成年糖尿病酮症酸中毒患者入院时淋巴细胞- c反应蛋白比值预测疾病进展和ICU入院情况。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Yi-Jia Hu, Shu-Xiao Qiu, Jian-Nan Zhang, Qi-Qi Lai, Yi-Lu Lin, Lin-Qiong Liu, Di Wu, Hui-Ying Liu, Huan Meng, Jia-Xi Xu, Jia-Ning Zhang, Bo-Wen Liu, Yan Gao, Kai Kang, Yang Gao
{"title":"成年糖尿病酮症酸中毒患者入院时淋巴细胞- c反应蛋白比值预测疾病进展和ICU入院情况。","authors":"Yi-Jia Hu, Shu-Xiao Qiu, Jian-Nan Zhang, Qi-Qi Lai, Yi-Lu Lin, Lin-Qiong Liu, Di Wu, Hui-Ying Liu, Huan Meng, Jia-Xi Xu, Jia-Ning Zhang, Bo-Wen Liu, Yan Gao, Kai Kang, Yang Gao","doi":"10.1038/s41598-024-84054-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate whether lymphocyte-C-reactive protein ratio (LCR) upon admission can predict disease progression and intensive care unit (ICU) admission in adult patients with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). A single-center retrospective study was conducted, including adult DKA patients admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University between March 2018 and March 2023. Multiple demographic and clinical data were collected from the medical records upon admission and during hospitalization. Subsequently, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score and LCR were calculated based on relevant clinical parameters within 24 h of admission. These indicators were compared among different disease severity groups, and factors related to severe DKA, concurrent acute kidney injury (AKI), and ICU admission were further analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the sensitivity, specificity, area under the ROC curve (AUC), and cut-off value of LCR. A total of 271 adult DKA patients were enrolled and categorized into three groups: mild group (n = 42), moderate group (n = 64), and severe group (n = 165). Significant differences in demographic and clinical data were observed among these groups. Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score, LCR, pH, and bicarbonate (HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>) were identified as protective factors for severe DKA. Conversely, SOFA score, neutrophil count (NEUT), serum creatinine (SCr), and glucose (GLU) were risk factors for concurrent AKI. Concurrent AKI and SOFA score were risk factors for ICU admission, while pH was a protective factor. The areas under the ROC curve (AUC) of LCR to classify adult DKA patients into mild group, severe group, and ICU admission were 0.679, 0.718, and 0.621, respectively, with cut-off value of 212.80, 96.16, and 63.35, sensitivity of 54.8%, 76.4%, and 78.9%, and specificity of 76.0%, 62.4%, and 46.3%. LCR upon admission provides great potential to predict disease progression and ICU admission in adult patients with DKA.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"3012"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759335/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lymphocyte-C-reactive protein ratio upon admission to predict disease progression and ICU admission in adult patients with diabetic ketoacidosis.\",\"authors\":\"Yi-Jia Hu, Shu-Xiao Qiu, Jian-Nan Zhang, Qi-Qi Lai, Yi-Lu Lin, Lin-Qiong Liu, Di Wu, Hui-Ying Liu, Huan Meng, Jia-Xi Xu, Jia-Ning Zhang, Bo-Wen Liu, Yan Gao, Kai Kang, Yang Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-024-84054-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate whether lymphocyte-C-reactive protein ratio (LCR) upon admission can predict disease progression and intensive care unit (ICU) admission in adult patients with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). A single-center retrospective study was conducted, including adult DKA patients admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University between March 2018 and March 2023. Multiple demographic and clinical data were collected from the medical records upon admission and during hospitalization. Subsequently, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score and LCR were calculated based on relevant clinical parameters within 24 h of admission. These indicators were compared among different disease severity groups, and factors related to severe DKA, concurrent acute kidney injury (AKI), and ICU admission were further analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the sensitivity, specificity, area under the ROC curve (AUC), and cut-off value of LCR. A total of 271 adult DKA patients were enrolled and categorized into three groups: mild group (n = 42), moderate group (n = 64), and severe group (n = 165). Significant differences in demographic and clinical data were observed among these groups. Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score, LCR, pH, and bicarbonate (HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>) were identified as protective factors for severe DKA. Conversely, SOFA score, neutrophil count (NEUT), serum creatinine (SCr), and glucose (GLU) were risk factors for concurrent AKI. Concurrent AKI and SOFA score were risk factors for ICU admission, while pH was a protective factor. The areas under the ROC curve (AUC) of LCR to classify adult DKA patients into mild group, severe group, and ICU admission were 0.679, 0.718, and 0.621, respectively, with cut-off value of 212.80, 96.16, and 63.35, sensitivity of 54.8%, 76.4%, and 78.9%, and specificity of 76.0%, 62.4%, and 46.3%. LCR upon admission provides great potential to predict disease progression and ICU admission in adult patients with DKA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"3012\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759335/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-84054-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-84054-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨成人糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)患者入院时的淋巴细胞- c反应蛋白比率(LCR)是否能预测疾病进展和入住重症监护病房(ICU)。本研究采用单中心回顾性研究,纳入2018年3月至2023年3月在哈尔滨医科大学第一附属医院住院的成人DKA患者。从入院时和住院期间的医疗记录中收集了多种人口统计学和临床数据。在入院24 h内根据相关临床参数计算序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分和LCR。将这些指标在不同疾病严重程度组间进行比较,并进一步分析严重DKA、并发急性肾损伤(AKI)、ICU入院的相关因素。进行受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,确定LCR的敏感性、特异性、ROC曲线下面积(AUC)和截止值。共纳入271例成人DKA患者,分为轻度组(n = 42)、中度组(n = 64)和重度组(n = 165)。在这些组中观察到人口统计学和临床数据的显著差异。格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)评分、LCR、pH和碳酸氢盐(HCO3-)被确定为重度DKA的保护因素。相反,SOFA评分、中性粒细胞计数(NEUT)、血清肌酐(SCr)和葡萄糖(GLU)是并发AKI的危险因素。并发AKI和SOFA评分是ICU入院的危险因素,pH值为保护因素。LCR将成人DKA患者分为轻度组、重度组和ICU入院的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.679、0.718和0.621,临界值分别为212.80、96.16和63.35,敏感性分别为54.8%、76.4%和78.9%,特异性分别为76.0%、62.4%和46.3%。入院时的LCR对成年DKA患者的疾病进展和ICU入住有很大的预测潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Lymphocyte-C-reactive protein ratio upon admission to predict disease progression and ICU admission in adult patients with diabetic ketoacidosis.

Lymphocyte-C-reactive protein ratio upon admission to predict disease progression and ICU admission in adult patients with diabetic ketoacidosis.

Lymphocyte-C-reactive protein ratio upon admission to predict disease progression and ICU admission in adult patients with diabetic ketoacidosis.

Lymphocyte-C-reactive protein ratio upon admission to predict disease progression and ICU admission in adult patients with diabetic ketoacidosis.

This study aimed to investigate whether lymphocyte-C-reactive protein ratio (LCR) upon admission can predict disease progression and intensive care unit (ICU) admission in adult patients with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). A single-center retrospective study was conducted, including adult DKA patients admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University between March 2018 and March 2023. Multiple demographic and clinical data were collected from the medical records upon admission and during hospitalization. Subsequently, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score and LCR were calculated based on relevant clinical parameters within 24 h of admission. These indicators were compared among different disease severity groups, and factors related to severe DKA, concurrent acute kidney injury (AKI), and ICU admission were further analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the sensitivity, specificity, area under the ROC curve (AUC), and cut-off value of LCR. A total of 271 adult DKA patients were enrolled and categorized into three groups: mild group (n = 42), moderate group (n = 64), and severe group (n = 165). Significant differences in demographic and clinical data were observed among these groups. Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score, LCR, pH, and bicarbonate (HCO3-) were identified as protective factors for severe DKA. Conversely, SOFA score, neutrophil count (NEUT), serum creatinine (SCr), and glucose (GLU) were risk factors for concurrent AKI. Concurrent AKI and SOFA score were risk factors for ICU admission, while pH was a protective factor. The areas under the ROC curve (AUC) of LCR to classify adult DKA patients into mild group, severe group, and ICU admission were 0.679, 0.718, and 0.621, respectively, with cut-off value of 212.80, 96.16, and 63.35, sensitivity of 54.8%, 76.4%, and 78.9%, and specificity of 76.0%, 62.4%, and 46.3%. LCR upon admission provides great potential to predict disease progression and ICU admission in adult patients with DKA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信