Meek法微色素沉着皮肤移植的安全性和有效性。

IF 1.4 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
International Journal of Burns and Trauma Pub Date : 2024-12-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62347/HFPU3214
Diana Rafieezadeh, Mohammadjavad Abbaspour
{"title":"Meek法微色素沉着皮肤移植的安全性和有效性。","authors":"Diana Rafieezadeh, Mohammadjavad Abbaspour","doi":"10.62347/HFPU3214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The management of complex burn injuries has evolved significantly, with various surgical techniques developed to improve outcomes. This review examines the evolution of these methods, focusing particularly on mesh grafting and the Meek technique. While mesh grafting is effective, it poses challenges such as limited graft coverage and a high demand for autologous skin. In contrast, the Meek technique, a specialized method reintroduced in 1993, offers notable advantages for extensive burns by achieving higher skin expansion ratios of up to 1:9 and reducing the need for large donor sites. The Meek technique uses a meshing device to create tiny perforations in small skin grafts, facilitating their expansion to cover larger wound areas and improving healing outcomes. Recent studies highlight its effectiveness across various burn severities and age groups, especially when combined with Cultured Epithelial Autografts (CEA). Additionally, bioengineering advancements like Biobrane offer temporary skin substitutes to aid burn wound healing in pediatric cases, though they ultimately require replacement with autografts. While the Meek technique presents certain challenges, such as a 6-day delay before applying allografts, it remains a robust alternative to traditional methods. Clinical experience indicates that the Meek technique, particularly when combined with CEA, can achieve superior results for severe burns compared to conventional mesh grafting. This review emphasizes the Meek technique's potential as a valuable tool in burn wound management, offering a promising approach for improving patient outcomes in complex burn injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":45488,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","volume":"14 6","pages":"107-114"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751555/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and effectiveness of micropigmentation skin grafting using the Meek method.\",\"authors\":\"Diana Rafieezadeh, Mohammadjavad Abbaspour\",\"doi\":\"10.62347/HFPU3214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The management of complex burn injuries has evolved significantly, with various surgical techniques developed to improve outcomes. This review examines the evolution of these methods, focusing particularly on mesh grafting and the Meek technique. While mesh grafting is effective, it poses challenges such as limited graft coverage and a high demand for autologous skin. In contrast, the Meek technique, a specialized method reintroduced in 1993, offers notable advantages for extensive burns by achieving higher skin expansion ratios of up to 1:9 and reducing the need for large donor sites. The Meek technique uses a meshing device to create tiny perforations in small skin grafts, facilitating their expansion to cover larger wound areas and improving healing outcomes. Recent studies highlight its effectiveness across various burn severities and age groups, especially when combined with Cultured Epithelial Autografts (CEA). Additionally, bioengineering advancements like Biobrane offer temporary skin substitutes to aid burn wound healing in pediatric cases, though they ultimately require replacement with autografts. While the Meek technique presents certain challenges, such as a 6-day delay before applying allografts, it remains a robust alternative to traditional methods. Clinical experience indicates that the Meek technique, particularly when combined with CEA, can achieve superior results for severe burns compared to conventional mesh grafting. This review emphasizes the Meek technique's potential as a valuable tool in burn wound management, offering a promising approach for improving patient outcomes in complex burn injuries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Burns and Trauma\",\"volume\":\"14 6\",\"pages\":\"107-114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11751555/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Burns and Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62347/HFPU3214\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Burns and Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/HFPU3214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

复杂烧伤的处理已经有了显著的发展,各种外科技术的发展,以改善结果。本文回顾了这些方法的发展,特别关注网状嫁接和Meek技术。虽然网状移植是有效的,但它提出了诸如移植物覆盖范围有限和对自体皮肤的高需求等挑战。相比之下,Meek技术,1993年重新引入的一种专门方法,通过实现高达1:9的更高皮肤扩张比和减少对大供体部位的需求,为大面积烧伤提供了显着的优势。Meek技术使用网状装置在小的皮肤移植物上制造微小的穿孔,促进它们扩展到覆盖更大的伤口区域,提高愈合效果。最近的研究强调了其在不同烧伤严重程度和年龄组中的有效性,特别是当与自体培养上皮(CEA)联合使用时。此外,生物工程的进步,如生物膜提供临时皮肤替代品,以帮助儿童烧伤伤口愈合,尽管它们最终需要用自体移植物代替。虽然Meek技术存在一定的挑战,例如在应用同种异体移植物之前要延迟6天,但它仍然是传统方法的可靠替代方案。临床经验表明,Meek技术,特别是与CEA结合使用时,与传统的网状植入术相比,可以获得更好的治疗严重烧伤的效果。这篇综述强调Meek技术作为烧伤创面管理的一种有价值的工具的潜力,为改善复杂烧伤患者的预后提供了一种有希望的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and effectiveness of micropigmentation skin grafting using the Meek method.

The management of complex burn injuries has evolved significantly, with various surgical techniques developed to improve outcomes. This review examines the evolution of these methods, focusing particularly on mesh grafting and the Meek technique. While mesh grafting is effective, it poses challenges such as limited graft coverage and a high demand for autologous skin. In contrast, the Meek technique, a specialized method reintroduced in 1993, offers notable advantages for extensive burns by achieving higher skin expansion ratios of up to 1:9 and reducing the need for large donor sites. The Meek technique uses a meshing device to create tiny perforations in small skin grafts, facilitating their expansion to cover larger wound areas and improving healing outcomes. Recent studies highlight its effectiveness across various burn severities and age groups, especially when combined with Cultured Epithelial Autografts (CEA). Additionally, bioengineering advancements like Biobrane offer temporary skin substitutes to aid burn wound healing in pediatric cases, though they ultimately require replacement with autografts. While the Meek technique presents certain challenges, such as a 6-day delay before applying allografts, it remains a robust alternative to traditional methods. Clinical experience indicates that the Meek technique, particularly when combined with CEA, can achieve superior results for severe burns compared to conventional mesh grafting. This review emphasizes the Meek technique's potential as a valuable tool in burn wound management, offering a promising approach for improving patient outcomes in complex burn injuries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信