Stefano Volinia, Anna Terrazzan, Tomasz S. Kaminski, Krystian Jadzewski, Eva Reali, Nicoletta Bianchi, Jeff Palatini
{"title":"循环肿瘤细胞与早期胚胎滋养外胚层和转移性肿瘤共享RNA模块。","authors":"Stefano Volinia, Anna Terrazzan, Tomasz S. Kaminski, Krystian Jadzewski, Eva Reali, Nicoletta Bianchi, Jeff Palatini","doi":"10.1002/cac2.12664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Metastasis is the primary cause of cancer-related deaths, accounting for an estimated 66% to 90% of fatalities [<span>1</span>]. It is a multistep process involving the dissemination of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and their colonization of distant organs [<span>2, 3</span>]. A higher number of detected CTCs in cancer patients is associated with shorter survival [<span>4</span>].</p><p>We analyzed 544 single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) profiles of bona fide CTCs, identified as keratin-positive and aneuploid, from over 3,000 putative CTC profiles available in public databases, as detailed in Supplementary Table S1. Most of the CTCs originated from patients with breast cancer (<i>n</i> = 502, 92.3%), while a smaller number were derived from patients with prostate cancer (<i>n</i> = 42). All experimental methods are described in the Supplementary Materials and Methods.</p><p>All bona fide CTCs were positive for KRT18 and negative for PTPRC (CD45), as expected. Three main CTC subgroups were identified (Supplementary Figure S1). We labeled the two epithelial (EPCAM<sup>+</sup>) subgroups as epithelial A (epiA) and epithelial B (epiB), while the third subgroup was mesenchymal (VIM<sup>+</sup>/EPCAM<sup>−</sup>). CAV1 and AXL showed the highest specificity for mesenchymal CTCs, whereas LY6E was the most distinctive gene for epiB CTCs (Supplementary Tables S2–S4). Further analysis revealed that mesenchymal and epiB, but not epiA CTCs, were actively engaged in the cell cycle, as inferred using the R package Tricycle (Supplementary Figure S1). The biological implications of these three CTC subgroups are highly relevant. Mesenchymal CTCs expressed significantly lower levels of KRT18 and other keratins, such as KRT19 and KRT7, compared to epithelial CTCs. Conversely, vimentin, another class of intermediate filaments, was highly expressed in mesenchymal CTCs. The shift from keratins to vimentin is a hallmark molecular event in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). EMT regulators ZEB1, ZEB2, and SNAI2 were upregulated in mesenchymal CTCs, indicating that EMT was responsible for their origin. These findings highlight the need to prioritize the detection and targeting of epiB and mesenchymal CTCs. PD-L1 (CD274), an important target for immunotherapy in clinical practice, was expressed in only a small fraction of mesenchymal CTCs and even less in epithelial CTCs (Supplementary Figure S2). In contrast, two other immune checkpoint genes, CD276 (B7-H3) and PVR (CD155), were highly expressed in CTCs, comparable to their expression in trophoblasts. This suggests an immuno-evasive phenotype common to most CTCs, driven by the expression of CD276 and PVR.</p><p>Is there a functional relationship between CTCs and trophoblast cells, as suggested by the co-expression of genes such as CD276, SP6, and LY6E (Supplementary Figure S3)? To address this question, we examined potential links between CTCs and the placenta or early embryo by integrating scRNA-seq profiles of CTCs with those from normal and cancerous breast tissue, early embryos and first- and second-trimester human placenta (Figure 1A, Supplemental Figures S4,S5). The UMAP plot positioned CTCs within a region enclosed by metastatic breast cancer cells, early embryonic cells, and trophoblast cells. We further explored these interrelations using divisive hierarchical spectral clustering (Figure 1B), which confirmed that CTCs, trophoblast cells, and embryonic cells share similar RNA profiles (Supplementary Figure S6 and Supplementary Table S5). To validate these findings, we mapped the CTCs onto the transcriptional landscape of embryo developmental [<span>5</span>] (Figure 1C). A subset of CTCs (<i>n</i> = 72 out of 544, <i>p</i>-value < 0.001) aligned with the trophectoderm (TE), the blastocyst cells that give rise to the trophoblast, facilitating embryo attachment and subsequent invasion to form the placenta. Notably, these TE-like CTCs were predominantly from the epiB subgroup (64 out of 72, Fisher Test <i>p</i>-value < 0.001) and were frequently in the S phase of the cell cycle (Supplementary Figure S7). To further investigate the similarity between epiB CTCs and TE, we performed a transcriptomic correlation analysis across all cell types. In the resulting correlation plot (Figure 1D), epiA CTCs clustered among breast cancer subtypes, while epiB and mesenchymal CTCs clustered with early embryonic stages. In particular, epiB CTCs showed strong similarity to TE and its precursors, pre-lineage cells. This analysis confirmed the strong relationship between epiB CTCs and the TE lineage previously observed.</p><p>We hypothesized that the similarity between epiB CTCs and early embryonic stages arises from functional convergence. Specifically, we proposed that key traits essential for the functionality of CTCs (invasiveness and immune-evasion) are encoded in the human genome as part of the trophectodermal program, which leads to the extravillous trophoblast and ultimately to the placenta. To test this hypothesis, we investigated transcription factors that were upregulated and had active gene regulatory networks (GRNs) in both epiB CTCs and TE or its precursors, pre-lineages (Figure 1E). While epiB CTCs exhibited several active GRNs, only CEBPA and ILF2 were shared with TE. Furthermore, while ILF2 was ubiquitously expressed across the dataset, the upregulation of CEBPA mRNA was predominantly restricted to epiB CTCs and TE (Supplementary Figure S8). Additionally, we identified several GRNs that appeared to be specific to either epiB or mesenchymal CTCs (Figure 1E).</p><p>Is it possible to define a cellular path for cancer establishment and progression in breast cancer, given the diversity of the scRNA-seq profiles in the dataset we assembled? To reconstruct the lineages leading from normal breast tissue, through various breast cancer subtypes, to metastatic lymph nodes and eventually to CTCs, we inferred pseudotime using Slingshot [<span>6</span>]. Although the analysis was unsupervised, the normal breast clusters were accurately identified as the starting points, culminating in the epithelial A/B CTCs via intermediate cell clusters from ER<sup>+</sup> and metastatic cancers (Figure 1F). The progression lineages for ER<sup>+</sup> and HER2<sup>+</sup> breast cancer shared common evolutionary segments, ultimately leading to the emergence of CTCs (Supplementary Table S6).</p><p>We finally identified RNA modules that could be relevant to metastatic evolution. The genes upregulated in CTCs, metastatic lymph nodes, and their respective primary tumors are shown in Supplementary Figure S9 and listed in Supplementary Table S7. Two genes associated with metastasis (ALDOA and PSMA6) were also upregulated in TE. The expression levels of RNA modules implicated in progression are displayed, superimposed on the UMAP plot, in Supplementary Figures S10–S12.</p><p>In this study, we aimed to characterize CTCs within the context of the cancer environment using scRNA-seq. We identified a mesenchymal CTC (VIM<sup>+</sup>/AXL1<sup>+</sup>) subpopulation, distinct from the larger epithelial CTCs (EPCAM<sup>+</sup>) population. Importantly, we further divided the epithelial CTCs into two divergent subgroups: epiA, characterized by high CD24/CDH1 expression, and epiB, marked by elevated levels of the stem cell master regulators SOX2/CEBPA. Notably, epiB and mesenchymal CTCs, but not epiA CTCs, exhibited mitotic activity. Of clinical significance, CD276 and PVR, but not PD-L1, were the primary immune checkpoint genes expressed in CTCs. CD276, like PD-L1, is an immune checkpoint that suppresses tumor antigen-specific immune responses and is a target of anticancer agents such as enoblituzumab [<span>7</span>], and CAR T cells [<span>8</span>]. We propose that CD276 and PVR could serve as targets for novel immunotherapeutic strategies to eliminate CTCs.</p><p>In conclusion, we identified a novel CTC subtype, epiB, along the lineages of breast cancer progression, characterized by high levels of the stem cell master regulator CEBPA and significant mitotic activity. For the first time, we also demonstrated a link between this CTC subgroup, epiB, and the embryonic trophectoderm. EpiB CTCs may utilize elements of the TE genetic program to invade the vasculature, achieve metastasis, and implement fetal-like immune tolerance. The RNA modules involved in cancer progression that we identified, particularly those of mesenchymal and epithelial B CTCs, could have clinical applications in detecting minimal residual disease [<span>9</span>] and in identifying novel molecular targets in metastasis.</p><p>Stefano Volinia conceived and designed the study, collected the data, and performed the analysis. Stefano Volinia, Krystian Jazdzewski, Anna Terrazzan, Jeff Palatini, Tomasz S Kaminski, Eva Reali, and Nicoletta Bianchi discussed and revised the methods and results. Stefano Volinia, Krystian Jazdzewski, Anna Terrazzan, Jeff Palatini, Tomasz S. Kaminski, Eva Reali, and Nicoletta Bianchi drafted the manuscript. All authors read, revised, and approved the final manuscript.</p><p>The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.</p><p>Italy's MUR PNRR National Center for HPC, big data and quantum computing (CN00000013 CN1) and Poland's National Science Centre project OPUS 24 (2022/47/B/NZ7/03418) to Stefano Volinia. Stefano Volinia was also recipient of a Polish NAWA Ulam Scholarship (BPN/ULM/2021/1/00232) and of an University of Ferrara FAR 2024 grant. Krystian Jazdzewski was supported by Foundation for Polish Science (POIR.04.04.00-00-1DD9/16-00).</p><p>We confirm that all methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Data were obtained from public databases.</p>","PeriodicalId":9495,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Communications","volume":"45 5","pages":"500-504"},"PeriodicalIF":20.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cac2.12664","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Circulating tumor cells share RNA modules with early embryo trophectoderm and with metastatic cancer\",\"authors\":\"Stefano Volinia, Anna Terrazzan, Tomasz S. Kaminski, Krystian Jadzewski, Eva Reali, Nicoletta Bianchi, Jeff Palatini\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cac2.12664\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Metastasis is the primary cause of cancer-related deaths, accounting for an estimated 66% to 90% of fatalities [<span>1</span>]. It is a multistep process involving the dissemination of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and their colonization of distant organs [<span>2, 3</span>]. A higher number of detected CTCs in cancer patients is associated with shorter survival [<span>4</span>].</p><p>We analyzed 544 single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) profiles of bona fide CTCs, identified as keratin-positive and aneuploid, from over 3,000 putative CTC profiles available in public databases, as detailed in Supplementary Table S1. Most of the CTCs originated from patients with breast cancer (<i>n</i> = 502, 92.3%), while a smaller number were derived from patients with prostate cancer (<i>n</i> = 42). All experimental methods are described in the Supplementary Materials and Methods.</p><p>All bona fide CTCs were positive for KRT18 and negative for PTPRC (CD45), as expected. Three main CTC subgroups were identified (Supplementary Figure S1). We labeled the two epithelial (EPCAM<sup>+</sup>) subgroups as epithelial A (epiA) and epithelial B (epiB), while the third subgroup was mesenchymal (VIM<sup>+</sup>/EPCAM<sup>−</sup>). CAV1 and AXL showed the highest specificity for mesenchymal CTCs, whereas LY6E was the most distinctive gene for epiB CTCs (Supplementary Tables S2–S4). Further analysis revealed that mesenchymal and epiB, but not epiA CTCs, were actively engaged in the cell cycle, as inferred using the R package Tricycle (Supplementary Figure S1). The biological implications of these three CTC subgroups are highly relevant. Mesenchymal CTCs expressed significantly lower levels of KRT18 and other keratins, such as KRT19 and KRT7, compared to epithelial CTCs. Conversely, vimentin, another class of intermediate filaments, was highly expressed in mesenchymal CTCs. The shift from keratins to vimentin is a hallmark molecular event in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). EMT regulators ZEB1, ZEB2, and SNAI2 were upregulated in mesenchymal CTCs, indicating that EMT was responsible for their origin. These findings highlight the need to prioritize the detection and targeting of epiB and mesenchymal CTCs. PD-L1 (CD274), an important target for immunotherapy in clinical practice, was expressed in only a small fraction of mesenchymal CTCs and even less in epithelial CTCs (Supplementary Figure S2). In contrast, two other immune checkpoint genes, CD276 (B7-H3) and PVR (CD155), were highly expressed in CTCs, comparable to their expression in trophoblasts. This suggests an immuno-evasive phenotype common to most CTCs, driven by the expression of CD276 and PVR.</p><p>Is there a functional relationship between CTCs and trophoblast cells, as suggested by the co-expression of genes such as CD276, SP6, and LY6E (Supplementary Figure S3)? To address this question, we examined potential links between CTCs and the placenta or early embryo by integrating scRNA-seq profiles of CTCs with those from normal and cancerous breast tissue, early embryos and first- and second-trimester human placenta (Figure 1A, Supplemental Figures S4,S5). The UMAP plot positioned CTCs within a region enclosed by metastatic breast cancer cells, early embryonic cells, and trophoblast cells. We further explored these interrelations using divisive hierarchical spectral clustering (Figure 1B), which confirmed that CTCs, trophoblast cells, and embryonic cells share similar RNA profiles (Supplementary Figure S6 and Supplementary Table S5). To validate these findings, we mapped the CTCs onto the transcriptional landscape of embryo developmental [<span>5</span>] (Figure 1C). A subset of CTCs (<i>n</i> = 72 out of 544, <i>p</i>-value < 0.001) aligned with the trophectoderm (TE), the blastocyst cells that give rise to the trophoblast, facilitating embryo attachment and subsequent invasion to form the placenta. Notably, these TE-like CTCs were predominantly from the epiB subgroup (64 out of 72, Fisher Test <i>p</i>-value < 0.001) and were frequently in the S phase of the cell cycle (Supplementary Figure S7). To further investigate the similarity between epiB CTCs and TE, we performed a transcriptomic correlation analysis across all cell types. In the resulting correlation plot (Figure 1D), epiA CTCs clustered among breast cancer subtypes, while epiB and mesenchymal CTCs clustered with early embryonic stages. In particular, epiB CTCs showed strong similarity to TE and its precursors, pre-lineage cells. This analysis confirmed the strong relationship between epiB CTCs and the TE lineage previously observed.</p><p>We hypothesized that the similarity between epiB CTCs and early embryonic stages arises from functional convergence. Specifically, we proposed that key traits essential for the functionality of CTCs (invasiveness and immune-evasion) are encoded in the human genome as part of the trophectodermal program, which leads to the extravillous trophoblast and ultimately to the placenta. To test this hypothesis, we investigated transcription factors that were upregulated and had active gene regulatory networks (GRNs) in both epiB CTCs and TE or its precursors, pre-lineages (Figure 1E). While epiB CTCs exhibited several active GRNs, only CEBPA and ILF2 were shared with TE. Furthermore, while ILF2 was ubiquitously expressed across the dataset, the upregulation of CEBPA mRNA was predominantly restricted to epiB CTCs and TE (Supplementary Figure S8). Additionally, we identified several GRNs that appeared to be specific to either epiB or mesenchymal CTCs (Figure 1E).</p><p>Is it possible to define a cellular path for cancer establishment and progression in breast cancer, given the diversity of the scRNA-seq profiles in the dataset we assembled? To reconstruct the lineages leading from normal breast tissue, through various breast cancer subtypes, to metastatic lymph nodes and eventually to CTCs, we inferred pseudotime using Slingshot [<span>6</span>]. Although the analysis was unsupervised, the normal breast clusters were accurately identified as the starting points, culminating in the epithelial A/B CTCs via intermediate cell clusters from ER<sup>+</sup> and metastatic cancers (Figure 1F). The progression lineages for ER<sup>+</sup> and HER2<sup>+</sup> breast cancer shared common evolutionary segments, ultimately leading to the emergence of CTCs (Supplementary Table S6).</p><p>We finally identified RNA modules that could be relevant to metastatic evolution. The genes upregulated in CTCs, metastatic lymph nodes, and their respective primary tumors are shown in Supplementary Figure S9 and listed in Supplementary Table S7. Two genes associated with metastasis (ALDOA and PSMA6) were also upregulated in TE. The expression levels of RNA modules implicated in progression are displayed, superimposed on the UMAP plot, in Supplementary Figures S10–S12.</p><p>In this study, we aimed to characterize CTCs within the context of the cancer environment using scRNA-seq. We identified a mesenchymal CTC (VIM<sup>+</sup>/AXL1<sup>+</sup>) subpopulation, distinct from the larger epithelial CTCs (EPCAM<sup>+</sup>) population. Importantly, we further divided the epithelial CTCs into two divergent subgroups: epiA, characterized by high CD24/CDH1 expression, and epiB, marked by elevated levels of the stem cell master regulators SOX2/CEBPA. Notably, epiB and mesenchymal CTCs, but not epiA CTCs, exhibited mitotic activity. Of clinical significance, CD276 and PVR, but not PD-L1, were the primary immune checkpoint genes expressed in CTCs. CD276, like PD-L1, is an immune checkpoint that suppresses tumor antigen-specific immune responses and is a target of anticancer agents such as enoblituzumab [<span>7</span>], and CAR T cells [<span>8</span>]. We propose that CD276 and PVR could serve as targets for novel immunotherapeutic strategies to eliminate CTCs.</p><p>In conclusion, we identified a novel CTC subtype, epiB, along the lineages of breast cancer progression, characterized by high levels of the stem cell master regulator CEBPA and significant mitotic activity. For the first time, we also demonstrated a link between this CTC subgroup, epiB, and the embryonic trophectoderm. EpiB CTCs may utilize elements of the TE genetic program to invade the vasculature, achieve metastasis, and implement fetal-like immune tolerance. The RNA modules involved in cancer progression that we identified, particularly those of mesenchymal and epithelial B CTCs, could have clinical applications in detecting minimal residual disease [<span>9</span>] and in identifying novel molecular targets in metastasis.</p><p>Stefano Volinia conceived and designed the study, collected the data, and performed the analysis. Stefano Volinia, Krystian Jazdzewski, Anna Terrazzan, Jeff Palatini, Tomasz S Kaminski, Eva Reali, and Nicoletta Bianchi discussed and revised the methods and results. Stefano Volinia, Krystian Jazdzewski, Anna Terrazzan, Jeff Palatini, Tomasz S. Kaminski, Eva Reali, and Nicoletta Bianchi drafted the manuscript. All authors read, revised, and approved the final manuscript.</p><p>The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.</p><p>Italy's MUR PNRR National Center for HPC, big data and quantum computing (CN00000013 CN1) and Poland's National Science Centre project OPUS 24 (2022/47/B/NZ7/03418) to Stefano Volinia. Stefano Volinia was also recipient of a Polish NAWA Ulam Scholarship (BPN/ULM/2021/1/00232) and of an University of Ferrara FAR 2024 grant. Krystian Jazdzewski was supported by Foundation for Polish Science (POIR.04.04.00-00-1DD9/16-00).</p><p>We confirm that all methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Data were obtained from public databases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Communications\",\"volume\":\"45 5\",\"pages\":\"500-504\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":20.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cac2.12664\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cac2.12664\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cac2.12664","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
转移是癌症相关死亡的主要原因,估计占死亡人数的66%至90%。这是一个多步骤的过程,涉及循环肿瘤细胞(ctc)的播散及其在远处器官的定植[2,3]。癌症患者中检测到的ctc数量越多,生存期越短。我们分析了544个真实CTC的单细胞RNA测序(scRNA-seq)谱,鉴定为角蛋白阳性和非整倍体,来自公共数据库中超过3000个假设的CTC谱,详见补充表S1。大部分CTCs来源于乳腺癌患者(n = 502, 92.3%),小部分CTCs来源于前列腺癌患者(n = 42)。所有的实验方法都在补充材料和方法中描述。正如预期的那样,所有真正的CTCs都是KRT18阳性,PTPRC (CD45)阴性。确定了三个主要的CTC亚组(补充图S1)。我们将两个上皮(EPCAM+)亚组标记为上皮A (epiA)和上皮B (epiB),而第三个亚组是间充质(VIM+/EPCAM−)。CAV1和AXL对间充质ctc的特异性最高,而LY6E对epiB ctc的特异性最强(补充表S2-S4)。进一步的分析显示,间充质和epiB,而不是epiA ctc,积极参与细胞周期,正如使用R包三轮车推断的那样(补充图S1)。这三个CTC亚群的生物学意义是高度相关的。与上皮性ctc相比,间充质ctc表达KRT18和其他角蛋白(如KRT19和KRT7)的水平显著降低。相反,另一类中间丝状蛋白(vimentin)在间充质ctc中高度表达。从角蛋白到脉蛋白的转变是上皮到间质转化(EMT)过程中一个标志性的分子事件。EMT调节因子ZEB1、ZEB2和SNAI2在间质ctc中上调,表明EMT对其起源负责。这些发现强调了优先检测和靶向epiB和间质ctc的必要性。PD-L1 (CD274)是临床免疫治疗的重要靶点,仅在一小部分间充质ctc中表达,在上皮性ctc中表达更少(Supplementary Figure S2)。相比之下,另外两个免疫检查点基因CD276 (B7-H3)和PVR (CD155)在ctc中高度表达,与它们在滋养细胞中的表达相当。这表明大多数ctc常见的免疫逃避表型是由CD276和PVR的表达驱动的。CD276、SP6、LY6E等基因的共表达是否表明CTCs与滋养细胞之间存在功能关系(Supplementary Figure S3)?为了解决这个问题,我们通过将ctc的scRNA-seq图谱与正常和癌性乳腺组织、早期胚胎以及妊娠早期和中期人类胎盘的scRNA-seq图谱相结合,研究了ctc与胎盘或早期胚胎之间的潜在联系(图1A,补充图S4,S5)。UMAP图将ctc定位在转移性乳腺癌细胞、早期胚胎细胞和滋养层细胞包围的区域内。我们使用分裂的分层光谱聚类进一步探索了这些相互关系(图1B),证实了ctc、滋养细胞和胚胎细胞具有相似的RNA谱(补充图S6和补充表S5)。为了验证这些发现,我们将ctc映射到胚胎发育[5]的转录图景中(图1C)。ctc的子集(n = 72 / 544, p值<;0.001)与滋养外胚层(TE)对齐,滋养外胚层是滋养细胞的囊胚细胞,促进胚胎附着和随后的侵袭形成胎盘。值得注意的是,这些te样ctc主要来自epiB亚组(72例中有64例),Fisher检验p值<;0.001),并且经常处于细胞周期的S期(补充图S7)。为了进一步研究epiB ctc和TE之间的相似性,我们对所有细胞类型进行了转录组相关分析。在相关图中(图1D), epiA ctc聚集在乳腺癌亚型中,而epiB和间充质ctc聚集在早期胚胎阶段。特别是,epiB ctc与TE及其前体(谱系前细胞)具有很强的相似性。该分析证实了先前观察到的epiB ctc与TE谱系之间的密切关系。我们假设epiB ctc与早期胚胎阶段之间的相似性源于功能趋同。具体来说,我们提出ctc功能的关键特征(侵袭性和免疫逃避)作为滋养外胚层程序的一部分编码在人类基因组中,该程序导致外胚层滋养细胞并最终形成胎盘。 为了验证这一假设,我们研究了epiB ctc和TE或其前体,前谱系中上调并具有活性基因调控网络(grn)的转录因子(图1E)。虽然epiB ctc表现出几个活性grn,但只有CEBPA和ILF2与TE共享。此外,虽然ILF2在整个数据集中普遍表达,但CEBPA mRNA的上调主要局限于epiB ctc和TE(补充图S8)。此外,我们发现了几个grn似乎是epiB或间充质ctc特异性的(图1E)。考虑到我们收集的数据集中scRNA-seq谱的多样性,是否有可能定义乳腺癌癌症建立和进展的细胞路径?为了重建从正常乳腺组织,通过各种乳腺癌亚型,到转移性淋巴结,最终到ctc的谱系,我们使用Slingshot[6]推断假时间。虽然分析是无监督的,但正常乳腺集群被准确地确定为起点,最终通过来自ER+和转移性癌症的中间细胞集群在上皮性A/B ctc中达到顶峰(图1F)。ER+和HER2+乳腺癌的进展谱系具有共同的进化段,最终导致ctc的出现(补充表S6)。我们最终确定了可能与转移进化相关的RNA模块。ctc、转移性淋巴结及其原发肿瘤中表达上调的基因见补充图S9,列于补充表S7。两个与转移相关的基因(ALDOA和PSMA6)也在TE中上调。在补充图S10-S12中显示了与进展相关的RNA模块的表达水平,叠加在UMAP图上。在这项研究中,我们旨在使用scRNA-seq来表征癌症环境背景下的ctc。我们确定了一个间充质CTC (VIM+/AXL1+)亚群,不同于较大的上皮性CTC (EPCAM+)群体。重要的是,我们进一步将上皮性ctc分为两个不同的亚组:epiA,以高CD24/CDH1表达为特征,epiB,以干细胞主调控因子SOX2/CEBPA水平升高为特征。值得注意的是,epiB和间充质ctc表现出有丝分裂活性,而epiA ctc则没有。具有临床意义的是,CD276和PVR是ctc中表达的主要免疫检查点基因,而不是PD-L1。与PD-L1一样,CD276是一种免疫检查点,可抑制肿瘤抗原特异性免疫反应,是依那单抗[8]和CAR - T细胞[8]等抗癌药物的靶点。我们提出CD276和PVR可以作为新的免疫治疗策略的靶点来消除ctc。总之,我们在乳腺癌进展谱系中发现了一种新的CTC亚型epiB,其特征是高水平的干细胞主调控因子CEBPA和显著的有丝分裂活性。我们还首次证明了CTC亚群、epiB与胚胎滋养外胚层之间的联系。EpiB ctc可能利用TE遗传程序的元素侵入血管,实现转移,并实现胎儿样免疫耐受。我们发现的参与癌症进展的RNA模块,特别是那些间质和上皮细胞的B - ctc,可能在检测微小残留疾病[9]和识别转移中的新分子靶点方面具有临床应用。Stefano Volinia构思并设计了这项研究,收集了数据,并进行了分析。Stefano Volinia, Krystian Jazdzewski, Anna Terrazzan, Jeff Palatini, Tomasz S Kaminski, Eva Reali和Nicoletta Bianchi讨论并修改了方法和结果。Stefano Volinia, Krystian Jazdzewski, Anna Terrazzan, Jeff Palatini, Tomasz S. Kaminski, Eva Reali和Nicoletta Bianchi起草了手稿。所有作者都阅读、修改并批准了最终的手稿。作者声明在本文的研究、作者身份和/或发表方面没有潜在的利益冲突。意大利的MUR PNRR国家高性能计算、大数据和量子计算中心(CN00000013 CN1)和波兰国家科学中心项目OPUS 24 (2022/47/B/NZ7/03418)给Stefano Volinia。Stefano Volinia还获得了波兰NAWA Ulam奖学金(BPN/ULM/2021/1/00232)和费拉拉大学FAR 2024奖学金。Krystian Jazdzewski获得波兰科学基金会(POIR.04.04.00-00-1DD9/16-00)资助。我们确认所有的方法都是按照相关的指导方针和规定进行的。数据来自公共数据库。
Circulating tumor cells share RNA modules with early embryo trophectoderm and with metastatic cancer
Metastasis is the primary cause of cancer-related deaths, accounting for an estimated 66% to 90% of fatalities [1]. It is a multistep process involving the dissemination of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and their colonization of distant organs [2, 3]. A higher number of detected CTCs in cancer patients is associated with shorter survival [4].
We analyzed 544 single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) profiles of bona fide CTCs, identified as keratin-positive and aneuploid, from over 3,000 putative CTC profiles available in public databases, as detailed in Supplementary Table S1. Most of the CTCs originated from patients with breast cancer (n = 502, 92.3%), while a smaller number were derived from patients with prostate cancer (n = 42). All experimental methods are described in the Supplementary Materials and Methods.
All bona fide CTCs were positive for KRT18 and negative for PTPRC (CD45), as expected. Three main CTC subgroups were identified (Supplementary Figure S1). We labeled the two epithelial (EPCAM+) subgroups as epithelial A (epiA) and epithelial B (epiB), while the third subgroup was mesenchymal (VIM+/EPCAM−). CAV1 and AXL showed the highest specificity for mesenchymal CTCs, whereas LY6E was the most distinctive gene for epiB CTCs (Supplementary Tables S2–S4). Further analysis revealed that mesenchymal and epiB, but not epiA CTCs, were actively engaged in the cell cycle, as inferred using the R package Tricycle (Supplementary Figure S1). The biological implications of these three CTC subgroups are highly relevant. Mesenchymal CTCs expressed significantly lower levels of KRT18 and other keratins, such as KRT19 and KRT7, compared to epithelial CTCs. Conversely, vimentin, another class of intermediate filaments, was highly expressed in mesenchymal CTCs. The shift from keratins to vimentin is a hallmark molecular event in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). EMT regulators ZEB1, ZEB2, and SNAI2 were upregulated in mesenchymal CTCs, indicating that EMT was responsible for their origin. These findings highlight the need to prioritize the detection and targeting of epiB and mesenchymal CTCs. PD-L1 (CD274), an important target for immunotherapy in clinical practice, was expressed in only a small fraction of mesenchymal CTCs and even less in epithelial CTCs (Supplementary Figure S2). In contrast, two other immune checkpoint genes, CD276 (B7-H3) and PVR (CD155), were highly expressed in CTCs, comparable to their expression in trophoblasts. This suggests an immuno-evasive phenotype common to most CTCs, driven by the expression of CD276 and PVR.
Is there a functional relationship between CTCs and trophoblast cells, as suggested by the co-expression of genes such as CD276, SP6, and LY6E (Supplementary Figure S3)? To address this question, we examined potential links between CTCs and the placenta or early embryo by integrating scRNA-seq profiles of CTCs with those from normal and cancerous breast tissue, early embryos and first- and second-trimester human placenta (Figure 1A, Supplemental Figures S4,S5). The UMAP plot positioned CTCs within a region enclosed by metastatic breast cancer cells, early embryonic cells, and trophoblast cells. We further explored these interrelations using divisive hierarchical spectral clustering (Figure 1B), which confirmed that CTCs, trophoblast cells, and embryonic cells share similar RNA profiles (Supplementary Figure S6 and Supplementary Table S5). To validate these findings, we mapped the CTCs onto the transcriptional landscape of embryo developmental [5] (Figure 1C). A subset of CTCs (n = 72 out of 544, p-value < 0.001) aligned with the trophectoderm (TE), the blastocyst cells that give rise to the trophoblast, facilitating embryo attachment and subsequent invasion to form the placenta. Notably, these TE-like CTCs were predominantly from the epiB subgroup (64 out of 72, Fisher Test p-value < 0.001) and were frequently in the S phase of the cell cycle (Supplementary Figure S7). To further investigate the similarity between epiB CTCs and TE, we performed a transcriptomic correlation analysis across all cell types. In the resulting correlation plot (Figure 1D), epiA CTCs clustered among breast cancer subtypes, while epiB and mesenchymal CTCs clustered with early embryonic stages. In particular, epiB CTCs showed strong similarity to TE and its precursors, pre-lineage cells. This analysis confirmed the strong relationship between epiB CTCs and the TE lineage previously observed.
We hypothesized that the similarity between epiB CTCs and early embryonic stages arises from functional convergence. Specifically, we proposed that key traits essential for the functionality of CTCs (invasiveness and immune-evasion) are encoded in the human genome as part of the trophectodermal program, which leads to the extravillous trophoblast and ultimately to the placenta. To test this hypothesis, we investigated transcription factors that were upregulated and had active gene regulatory networks (GRNs) in both epiB CTCs and TE or its precursors, pre-lineages (Figure 1E). While epiB CTCs exhibited several active GRNs, only CEBPA and ILF2 were shared with TE. Furthermore, while ILF2 was ubiquitously expressed across the dataset, the upregulation of CEBPA mRNA was predominantly restricted to epiB CTCs and TE (Supplementary Figure S8). Additionally, we identified several GRNs that appeared to be specific to either epiB or mesenchymal CTCs (Figure 1E).
Is it possible to define a cellular path for cancer establishment and progression in breast cancer, given the diversity of the scRNA-seq profiles in the dataset we assembled? To reconstruct the lineages leading from normal breast tissue, through various breast cancer subtypes, to metastatic lymph nodes and eventually to CTCs, we inferred pseudotime using Slingshot [6]. Although the analysis was unsupervised, the normal breast clusters were accurately identified as the starting points, culminating in the epithelial A/B CTCs via intermediate cell clusters from ER+ and metastatic cancers (Figure 1F). The progression lineages for ER+ and HER2+ breast cancer shared common evolutionary segments, ultimately leading to the emergence of CTCs (Supplementary Table S6).
We finally identified RNA modules that could be relevant to metastatic evolution. The genes upregulated in CTCs, metastatic lymph nodes, and their respective primary tumors are shown in Supplementary Figure S9 and listed in Supplementary Table S7. Two genes associated with metastasis (ALDOA and PSMA6) were also upregulated in TE. The expression levels of RNA modules implicated in progression are displayed, superimposed on the UMAP plot, in Supplementary Figures S10–S12.
In this study, we aimed to characterize CTCs within the context of the cancer environment using scRNA-seq. We identified a mesenchymal CTC (VIM+/AXL1+) subpopulation, distinct from the larger epithelial CTCs (EPCAM+) population. Importantly, we further divided the epithelial CTCs into two divergent subgroups: epiA, characterized by high CD24/CDH1 expression, and epiB, marked by elevated levels of the stem cell master regulators SOX2/CEBPA. Notably, epiB and mesenchymal CTCs, but not epiA CTCs, exhibited mitotic activity. Of clinical significance, CD276 and PVR, but not PD-L1, were the primary immune checkpoint genes expressed in CTCs. CD276, like PD-L1, is an immune checkpoint that suppresses tumor antigen-specific immune responses and is a target of anticancer agents such as enoblituzumab [7], and CAR T cells [8]. We propose that CD276 and PVR could serve as targets for novel immunotherapeutic strategies to eliminate CTCs.
In conclusion, we identified a novel CTC subtype, epiB, along the lineages of breast cancer progression, characterized by high levels of the stem cell master regulator CEBPA and significant mitotic activity. For the first time, we also demonstrated a link between this CTC subgroup, epiB, and the embryonic trophectoderm. EpiB CTCs may utilize elements of the TE genetic program to invade the vasculature, achieve metastasis, and implement fetal-like immune tolerance. The RNA modules involved in cancer progression that we identified, particularly those of mesenchymal and epithelial B CTCs, could have clinical applications in detecting minimal residual disease [9] and in identifying novel molecular targets in metastasis.
Stefano Volinia conceived and designed the study, collected the data, and performed the analysis. Stefano Volinia, Krystian Jazdzewski, Anna Terrazzan, Jeff Palatini, Tomasz S Kaminski, Eva Reali, and Nicoletta Bianchi discussed and revised the methods and results. Stefano Volinia, Krystian Jazdzewski, Anna Terrazzan, Jeff Palatini, Tomasz S. Kaminski, Eva Reali, and Nicoletta Bianchi drafted the manuscript. All authors read, revised, and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Italy's MUR PNRR National Center for HPC, big data and quantum computing (CN00000013 CN1) and Poland's National Science Centre project OPUS 24 (2022/47/B/NZ7/03418) to Stefano Volinia. Stefano Volinia was also recipient of a Polish NAWA Ulam Scholarship (BPN/ULM/2021/1/00232) and of an University of Ferrara FAR 2024 grant. Krystian Jazdzewski was supported by Foundation for Polish Science (POIR.04.04.00-00-1DD9/16-00).
We confirm that all methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Data were obtained from public databases.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Communications is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal that encompasses basic, clinical, and translational cancer research. The journal welcomes submissions concerning clinical trials, epidemiology, molecular and cellular biology, and genetics.