[应用缝合锚钉治疗髌骨下极撕脱性骨折]。

Q3 Medicine
Hongqing He, Ningkai Li, Meng Liu, Jiating Lin, Qiang Wang, Yinchang Zhang
{"title":"[应用缝合锚钉治疗髌骨下极撕脱性骨折]。","authors":"Hongqing He, Ningkai Li, Meng Liu, Jiating Lin, Qiang Wang, Yinchang Zhang","doi":"10.7507/1002-1892.202409080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the feasibility and effectiveness of suture anchor double-pulley technique combined with suture three-dimensional binding via bone tunnel technique for avulsion fractures of the inferior pole of the patella.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A clinical data of 38 patients with avulsion fractures of the inferior pole of the patella, who met the selective criteria and were admitted between September 2021 and April 2023, was retrospectively analyzed. The fractures were treated with suture anchor double-pulley technique combined with suture three-dimensional binding via bone tunnel technique in 18 cases (group A) and steel wire tension-band fixation in 20 cases (group B). There was no significant difference in terms of age, gender, cause of fracture, side of fracture, and disease duration between the two groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05). The length of incision, operation time, occurrence of complications, the range of motion of knee joint, and Böstman score of knee joint at last follow-up were recorded. The fracture healing was evaluated through X-ray films and the time of fracture healing was recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All incisions healed by first intention. The length of incision was significantly shorter in group A than in group B ( <i>P</i><0.05). There was no significant difference in the operation time between the two groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05). All patients were followed up 12-24 months (mean, 16.1 months). X-ray films showed that all fractures healed and there was no significant difference in the healing time between the two groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05). At last follow-up, the range of motion and Böstman score of the knee joint in group A were significantly better than those in group B ( <i>P</i><0.05). During follow-up, 1 patient (5.6%) in group A had one anchor mild prolapse and 3 patients (15.0%) occured internal fixation irritation in group B. But there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For the avulsion fractures of the inferior pole of the patella, the suture anchor double-pulley technique combined with suture three-dimensional binding via bone tunnel technique has advantages of reliable fixation, small incision, avoidance of secondary operation to remove internal fixator, and fewer complications, with definite effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":23979,"journal":{"name":"中国修复重建外科杂志","volume":"39 1","pages":"26-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11757969/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Three-dimensional binding treatment for avulsion fractures of inferior pole of patella utilizing suture anchor].\",\"authors\":\"Hongqing He, Ningkai Li, Meng Liu, Jiating Lin, Qiang Wang, Yinchang Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.7507/1002-1892.202409080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the feasibility and effectiveness of suture anchor double-pulley technique combined with suture three-dimensional binding via bone tunnel technique for avulsion fractures of the inferior pole of the patella.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A clinical data of 38 patients with avulsion fractures of the inferior pole of the patella, who met the selective criteria and were admitted between September 2021 and April 2023, was retrospectively analyzed. The fractures were treated with suture anchor double-pulley technique combined with suture three-dimensional binding via bone tunnel technique in 18 cases (group A) and steel wire tension-band fixation in 20 cases (group B). There was no significant difference in terms of age, gender, cause of fracture, side of fracture, and disease duration between the two groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05). The length of incision, operation time, occurrence of complications, the range of motion of knee joint, and Böstman score of knee joint at last follow-up were recorded. The fracture healing was evaluated through X-ray films and the time of fracture healing was recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All incisions healed by first intention. The length of incision was significantly shorter in group A than in group B ( <i>P</i><0.05). There was no significant difference in the operation time between the two groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05). All patients were followed up 12-24 months (mean, 16.1 months). X-ray films showed that all fractures healed and there was no significant difference in the healing time between the two groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05). At last follow-up, the range of motion and Böstman score of the knee joint in group A were significantly better than those in group B ( <i>P</i><0.05). During follow-up, 1 patient (5.6%) in group A had one anchor mild prolapse and 3 patients (15.0%) occured internal fixation irritation in group B. But there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups ( <i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For the avulsion fractures of the inferior pole of the patella, the suture anchor double-pulley technique combined with suture three-dimensional binding via bone tunnel technique has advantages of reliable fixation, small incision, avoidance of secondary operation to remove internal fixator, and fewer complications, with definite effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国修复重建外科杂志\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"26-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11757969/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国修复重建外科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.202409080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国修复重建外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.202409080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨缝合锚钉双滑轮技术联合骨隧道缝合三维绑定技术治疗髌骨下极撕脱骨折的可行性和有效性。方法:回顾性分析2021年9月至2023年4月收治的髌骨下极撕脱性骨折38例患者的临床资料。A组18例采用缝合锚钉双滑轮技术联合骨隧道缝合三维绑定,B组20例采用钢丝张力带固定。两组患者在年龄、性别、骨折原因、骨折侧边、病程等方面差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。记录切口长度、手术时间、并发症发生情况、膝关节活动范围及最后随访时膝关节Böstman评分。通过x线片评估骨折愈合情况,记录骨折愈合时间。结果:所有切口一期愈合。A组切口长度明显短于B组(p < 0.05)。所有患者随访12-24个月(平均16.1个月)。x线片显示两组骨折均愈合,愈合时间差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。最后随访时,A组膝关节活动度及Böstman评分均显著优于B组(p < 0.05)。结论:对于髌骨下极撕脱性骨折,缝合锚钉双滑轮技术联合骨隧道缝合三维绑定技术固定可靠,切口小,避免二次手术取出内固定物,并发症少,疗效肯定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Three-dimensional binding treatment for avulsion fractures of inferior pole of patella utilizing suture anchor].

Objective: To explore the feasibility and effectiveness of suture anchor double-pulley technique combined with suture three-dimensional binding via bone tunnel technique for avulsion fractures of the inferior pole of the patella.

Methods: A clinical data of 38 patients with avulsion fractures of the inferior pole of the patella, who met the selective criteria and were admitted between September 2021 and April 2023, was retrospectively analyzed. The fractures were treated with suture anchor double-pulley technique combined with suture three-dimensional binding via bone tunnel technique in 18 cases (group A) and steel wire tension-band fixation in 20 cases (group B). There was no significant difference in terms of age, gender, cause of fracture, side of fracture, and disease duration between the two groups ( P>0.05). The length of incision, operation time, occurrence of complications, the range of motion of knee joint, and Böstman score of knee joint at last follow-up were recorded. The fracture healing was evaluated through X-ray films and the time of fracture healing was recorded.

Results: All incisions healed by first intention. The length of incision was significantly shorter in group A than in group B ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the operation time between the two groups ( P>0.05). All patients were followed up 12-24 months (mean, 16.1 months). X-ray films showed that all fractures healed and there was no significant difference in the healing time between the two groups ( P>0.05). At last follow-up, the range of motion and Böstman score of the knee joint in group A were significantly better than those in group B ( P<0.05). During follow-up, 1 patient (5.6%) in group A had one anchor mild prolapse and 3 patients (15.0%) occured internal fixation irritation in group B. But there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups ( P>0.05).

Conclusion: For the avulsion fractures of the inferior pole of the patella, the suture anchor double-pulley technique combined with suture three-dimensional binding via bone tunnel technique has advantages of reliable fixation, small incision, avoidance of secondary operation to remove internal fixator, and fewer complications, with definite effectiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中国修复重建外科杂志
中国修复重建外科杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11334
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信