行更多的测试以改进它们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A systematic review of psychometric properties of questionnaires assessing activities of daily living among older adults with neurocognitive disorders

A systematic review of psychometric properties of questionnaires assessing activities of daily living among older adults with neurocognitive disorders

Introduction

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) lead to decline in performance in activities of daily living (ADLs). Multiple questionnaires assess this construct among older adults. The objective of this study was to review existing literature studying psychometric properties of questionnaires assessing performance in ADLs of older adults living with MCI and AD specifically.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted across Medline, CINAHL and PsychINFO using a combination of keywords related to ADLs, psychometrics, MCI and AD. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: assessments of performance of ADLs for older adults living with AD or MCI, reporting a minimum of one measurement property (e.g. internal consistency), primary research articles, published before June 2023 in English or French. Data extraction and analysis were conducted by two researchers. The methodological quality of psychometric properties was assessed using the COSMIN checklist.

Consumer and Community Involvement

No consumer or community involvement occurred.

Results

A total of 2539 articles were screened and filtered down to 50 articles including 24 questionnaires respecting inclusion criteria. Of these questionnaires, the three most validated were the Amsterdam Instrumental activities of daily living, the disability assessment for dementia (DAD), and the Bayer ADL scale. Overall, for these three questionnaires, internal consistency, reliability and structural validity were the most studied psychometric properties while criterion validity and hypothesis testing were the least.

Conclusion

This study reveals the Amsterdam IADLs as the most validated questionnaire across psychometric properties and the DAD as the most validated across languages. Considering the increasing prevalence of older adults with MCI or AD, questionnaires established on strong measurement properties are valuable tools to evaluate decline in ADL performance and plan suitable interventions. This review provides evidence for clinicians and researchers for the selection of questionnaires to evaluate this population.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Cognitive impairment affects memory and thinking. It makes tasks like dressing, bathing and eating harder. Health-care workers use questionnaires to find out where someone struggles. This helps them plan better care. We reviewed questionnaires for older adults with memory and thinking problems. We found good ones that give important information. Using these questionnaires helps health-care workers support people with daily tasks. This study suggests testing the questionnaires more to improve them.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Occupational Therapy Journal is a leading international peer reviewed publication presenting influential, high quality innovative scholarship and research relevant to occupational therapy. The aim of the journal is to be a leader in the dissemination of scholarship and evidence to substantiate, influence and shape policy and occupational therapy practice locally and globally. The journal publishes empirical studies, theoretical papers, and reviews. Preference will be given to manuscripts that have a sound theoretical basis, methodological rigour with sufficient scope and scale to make important new contributions to the occupational therapy body of knowledge. AOTJ does not publish protocols for any study design The journal will consider multidisciplinary or interprofessional studies that include occupational therapy, occupational therapists or occupational therapy students, so long as ‘key points’ highlight the specific implications for occupational therapy, occupational therapists and/or occupational therapy students and/or consumers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信