肾移植后透析方式与免疫抑制依从性的关系——一项单中心研究

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-01-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0317435
Fernanda Ortiz, Aino Salonsalmi, Ilkka Helanterä
{"title":"肾移植后透析方式与免疫抑制依从性的关系——一项单中心研究","authors":"Fernanda Ortiz, Aino Salonsalmi, Ilkka Helanterä","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0317435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with end-stage kidney disease often prefer home-based dialysis due to higher self-efficacy, which relates to improved medical treatment adherence. Kidney transplantation (KT) success depends on adhering to immunosuppressive medication post-transplant.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate whether adherence post-kidney transplantation (KT) and patients' attitudes toward immunosuppression were influenced by their prior dialysis type modality. Additionally, the study examined if adherence and patient's attitudes towards immunosuppression are associated with kidney graft survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional single-center study included 201 KT patients. Adherence was assessed using BAASIS and the coefficient of variation of calcineurin inhibitors (COV-CNI). Patient attitudes towards medication were evaluated using the Q-method. Pill burden, comorbidity score and HRQoL and medication complexity, were scored. Cox regression was applied to determine KT survival outcomes over a 14-year follow-up period (until Dec 2021).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prior dialysis modality was not associated with adherence to immunosuppression post-KT evaluated by BAASIS on average 4.7 years post-KT. Previous in-center hemodialysis patients had a higher CNI-COV (p = 0.011). The Q-sort analysis identified fully adherent patients linked to profile 1 (organized, resilient) whereas profile 2 patients were more careless. Patients linked to profile 3 (challenging, nervous) had higher education, a higher pill burden, and experienced more immunosuppression side effects. Death-censored graft loss increased by 7.6% with each additional pill, quadrupled if one dose of immunosuppression was missed, and increased by 2.9% for each point of COV-CNI rise.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adherence to immunosuppression post-KT using BAASIS was not associated with prior dialysis type, despite in-center hemodialysis patients showing the highest COV-CNI. Taking COV-CNI into account, managing missed doses of immunosuppressants, and exploring patient attitudes could potentially enhance adherence and consequently improve KT survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 1","pages":"e0317435"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11760586/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations between dialysis modality and adherence to immunosuppression after kidney transplantation-A single-center study.\",\"authors\":\"Fernanda Ortiz, Aino Salonsalmi, Ilkka Helanterä\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0317435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with end-stage kidney disease often prefer home-based dialysis due to higher self-efficacy, which relates to improved medical treatment adherence. Kidney transplantation (KT) success depends on adhering to immunosuppressive medication post-transplant.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate whether adherence post-kidney transplantation (KT) and patients' attitudes toward immunosuppression were influenced by their prior dialysis type modality. Additionally, the study examined if adherence and patient's attitudes towards immunosuppression are associated with kidney graft survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional single-center study included 201 KT patients. Adherence was assessed using BAASIS and the coefficient of variation of calcineurin inhibitors (COV-CNI). Patient attitudes towards medication were evaluated using the Q-method. Pill burden, comorbidity score and HRQoL and medication complexity, were scored. Cox regression was applied to determine KT survival outcomes over a 14-year follow-up period (until Dec 2021).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prior dialysis modality was not associated with adherence to immunosuppression post-KT evaluated by BAASIS on average 4.7 years post-KT. Previous in-center hemodialysis patients had a higher CNI-COV (p = 0.011). The Q-sort analysis identified fully adherent patients linked to profile 1 (organized, resilient) whereas profile 2 patients were more careless. Patients linked to profile 3 (challenging, nervous) had higher education, a higher pill burden, and experienced more immunosuppression side effects. Death-censored graft loss increased by 7.6% with each additional pill, quadrupled if one dose of immunosuppression was missed, and increased by 2.9% for each point of COV-CNI rise.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adherence to immunosuppression post-KT using BAASIS was not associated with prior dialysis type, despite in-center hemodialysis patients showing the highest COV-CNI. Taking COV-CNI into account, managing missed doses of immunosuppressants, and exploring patient attitudes could potentially enhance adherence and consequently improve KT survival.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"e0317435\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11760586/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317435\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317435","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于自我效能感较高,终末期肾病患者往往更倾向于家庭透析,这与改善药物治疗依从性有关。肾移植(KT)的成功取决于移植后免疫抑制药物的坚持。目的:探讨肾移植术后依从性和患者对免疫抑制的态度是否受既往透析类型的影响。此外,该研究还检查了依从性和患者对免疫抑制的态度是否与移植肾存活有关。方法:本横断面单中心研究纳入201例KT患者。使用basis和钙调磷酸酶抑制剂变异系数(COV-CNI)评估依从性。采用q -法评价患者对药物的态度。对药物负担、合并症评分、HRQoL和用药复杂性进行评分。采用Cox回归来确定14年随访期间(至2021年12月)的KT生存结局。结果:先前的透析方式与kt后平均4.7年的免疫抑制依从性无关。既往中心血液透析患者的CNI-COV较高(p = 0.011)。Q-sort分析确定了与特征1(有组织,有弹性)相关的完全依从性患者,而特征2患者则更粗心。与特征3(挑战、紧张)相关的患者受教育程度较高,服药负担较高,免疫抑制副作用较多。每增加一剂免疫抑制药物,死亡审查的移植物损失增加7.6%,如果错过一剂免疫抑制药物,死亡审查的移植物损失增加四倍,并且每增加一点COV-CNI增加2.9%。结论:尽管中心血液透析患者的COV-CNI最高,但kt后使用BAASIS坚持免疫抑制与先前的透析类型无关。考虑到COV-CNI,管理错过的免疫抑制剂剂量,并探索患者的态度,可能会提高依从性,从而提高KT的生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Associations between dialysis modality and adherence to immunosuppression after kidney transplantation-A single-center study.

Associations between dialysis modality and adherence to immunosuppression after kidney transplantation-A single-center study.

Associations between dialysis modality and adherence to immunosuppression after kidney transplantation-A single-center study.

Associations between dialysis modality and adherence to immunosuppression after kidney transplantation-A single-center study.

Background: Patients with end-stage kidney disease often prefer home-based dialysis due to higher self-efficacy, which relates to improved medical treatment adherence. Kidney transplantation (KT) success depends on adhering to immunosuppressive medication post-transplant.

Objectives: To investigate whether adherence post-kidney transplantation (KT) and patients' attitudes toward immunosuppression were influenced by their prior dialysis type modality. Additionally, the study examined if adherence and patient's attitudes towards immunosuppression are associated with kidney graft survival.

Methods: This cross-sectional single-center study included 201 KT patients. Adherence was assessed using BAASIS and the coefficient of variation of calcineurin inhibitors (COV-CNI). Patient attitudes towards medication were evaluated using the Q-method. Pill burden, comorbidity score and HRQoL and medication complexity, were scored. Cox regression was applied to determine KT survival outcomes over a 14-year follow-up period (until Dec 2021).

Results: Prior dialysis modality was not associated with adherence to immunosuppression post-KT evaluated by BAASIS on average 4.7 years post-KT. Previous in-center hemodialysis patients had a higher CNI-COV (p = 0.011). The Q-sort analysis identified fully adherent patients linked to profile 1 (organized, resilient) whereas profile 2 patients were more careless. Patients linked to profile 3 (challenging, nervous) had higher education, a higher pill burden, and experienced more immunosuppression side effects. Death-censored graft loss increased by 7.6% with each additional pill, quadrupled if one dose of immunosuppression was missed, and increased by 2.9% for each point of COV-CNI rise.

Conclusions: Adherence to immunosuppression post-KT using BAASIS was not associated with prior dialysis type, despite in-center hemodialysis patients showing the highest COV-CNI. Taking COV-CNI into account, managing missed doses of immunosuppressants, and exploring patient attitudes could potentially enhance adherence and consequently improve KT survival.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信