机器学习引导的急性胰腺炎液体复苏改善预后

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Niwen Kong, Patrick Chang, Ira A Shulman, Ubayd Haq, Maziar Amini, Denis Nguyen, Farhaad Khan, Rachan Narala, Nisha Sharma, Daniel Wang, Tiana Thompson, Jonathan Sadik, Cameron Breze, David C Whitcomb, James L Buxbaum
{"title":"机器学习引导的急性胰腺炎液体复苏改善预后","authors":"Niwen Kong, Patrick Chang, Ira A Shulman, Ubayd Haq, Maziar Amini, Denis Nguyen, Farhaad Khan, Rachan Narala, Nisha Sharma, Daniel Wang, Tiana Thompson, Jonathan Sadik, Cameron Breze, David C Whitcomb, James L Buxbaum","doi":"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ariel Dynamic Acute Pancreatitis Tracker (ADAPT) is an artificial intelligence tool using mathematical algorithms to predict severity and manage fluid resuscitation needs based on the physiologic parameters of individual patients. Our aim was to assess whether adherence to ADAPT fluid recommendations vs standard management impacted clinical outcomes in a large prospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed patients consecutively admitted to the Los Angeles General Medical Center between June 2015 and November 2022 whose course was richly characterized by capturing more than 100 clinical variables. We inputted these data into the ADAPT system to generate resuscitation fluid recommendations and compared with the actual fluid resuscitation within the first 24 hours from presentation. The primary outcome was the difference in organ failure in those who were over-resuscitated (>500 mL) vs adequately resuscitated (within 500 mL) with respect to the ADAPT fluid recommendation. Additional outcomes included intensive care unit admission, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) at 48 hours, local complications, and pancreatitis severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1,083 patients evaluated using ADAPT, 700 were over-resuscitated, 196 were adequately resuscitated, and 187 were under-resuscitated. Adjusting for pancreatitis etiology, gender, and SIRS at admission, over-resuscitation was associated with increased respiratory failure (odd ratio [OR] 2.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-7.03) as well as intensive care unit admission (OR 2.40, 1.41-4.11), more than 48 hours of hospital length of stay (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.19-2.94), SIRS at 48 hours (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.08-2.77), and local pancreatitis complications (OR 2.93, 95% CI 1.23-6.96).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Adherence to ADAPT fluid recommendations reduces respiratory failure and other adverse outcomes compared with conventional fluid resuscitation strategies for acute pancreatitis. This validation study demonstrates the potential role of dynamic machine learning tools in acute pancreatitis management.</p>","PeriodicalId":10278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"e00825"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning-Guided Fluid Resuscitation for Acute Pancreatitis Improves Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Niwen Kong, Patrick Chang, Ira A Shulman, Ubayd Haq, Maziar Amini, Denis Nguyen, Farhaad Khan, Rachan Narala, Nisha Sharma, Daniel Wang, Tiana Thompson, Jonathan Sadik, Cameron Breze, David C Whitcomb, James L Buxbaum\",\"doi\":\"10.14309/ctg.0000000000000825\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ariel Dynamic Acute Pancreatitis Tracker (ADAPT) is an artificial intelligence tool using mathematical algorithms to predict severity and manage fluid resuscitation needs based on the physiologic parameters of individual patients. Our aim was to assess whether adherence to ADAPT fluid recommendations vs standard management impacted clinical outcomes in a large prospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed patients consecutively admitted to the Los Angeles General Medical Center between June 2015 and November 2022 whose course was richly characterized by capturing more than 100 clinical variables. We inputted these data into the ADAPT system to generate resuscitation fluid recommendations and compared with the actual fluid resuscitation within the first 24 hours from presentation. The primary outcome was the difference in organ failure in those who were over-resuscitated (>500 mL) vs adequately resuscitated (within 500 mL) with respect to the ADAPT fluid recommendation. Additional outcomes included intensive care unit admission, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) at 48 hours, local complications, and pancreatitis severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1,083 patients evaluated using ADAPT, 700 were over-resuscitated, 196 were adequately resuscitated, and 187 were under-resuscitated. Adjusting for pancreatitis etiology, gender, and SIRS at admission, over-resuscitation was associated with increased respiratory failure (odd ratio [OR] 2.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-7.03) as well as intensive care unit admission (OR 2.40, 1.41-4.11), more than 48 hours of hospital length of stay (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.19-2.94), SIRS at 48 hours (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.08-2.77), and local pancreatitis complications (OR 2.93, 95% CI 1.23-6.96).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Adherence to ADAPT fluid recommendations reduces respiratory failure and other adverse outcomes compared with conventional fluid resuscitation strategies for acute pancreatitis. This validation study demonstrates the potential role of dynamic machine learning tools in acute pancreatitis management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e00825\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020695/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000825\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000825","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:Ariel动态急性胰腺炎追踪器(ADAPT)是一种人工智能工具,使用数学算法根据个体患者的生理参数预测严重程度并管理液体复苏需求。我们的目的是评估在一个大型前瞻性队列中,依从ADAPT液体推荐与标准管理是否会影响临床结果。方法:对2015年6月至2022年11月连续入住洛杉矶综合医疗中心的患者进行分析,这些患者的病程通过捕获100多个临床变量而具有丰富的特征。我们将这些数据输入ADAPT系统,以生成复苏液体建议。和实际的24小时内的液体复苏相比。主要结局是根据ADAPT液体推荐量,超过(500cc)与充分(500cc)复苏患者器官衰竭的差异。其他结果包括ICU入院、48小时SIRS、局部并发症和胰腺炎严重程度。结果:1083例患者中,700例为过度复苏,196例为充分复苏,187例为欠复苏。调整胰腺炎病因、性别和入院时SIRS,过度复苏与呼吸衰竭增加(Odd Ratio (OR) 2.73 [95%CI 1.06, 7.03])以及ICU入院(OR 2.40[1.41, 4.11])、住院时间超过48小时(OR 1.87[1.19, 2.94])、48小时时SIRS (OR 1.73[1.08, 2.77])和局部胰腺炎并发症(OR 2.93[1.23, 6.96])相关。结论:与传统的急性胰腺炎液体复苏策略相比,坚持ADAPT液体建议可减少呼吸衰竭和其他不良后果。该验证研究证明了动态机器学习工具在急性胰腺炎管理中的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Machine Learning-Guided Fluid Resuscitation for Acute Pancreatitis Improves Outcomes.

Machine Learning-Guided Fluid Resuscitation for Acute Pancreatitis Improves Outcomes.

Machine Learning-Guided Fluid Resuscitation for Acute Pancreatitis Improves Outcomes.

Introduction: Ariel Dynamic Acute Pancreatitis Tracker (ADAPT) is an artificial intelligence tool using mathematical algorithms to predict severity and manage fluid resuscitation needs based on the physiologic parameters of individual patients. Our aim was to assess whether adherence to ADAPT fluid recommendations vs standard management impacted clinical outcomes in a large prospective cohort.

Methods: We analyzed patients consecutively admitted to the Los Angeles General Medical Center between June 2015 and November 2022 whose course was richly characterized by capturing more than 100 clinical variables. We inputted these data into the ADAPT system to generate resuscitation fluid recommendations and compared with the actual fluid resuscitation within the first 24 hours from presentation. The primary outcome was the difference in organ failure in those who were over-resuscitated (>500 mL) vs adequately resuscitated (within 500 mL) with respect to the ADAPT fluid recommendation. Additional outcomes included intensive care unit admission, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) at 48 hours, local complications, and pancreatitis severity.

Results: Among the 1,083 patients evaluated using ADAPT, 700 were over-resuscitated, 196 were adequately resuscitated, and 187 were under-resuscitated. Adjusting for pancreatitis etiology, gender, and SIRS at admission, over-resuscitation was associated with increased respiratory failure (odd ratio [OR] 2.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-7.03) as well as intensive care unit admission (OR 2.40, 1.41-4.11), more than 48 hours of hospital length of stay (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.19-2.94), SIRS at 48 hours (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.08-2.77), and local pancreatitis complications (OR 2.93, 95% CI 1.23-6.96).

Discussion: Adherence to ADAPT fluid recommendations reduces respiratory failure and other adverse outcomes compared with conventional fluid resuscitation strategies for acute pancreatitis. This validation study demonstrates the potential role of dynamic machine learning tools in acute pancreatitis management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology (CTG), published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), is a peer-reviewed open access online journal dedicated to innovative clinical work in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology. CTG hopes to fulfill an unmet need for clinicians and scientists by welcoming novel cohort studies, early-phase clinical trials, qualitative and quantitative epidemiologic research, hypothesis-generating research, studies of novel mechanisms and methodologies including public health interventions, and integration of approaches across organs and disciplines. CTG also welcomes hypothesis-generating small studies, methods papers, and translational research with clear applications to human physiology or disease. Colon and small bowel Endoscopy and novel diagnostics Esophagus Functional GI disorders Immunology of the GI tract Microbiology of the GI tract Inflammatory bowel disease Pancreas and biliary tract Liver Pathology Pediatrics Preventative medicine Nutrition/obesity Stomach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信