老年人养老意愿及其决定因素:来自西部欠发达地区的启示

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Yunhua Wang, Guorong Chai, Jiancheng Wang
{"title":"老年人养老意愿及其决定因素:来自西部欠发达地区的启示","authors":"Yunhua Wang, Guorong Chai, Jiancheng Wang","doi":"10.7189/jogh.15.04031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of the present study was to investigate the willingness of elderly individuals regarding their choice of elderly care modes in underdeveloped regions of Western China and to identify the key factors influencing the willingness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We distributed a total of 20 000 questionnaires using the multistage stratified cluster random sampling method, and successfully collected 19 460 of them. After conducting quality checks, we deemed 19 040 questionnaires valid for analysis. The survey covered seven cities, 24 counties, and 255 villages in Gansu Province. We conducted statistical analyses, including univariate χ<sup>2</sup> test, Kruskal-Wallis test and multivariate logistic regression, to assess the willingness of elderly individuals regarding care modes and the factors influencing these choices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 19 040 valid responses, 88.55% preferred home care, 5.01% opted for community care, 5.01% chose institutional care, 1.08% preferred mutual care, and 0.36% selected smart care. Elderly individuals who have a lower level of education, residence within a 15-minute walking distance to the nearest health care facility, and believe that elder care should rely on themselves or their children, etc. exhibit a higher willingness for choosing the home care mode (P < 0.05). Elderly individuals who believe that elderly care should be reliant on their children, and possess a greater knowledge for the combination of medical and elderly care, etc. exhibit a stronger willingness for choosing the community care (P < 0.05). Elderly individuals with lower educational level and lack endowment insurance, etc. exhibit a higher willingness for choosing the mutual care (P < 0.05). Elderly individuals who are not afflicted with chronic illnesses and reside within a 15-minute distance from the nearest medical centre exhibit a higher willingness for choosing the smart care mode (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In underdeveloped regions in China, home care continues to be the predominant choice among elderly individuals. However, the growing demand for diverse elderly care modes warrants attention. Multiple factors influence the willingness of elderly individuals when selecting care modes. This study offers valuable insights for policymakers, enabling government departments to implement targeted strategies and interventions to meet the diverse service needs of the elderly population effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"15 ","pages":"04031"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11758468/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Willingness and determinants of elder care modes among elderly individuals: insights from underdeveloped regions in Western China.\",\"authors\":\"Yunhua Wang, Guorong Chai, Jiancheng Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.7189/jogh.15.04031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of the present study was to investigate the willingness of elderly individuals regarding their choice of elderly care modes in underdeveloped regions of Western China and to identify the key factors influencing the willingness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We distributed a total of 20 000 questionnaires using the multistage stratified cluster random sampling method, and successfully collected 19 460 of them. After conducting quality checks, we deemed 19 040 questionnaires valid for analysis. The survey covered seven cities, 24 counties, and 255 villages in Gansu Province. We conducted statistical analyses, including univariate χ<sup>2</sup> test, Kruskal-Wallis test and multivariate logistic regression, to assess the willingness of elderly individuals regarding care modes and the factors influencing these choices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 19 040 valid responses, 88.55% preferred home care, 5.01% opted for community care, 5.01% chose institutional care, 1.08% preferred mutual care, and 0.36% selected smart care. Elderly individuals who have a lower level of education, residence within a 15-minute walking distance to the nearest health care facility, and believe that elder care should rely on themselves or their children, etc. exhibit a higher willingness for choosing the home care mode (P < 0.05). Elderly individuals who believe that elderly care should be reliant on their children, and possess a greater knowledge for the combination of medical and elderly care, etc. exhibit a stronger willingness for choosing the community care (P < 0.05). Elderly individuals with lower educational level and lack endowment insurance, etc. exhibit a higher willingness for choosing the mutual care (P < 0.05). Elderly individuals who are not afflicted with chronic illnesses and reside within a 15-minute distance from the nearest medical centre exhibit a higher willingness for choosing the smart care mode (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In underdeveloped regions in China, home care continues to be the predominant choice among elderly individuals. However, the growing demand for diverse elderly care modes warrants attention. Multiple factors influence the willingness of elderly individuals when selecting care modes. This study offers valuable insights for policymakers, enabling government departments to implement targeted strategies and interventions to meet the diverse service needs of the elderly population effectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Health\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"04031\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11758468/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04031\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在调查中国西部欠发达地区老年人养老模式选择的意愿,并找出影响其意愿的关键因素。方法:采用多阶段分层整群随机抽样法,共发放问卷2万份,成功回收问卷19 460份。经过质量检查,我们认为19040份问卷是有效的,可以进行分析。这项调查覆盖了甘肃省的7个市、24个县和255个村庄。采用单因素χ2检验、Kruskal-Wallis检验和多因素logistic回归等统计分析方法,评估老年人对护理方式的意愿及其影响因素。结果:在19040份有效问卷中,88.55%的人选择家庭护理,5.01%的人选择社区护理,5.01%的人选择机构护理,1.08%的人选择互助护理,0.36%的人选择智慧护理。受教育程度较低、居住地距离最近的医疗机构步行距离在15分钟以内、认为养老应依靠自己或子女等因素的老年人选择居家养老模式的意愿更高(P结论:在中国欠发达地区,居家养老仍然是老年人的主要选择。然而,日益增长的对多样化养老模式的需求值得关注。多种因素影响老年人个体选择养老方式的意愿。这项研究为政策制定者提供了宝贵的见解,使政府部门能够实施有针对性的策略和干预措施,有效地满足老年人口的不同服务需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Willingness and determinants of elder care modes among elderly individuals: insights from underdeveloped regions in Western China.

Background: The aim of the present study was to investigate the willingness of elderly individuals regarding their choice of elderly care modes in underdeveloped regions of Western China and to identify the key factors influencing the willingness.

Methods: We distributed a total of 20 000 questionnaires using the multistage stratified cluster random sampling method, and successfully collected 19 460 of them. After conducting quality checks, we deemed 19 040 questionnaires valid for analysis. The survey covered seven cities, 24 counties, and 255 villages in Gansu Province. We conducted statistical analyses, including univariate χ2 test, Kruskal-Wallis test and multivariate logistic regression, to assess the willingness of elderly individuals regarding care modes and the factors influencing these choices.

Results: Among the 19 040 valid responses, 88.55% preferred home care, 5.01% opted for community care, 5.01% chose institutional care, 1.08% preferred mutual care, and 0.36% selected smart care. Elderly individuals who have a lower level of education, residence within a 15-minute walking distance to the nearest health care facility, and believe that elder care should rely on themselves or their children, etc. exhibit a higher willingness for choosing the home care mode (P < 0.05). Elderly individuals who believe that elderly care should be reliant on their children, and possess a greater knowledge for the combination of medical and elderly care, etc. exhibit a stronger willingness for choosing the community care (P < 0.05). Elderly individuals with lower educational level and lack endowment insurance, etc. exhibit a higher willingness for choosing the mutual care (P < 0.05). Elderly individuals who are not afflicted with chronic illnesses and reside within a 15-minute distance from the nearest medical centre exhibit a higher willingness for choosing the smart care mode (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: In underdeveloped regions in China, home care continues to be the predominant choice among elderly individuals. However, the growing demand for diverse elderly care modes warrants attention. Multiple factors influence the willingness of elderly individuals when selecting care modes. This study offers valuable insights for policymakers, enabling government departments to implement targeted strategies and interventions to meet the diverse service needs of the elderly population effectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信