体重适应和现代肥胖定义参数在肥胖人群躯干力量等速分析中的相关性-回顾性分析。

IF 2.2 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Clinical Obesity Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1111/cob.12736
Daniel Geissler, Andreas Lison, Christoph Schulze
{"title":"体重适应和现代肥胖定义参数在肥胖人群躯干力量等速分析中的相关性-回顾性分析。","authors":"Daniel Geissler,&nbsp;Andreas Lison,&nbsp;Christoph Schulze","doi":"10.1111/cob.12736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Pathologic values of body mass index (BMI), body weight, and waist circumference correlate with higher absolute and lower relative trunk strength. Whether waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) is appropriate for showing trunk strength differences in people with obesity and whether a continuous linear relationship exists between the increase in obesity and trunk strength is unknown. This retrospective cross-sectional study included 1174 subjects (1114 men and 60 women). Measured values included body weight, height, waist circumference, WHtR, BMI, and both absolute and body weight-adapted trunk flexor/extensor strength. Statistical analyses included <i>t</i>-tests, Welch tests, Pearson correlations, mixed-linear, and nonlinear regression analyses. Positive correlations with absolute trunk strength were found in subjects without obesity for all anthropometric parameters except WHtR. Weaker positive and partly negative correlation and linear regression coefficients were found in subjects with obesity. Nonlinear relationships were found between age, BMI, WHtR, and absolute respective body weight-adapted trunk strength. The relationship between obesity-defining measures/ indices and trunk strength is non-linear. Increasing BMI, waist circumference, or WHtR above cut-off values known from cardiovascular research is linked to a decrease or weaker increase in trunk strength. Body weight adaptation is recommended to avoid misinterpretation of apparently good absolute trunk strength values in people with obesity.</p>","PeriodicalId":10399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Obesity","volume":"15 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cob.12736","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relevance of body weight adaptation and modern obesity-defining parameters in the analysis of isokinetic trunk strength in people with obesity – A retrospective analysis\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Geissler,&nbsp;Andreas Lison,&nbsp;Christoph Schulze\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cob.12736\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Pathologic values of body mass index (BMI), body weight, and waist circumference correlate with higher absolute and lower relative trunk strength. Whether waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) is appropriate for showing trunk strength differences in people with obesity and whether a continuous linear relationship exists between the increase in obesity and trunk strength is unknown. This retrospective cross-sectional study included 1174 subjects (1114 men and 60 women). Measured values included body weight, height, waist circumference, WHtR, BMI, and both absolute and body weight-adapted trunk flexor/extensor strength. Statistical analyses included <i>t</i>-tests, Welch tests, Pearson correlations, mixed-linear, and nonlinear regression analyses. Positive correlations with absolute trunk strength were found in subjects without obesity for all anthropometric parameters except WHtR. Weaker positive and partly negative correlation and linear regression coefficients were found in subjects with obesity. Nonlinear relationships were found between age, BMI, WHtR, and absolute respective body weight-adapted trunk strength. The relationship between obesity-defining measures/ indices and trunk strength is non-linear. Increasing BMI, waist circumference, or WHtR above cut-off values known from cardiovascular research is linked to a decrease or weaker increase in trunk strength. Body weight adaptation is recommended to avoid misinterpretation of apparently good absolute trunk strength values in people with obesity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Obesity\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cob.12736\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Obesity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cob.12736\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cob.12736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

身体质量指数(BMI)、体重和腰围的病理值与较高的绝对躯干力量和较低的相对躯干力量相关。腰高比(WHtR)是否适合显示肥胖人群躯干力量的差异,肥胖增加与躯干力量之间是否存在连续的线性关系尚不清楚。这项回顾性横断面研究包括1174名受试者(1114名男性和60名女性)。测量值包括体重、身高、腰围、WHtR、BMI、绝对和与体重相适应的躯干屈肌/伸肌力量。统计分析包括t检验、Welch检验、Pearson相关性、混合线性和非线性回归分析。在非肥胖受试者中,除腰宽比外,所有人体测量参数均与绝对躯干强度呈正相关。肥胖受试者的正相关系数较弱,部分负相关系数和线性回归系数较弱。年龄、BMI、WHtR和绝对各自的体重适应躯干力量之间存在非线性关系。肥胖指标与躯干强度之间的关系是非线性的。身体质量指数、腰围或腰臀比高于心血管研究的临界值与躯干力量的减少或较弱的增加有关。建议体重适应,以避免对肥胖人群明显良好的绝对躯干力量值的误解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relevance of body weight adaptation and modern obesity-defining parameters in the analysis of isokinetic trunk strength in people with obesity – A retrospective analysis

Pathologic values of body mass index (BMI), body weight, and waist circumference correlate with higher absolute and lower relative trunk strength. Whether waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) is appropriate for showing trunk strength differences in people with obesity and whether a continuous linear relationship exists between the increase in obesity and trunk strength is unknown. This retrospective cross-sectional study included 1174 subjects (1114 men and 60 women). Measured values included body weight, height, waist circumference, WHtR, BMI, and both absolute and body weight-adapted trunk flexor/extensor strength. Statistical analyses included t-tests, Welch tests, Pearson correlations, mixed-linear, and nonlinear regression analyses. Positive correlations with absolute trunk strength were found in subjects without obesity for all anthropometric parameters except WHtR. Weaker positive and partly negative correlation and linear regression coefficients were found in subjects with obesity. Nonlinear relationships were found between age, BMI, WHtR, and absolute respective body weight-adapted trunk strength. The relationship between obesity-defining measures/ indices and trunk strength is non-linear. Increasing BMI, waist circumference, or WHtR above cut-off values known from cardiovascular research is linked to a decrease or weaker increase in trunk strength. Body weight adaptation is recommended to avoid misinterpretation of apparently good absolute trunk strength values in people with obesity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Obesity
Clinical Obesity ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Clinical Obesity is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality translational and clinical research papers and reviews focussing on obesity and its co-morbidities. Key areas of interest are: • Patient assessment, classification, diagnosis and prognosis • Drug treatments, clinical trials and supporting research • Bariatric surgery and follow-up issues • Surgical approaches to remove body fat • Pharmacological, dietary and behavioural approaches for weight loss • Clinical physiology • Clinically relevant epidemiology • Psychological aspects of obesity • Co-morbidities • Nursing and care of patients with obesity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信