AMP快速检测ROTA/腺病毒同时检测粪便样本中轮状病毒和腺病毒的评价

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Majd Allahham, Wolfgang Rennert, Kiija Manty Miller, Mustafa Barham, William Amoss, Musa Hindiyeh
{"title":"AMP快速检测ROTA/腺病毒同时检测粪便样本中轮状病毒和腺病毒的评价","authors":"Majd Allahham, Wolfgang Rennert, Kiija Manty Miller, Mustafa Barham, William Amoss, Musa Hindiyeh","doi":"10.1007/s10096-025-05042-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rotavirus (RV) and Adenovirus (AdV) gastroenteritis affect children worldwide. The sensitivity and specificity of the AMP Rapid Test ROTA/ADENOVIRUS [AMP-RA] for the detection of RV and AdV were compared against qPCR Allplex™ GI-Virus Assay [Allplex-GI].</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional hospital-based surveillance study was conducted using stool samples from 1,148 patients under the age of five years between July 2023 and May 2024 with gastroenteritis. All samples were tested using the AMP-RA and challenged with the Allplex-GI that detects rotavirus A, enteric adenovirus F, norovirus genogroups GI & GII, sapovirus, and astrovirus. RV samples testing positive by AMP-RA and/or Allplex-GI were subjected to genotyping.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,148 stool samples, 123 samples tested positive for RV on AMP-RA while 133 tested positive on the Allplex™ GI. The clinical sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of the AMP-RA for the detection of RV were 92.4% and 100%, respectively, while, the clinical specificity and negative predictive value (NPV) of the AMP-RA kit were 100% and 99%, respectively. The AMP-RA was able to detect all RV genotypes that circulated (G1[P8], G2[P4], G9[P8], G9[P4], G9[P9]). The AMP-RA assay detected 48 positive AdV samples and failed to detect 28 samples. Thus, the clinical sensitivity and PPV were 63.1% and 24.6%, respectively. 147 samples were positive for AdV on AMP-RA and negative by Allplex-GI, indicating a clinical specificity and NPV of 86.2% and 97.1%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AMP-RA showed high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for RV detection. The reliability of detecting AdV was insufficient, emphasizing the need for further adenovirus test improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":11782,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"839-845"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the AMP rapid test ROTA/ADENOVIRUS for simultaneous detection of rotavirus and adenovirus in stool samples.\",\"authors\":\"Majd Allahham, Wolfgang Rennert, Kiija Manty Miller, Mustafa Barham, William Amoss, Musa Hindiyeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10096-025-05042-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rotavirus (RV) and Adenovirus (AdV) gastroenteritis affect children worldwide. The sensitivity and specificity of the AMP Rapid Test ROTA/ADENOVIRUS [AMP-RA] for the detection of RV and AdV were compared against qPCR Allplex™ GI-Virus Assay [Allplex-GI].</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional hospital-based surveillance study was conducted using stool samples from 1,148 patients under the age of five years between July 2023 and May 2024 with gastroenteritis. All samples were tested using the AMP-RA and challenged with the Allplex-GI that detects rotavirus A, enteric adenovirus F, norovirus genogroups GI & GII, sapovirus, and astrovirus. RV samples testing positive by AMP-RA and/or Allplex-GI were subjected to genotyping.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1,148 stool samples, 123 samples tested positive for RV on AMP-RA while 133 tested positive on the Allplex™ GI. The clinical sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of the AMP-RA for the detection of RV were 92.4% and 100%, respectively, while, the clinical specificity and negative predictive value (NPV) of the AMP-RA kit were 100% and 99%, respectively. The AMP-RA was able to detect all RV genotypes that circulated (G1[P8], G2[P4], G9[P8], G9[P4], G9[P9]). The AMP-RA assay detected 48 positive AdV samples and failed to detect 28 samples. Thus, the clinical sensitivity and PPV were 63.1% and 24.6%, respectively. 147 samples were positive for AdV on AMP-RA and negative by Allplex-GI, indicating a clinical specificity and NPV of 86.2% and 97.1%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AMP-RA showed high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for RV detection. The reliability of detecting AdV was insufficient, emphasizing the need for further adenovirus test improvement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"839-845\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-025-05042-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-025-05042-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:轮状病毒(RV)和腺病毒(AdV)胃肠炎影响全世界的儿童。将AMP快速检测ROTA/腺病毒[AMP- ra]检测RV和AdV的敏感性和特异性与qPCR Allplex™GI-Virus Assay [Allplex- gi]进行比较。方法:对2023年7月至2024年5月期间1148名5岁以下肠胃炎患者的粪便样本进行了横断面医院监测研究。所有样本均使用AMP-RA进行检测,并使用可检测轮状病毒A、肠腺病毒F、诺如病毒GI和GII基因群、萨波病毒和星状病毒的Allplex-GI进行激振。对AMP-RA和/或Allplex-GI检测阳性的RV样本进行基因分型。结果:在1148份粪便样本中,123份样本在AMP-RA中检测出RV阳性,133份在Allplex™GI中检测出阳性。AMP-RA检测RV的临床敏感性和阳性预测值(PPV)分别为92.4%和100%,AMP-RA试剂盒的临床特异性和阴性预测值(NPV)分别为100%和99%。AMP-RA能够检测到所有流通的RV基因型(G1[P8]、G2[P4]、G9[P8]、G9[P4]、G9[P9])。AMP-RA检测检测出48例AdV阳性,28例AdV未检出。临床敏感性为63.1%,PPV为24.6%。147份样本AMP-RA AdV阳性,Allplex-GI阴性,临床特异性为86.2%,NPV为97.1%。结论:AMP-RA对RV具有较高的诊断敏感性和特异性。检测AdV的可靠性不足,强调需要进一步改进腺病毒检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the AMP rapid test ROTA/ADENOVIRUS for simultaneous detection of rotavirus and adenovirus in stool samples.

Background: Rotavirus (RV) and Adenovirus (AdV) gastroenteritis affect children worldwide. The sensitivity and specificity of the AMP Rapid Test ROTA/ADENOVIRUS [AMP-RA] for the detection of RV and AdV were compared against qPCR Allplex™ GI-Virus Assay [Allplex-GI].

Methods: A cross-sectional hospital-based surveillance study was conducted using stool samples from 1,148 patients under the age of five years between July 2023 and May 2024 with gastroenteritis. All samples were tested using the AMP-RA and challenged with the Allplex-GI that detects rotavirus A, enteric adenovirus F, norovirus genogroups GI & GII, sapovirus, and astrovirus. RV samples testing positive by AMP-RA and/or Allplex-GI were subjected to genotyping.

Results: Of the 1,148 stool samples, 123 samples tested positive for RV on AMP-RA while 133 tested positive on the Allplex™ GI. The clinical sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of the AMP-RA for the detection of RV were 92.4% and 100%, respectively, while, the clinical specificity and negative predictive value (NPV) of the AMP-RA kit were 100% and 99%, respectively. The AMP-RA was able to detect all RV genotypes that circulated (G1[P8], G2[P4], G9[P8], G9[P4], G9[P9]). The AMP-RA assay detected 48 positive AdV samples and failed to detect 28 samples. Thus, the clinical sensitivity and PPV were 63.1% and 24.6%, respectively. 147 samples were positive for AdV on AMP-RA and negative by Allplex-GI, indicating a clinical specificity and NPV of 86.2% and 97.1%, respectively.

Conclusion: AMP-RA showed high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for RV detection. The reliability of detecting AdV was insufficient, emphasizing the need for further adenovirus test improvement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
2.20%
发文量
138
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: EJCMID is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to the publication of communications on infectious diseases of bacterial, viral and parasitic origin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信