生物电阻抗相位角分析评估急性心力衰竭充血。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-01-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0317333
Sangho Sohn, Jinsung Jeon, Ji Eun Lee, Soo Hyung Park, Dong Oh Kang, Eun Jin Park, Dae-In Lee, Jah Yeon Choi, Seung Young Roh, Jin Oh Na, Cheol Ung Choi, Jin Won Kim, Seung Woon Rha, Chang Gyu Park, Sunki Lee, Eung Ju Kim
{"title":"生物电阻抗相位角分析评估急性心力衰竭充血。","authors":"Sangho Sohn, Jinsung Jeon, Ji Eun Lee, Soo Hyung Park, Dong Oh Kang, Eun Jin Park, Dae-In Lee, Jah Yeon Choi, Seung Young Roh, Jin Oh Na, Cheol Ung Choi, Jin Won Kim, Seung Woon Rha, Chang Gyu Park, Sunki Lee, Eung Ju Kim","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0317333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The phase angle (PhA) in bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) reflects the cell membrane integrity or body fluid equilibrium. We examined how the PhA aligns with previously known markers of acute heart failure (HF) and assessed its value as a screening tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PhA was measured in 50 patients with HF and 20 non-HF controls along with the edema index (EI), another BIA parameter suggestive of edema. Chest computed tomography-measured lung fluid content (LFC) was used to assess pulmonary congestion. A correlation analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationships between PhA and EI, NT-proBNP, and LFC. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the cut-off values for PhA and EI for classifying patients with HF. The area under the curve (AUC) was compared using the DeLong test to evaluate the performance of PhA and EI compared to that of LFC in correctly classifying HF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PhA levels were significantly lower in the HF group. Whole-body PhA was 4.49° in the HF group and 5.68° in the control group. Moderate and significant correlation was observed between PhA measured at 50-kHz and both NT-proBNP (-0.56 to -0.27, all p-values<0.05) and LFC (-0.52 to -0.41, all p-values <0.05). The AUC for whole-body PhA was 0.827 (confidence interval [CI] 0.724-0.931, p<0.01) and was 0.883 (CI 0.806-0.961, p<0.01) for EI, and the optimal cutoffs were estimated as 5° (sensitivity 0.84, specificity 0.80) and 0.394 (sensitivity 0.78, specificity 0.95), respectively. When both PhA and EI were included in the model, the AUC increased to 0.905, and this was comparable to that of LFC (AUC = 0.913, p = 0.857).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PhA exhibited a correlation with known markers of HF and demonstrated its potential as a non-invasive screening tool for the early detection of HF exacerbation. The combined use of PhA and EI can provide a robust alternative for routine self-monitoring in patients with HF, thereby enhancing early intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 1","pages":"e0317333"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759352/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phase angle in bioelectrical impedance analysis for assessing congestion in acute heart failure.\",\"authors\":\"Sangho Sohn, Jinsung Jeon, Ji Eun Lee, Soo Hyung Park, Dong Oh Kang, Eun Jin Park, Dae-In Lee, Jah Yeon Choi, Seung Young Roh, Jin Oh Na, Cheol Ung Choi, Jin Won Kim, Seung Woon Rha, Chang Gyu Park, Sunki Lee, Eung Ju Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0317333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The phase angle (PhA) in bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) reflects the cell membrane integrity or body fluid equilibrium. We examined how the PhA aligns with previously known markers of acute heart failure (HF) and assessed its value as a screening tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PhA was measured in 50 patients with HF and 20 non-HF controls along with the edema index (EI), another BIA parameter suggestive of edema. Chest computed tomography-measured lung fluid content (LFC) was used to assess pulmonary congestion. A correlation analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationships between PhA and EI, NT-proBNP, and LFC. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the cut-off values for PhA and EI for classifying patients with HF. The area under the curve (AUC) was compared using the DeLong test to evaluate the performance of PhA and EI compared to that of LFC in correctly classifying HF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PhA levels were significantly lower in the HF group. Whole-body PhA was 4.49° in the HF group and 5.68° in the control group. Moderate and significant correlation was observed between PhA measured at 50-kHz and both NT-proBNP (-0.56 to -0.27, all p-values<0.05) and LFC (-0.52 to -0.41, all p-values <0.05). The AUC for whole-body PhA was 0.827 (confidence interval [CI] 0.724-0.931, p<0.01) and was 0.883 (CI 0.806-0.961, p<0.01) for EI, and the optimal cutoffs were estimated as 5° (sensitivity 0.84, specificity 0.80) and 0.394 (sensitivity 0.78, specificity 0.95), respectively. When both PhA and EI were included in the model, the AUC increased to 0.905, and this was comparable to that of LFC (AUC = 0.913, p = 0.857).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PhA exhibited a correlation with known markers of HF and demonstrated its potential as a non-invasive screening tool for the early detection of HF exacerbation. The combined use of PhA and EI can provide a robust alternative for routine self-monitoring in patients with HF, thereby enhancing early intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"e0317333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759352/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317333\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317333","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:生物电阻抗分析(BIA)中相位角(PhA)反映了细胞膜完整性或体液平衡。我们研究了PhA如何与先前已知的急性心力衰竭(HF)标志物相一致,并评估了其作为筛查工具的价值。方法:测量50例HF患者和20例非HF对照者的PhA,同时测量水肿指数(EI),这是另一个提示水肿的BIA参数。胸部计算机断层扫描测量肺液含量(LFC)用于评估肺充血。通过相关分析评估PhA与EI、NT-proBNP和LFC之间的关系。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析确定PhA和EI的临界值,用于对HF患者进行分类。采用DeLong检验比较了曲线下面积(AUC),以评价PhA和EI与LFC在正确分类HF方面的性能。结果:HF组PhA水平明显降低。HF组全身PhA为4.49°,对照组为5.68°。在50 khz测量的PhA与NT-proBNP之间观察到中度和显著的相关性(-0.56至-0.27,所有p值)。结论:PhA与已知的HF标志物相关,并显示其作为早期检测HF恶化的非侵入性筛查工具的潜力。PhA和EI的联合使用可以为心衰患者的常规自我监测提供一个强有力的替代方案,从而加强早期干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Phase angle in bioelectrical impedance analysis for assessing congestion in acute heart failure.

Phase angle in bioelectrical impedance analysis for assessing congestion in acute heart failure.

Phase angle in bioelectrical impedance analysis for assessing congestion in acute heart failure.

Phase angle in bioelectrical impedance analysis for assessing congestion in acute heart failure.

Background: The phase angle (PhA) in bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) reflects the cell membrane integrity or body fluid equilibrium. We examined how the PhA aligns with previously known markers of acute heart failure (HF) and assessed its value as a screening tool.

Methods: PhA was measured in 50 patients with HF and 20 non-HF controls along with the edema index (EI), another BIA parameter suggestive of edema. Chest computed tomography-measured lung fluid content (LFC) was used to assess pulmonary congestion. A correlation analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationships between PhA and EI, NT-proBNP, and LFC. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the cut-off values for PhA and EI for classifying patients with HF. The area under the curve (AUC) was compared using the DeLong test to evaluate the performance of PhA and EI compared to that of LFC in correctly classifying HF.

Results: The PhA levels were significantly lower in the HF group. Whole-body PhA was 4.49° in the HF group and 5.68° in the control group. Moderate and significant correlation was observed between PhA measured at 50-kHz and both NT-proBNP (-0.56 to -0.27, all p-values<0.05) and LFC (-0.52 to -0.41, all p-values <0.05). The AUC for whole-body PhA was 0.827 (confidence interval [CI] 0.724-0.931, p<0.01) and was 0.883 (CI 0.806-0.961, p<0.01) for EI, and the optimal cutoffs were estimated as 5° (sensitivity 0.84, specificity 0.80) and 0.394 (sensitivity 0.78, specificity 0.95), respectively. When both PhA and EI were included in the model, the AUC increased to 0.905, and this was comparable to that of LFC (AUC = 0.913, p = 0.857).

Conclusions: PhA exhibited a correlation with known markers of HF and demonstrated its potential as a non-invasive screening tool for the early detection of HF exacerbation. The combined use of PhA and EI can provide a robust alternative for routine self-monitoring in patients with HF, thereby enhancing early intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信