飞秒激光白内障手术中文丘里腔与蠕动腔超声乳化术的疗效比较:文丘里腔与蠕动腔超声乳化术治疗白内障。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Rachel A Scott, Caleb J Holtmeyer, Travis M Parker, Jessica K Willis, Wendell J Scott, Randall J Olson
{"title":"飞秒激光白内障手术中文丘里腔与蠕动腔超声乳化术的疗效比较:文丘里腔与蠕动腔超声乳化术治疗白内障。","authors":"Rachel A Scott, Caleb J Holtmeyer, Travis M Parker, Jessica K Willis, Wendell J Scott, Randall J Olson","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the efficiency of peristaltic vs venturi vacuum platforms when applied to femtosecond-treated cataract.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Outpatient Eye Center, Mercy Health System, Springfield, Missouri.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a prospective randomized controlled trial of 111 patients with moderate nuclear sclerosis scheduled for bilateral routine laser cataract surgery (LCS) ( ClinicalTrials.gov ; NCT03970525).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were randomized to receive surgery in 1 eye with a peristaltic system and the other with a venturi system. The vacuum and phacoemulsification power were the same for both systems. The primary outcomes were phacoemulsification energy (EFX), ultrasound time (UST), phacoemulsification in/out time (PIOT), surgery time (speculum in/out time), and endothelial cell count (ECC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The type of vacuum/phacoemulsification system used during LCS had a significant impact on the 4 procedural outcomes. Specifically, EFX, UST, PIOT, and total microscope time (speculum in/out case time) were lower when the venturi system was used compared with the peristaltic system ( t (100) = -4.28, P < .001). The vacuum system used did not affect the uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, or central cornea thickness. ECC decreased by 6.38% with venturi and 8.32% with peristaltic ( t (87) = 1.19, P = .235). There were no complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Venturi-based phacoemulsification was more efficient than peristaltic, based on energy and time, when used for removal of femtosecond-treated cataract.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"382-387"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency of venturi vs peristaltic-based phacoemulsification in femtosecond laser cataract surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel A Scott, Caleb J Holtmeyer, Travis M Parker, Jessica K Willis, Wendell J Scott, Randall J Olson\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the efficiency of peristaltic vs venturi vacuum platforms when applied to femtosecond-treated cataract.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Outpatient Eye Center, Mercy Health System, Springfield, Missouri.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a prospective randomized controlled trial of 111 patients with moderate nuclear sclerosis scheduled for bilateral routine laser cataract surgery (LCS) ( ClinicalTrials.gov ; NCT03970525).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were randomized to receive surgery in 1 eye with a peristaltic system and the other with a venturi system. The vacuum and phacoemulsification power were the same for both systems. The primary outcomes were phacoemulsification energy (EFX), ultrasound time (UST), phacoemulsification in/out time (PIOT), surgery time (speculum in/out time), and endothelial cell count (ECC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The type of vacuum/phacoemulsification system used during LCS had a significant impact on the 4 procedural outcomes. Specifically, EFX, UST, PIOT, and total microscope time (speculum in/out case time) were lower when the venturi system was used compared with the peristaltic system ( t (100) = -4.28, P < .001). The vacuum system used did not affect the uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, or central cornea thickness. ECC decreased by 6.38% with venturi and 8.32% with peristaltic ( t (87) = 1.19, P = .235). There were no complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Venturi-based phacoemulsification was more efficient than peristaltic, based on energy and time, when used for removal of femtosecond-treated cataract.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"382-387\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001618\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001618","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较蠕动和文丘里真空平台在飞秒治疗白内障中的应用效果。地点:美国密苏里州斯普林菲尔德Mercy卫生系统眼科门诊中心。设计:这是一项前瞻性随机对照试验,111例中度核硬化患者计划接受双侧常规激光白内障手术(clinicaltrials.gov;NCT03970525)。方法:患者随机接受一只眼蠕动系统和另一只眼文丘里系统手术。两个系统的真空功率和超功率是相同的。主要结果为EFX、UST(超声时间)、PIOT(超声入/出时间)、手术时间(窥镜入/出时间)和ECC(内皮细胞计数)。结果:激光白内障手术中使用的真空/超声乳化系统的类型对四项手术结果有显著影响。其中,文丘里超声系统的超声乳化能(EFX)、超声时间(UST)、超声针尖入/出时间(PIOT)、显微总时间(镜内/镜出时间)均低于蠕动系统(t(100)=-4.28, p)。结论:文丘里超声系统的超声乳化能(EFX)、超声时间(UST)、超声针尖入/出时间(PIOT)、显微总时间(镜内/镜出时间)均优于蠕动系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficiency of venturi vs peristaltic-based phacoemulsification in femtosecond laser cataract surgery.

Purpose: To compare the efficiency of peristaltic vs venturi vacuum platforms when applied to femtosecond-treated cataract.

Setting: Outpatient Eye Center, Mercy Health System, Springfield, Missouri.

Design: This is a prospective randomized controlled trial of 111 patients with moderate nuclear sclerosis scheduled for bilateral routine laser cataract surgery (LCS) ( ClinicalTrials.gov ; NCT03970525).

Methods: Patients were randomized to receive surgery in 1 eye with a peristaltic system and the other with a venturi system. The vacuum and phacoemulsification power were the same for both systems. The primary outcomes were phacoemulsification energy (EFX), ultrasound time (UST), phacoemulsification in/out time (PIOT), surgery time (speculum in/out time), and endothelial cell count (ECC).

Results: The type of vacuum/phacoemulsification system used during LCS had a significant impact on the 4 procedural outcomes. Specifically, EFX, UST, PIOT, and total microscope time (speculum in/out case time) were lower when the venturi system was used compared with the peristaltic system ( t (100) = -4.28, P < .001). The vacuum system used did not affect the uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, or central cornea thickness. ECC decreased by 6.38% with venturi and 8.32% with peristaltic ( t (87) = 1.19, P = .235). There were no complications.

Conclusions: Venturi-based phacoemulsification was more efficient than peristaltic, based on energy and time, when used for removal of femtosecond-treated cataract.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信