{"title":"金杯口服液治疗特发性肺纤维化:随机安慰剂对照试验。","authors":"Aijun Zhang, Kangkang Han, Fangfang Chen, Xiao Chen, Jun Wang, Yikai Niu, Zhaoqiu Hu, Chunyan Zheng, Liping Han, Zhaoqing Meng, Liangzong Zhang, Qingcui Xu, Cuixiang Yu, Wei Zhang, Quanguo Li, Ningning Tao, Weixiang Kong, Fei Liu, Min Wang, Juanjuan Jiang, Honglin Li, LongBin Pang, Huaichen Li","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-87474-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The traditional Chinese medicine compound preparation known as Jinbei Oral Liquid (JBOL) consists of 12 herbs, including Astragalus membranaceus (Fisch.) Bge, Codonopsis pilosula (Franch.) Nannf, et al. Having been used for over 30 years in the treatment of pulmonary diseases, JBOL was evaluated in this study in order to assess its effect on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis as well as its safety (ChiCTR2000035351, Chictr.org.cn.09/08/2020). A double-blind, multicenter, randomized, proof-of-concept trial was conducted to assess the efficacy of oral JBOL 40 ml and Corbrin Capsules 1 g compared to a placebo and Corbrin Capsules in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Over a 26-week period, patients received the active treatment or placebo three times daily, in a 1:1 ratio. This clinical study uses a randomized method, with a cycle of every 4 patients. TCM doctors at or above the deputy director level of the research center conduct TCM dialectics on IPF patients. To assess efficacy, over the duration of the trial, we measured serial changes in a composite indicator encompassing time to first acute exacerbation of IPF (first hospitalization or death due to respiratory cause), total lung capacity (TLC) (mL), predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%), forced vital capacity (FVC) (mL), predicted diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (predicted DLco%), 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score, and arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO<sub>2</sub>) from baseline to week 26 versus placebo. A total of 103 patients were screened, and 72 received the study medication. Of these, 68 patients were included in the analysis set, with 34 receiving JBOL and 34 receiving a placebo. After 26 weeks, a statistically significant reduction in total lung capacity (TLC) was observed for the JBOL group, with a change of 136 mL compared to -523 mL for the placebo group (difference 659 mL, 95% CI -1215 to -104 mL, p = 0.02). The study found that the change in FVC% predicted was - 1.48% and - 3.58% for the JBOL and placebo groups, respectively (difference of 2.10%, 95% CI -7.13 to 2.93, p = 0.41). Additionally the differences between the two groups in changes in FVC (mL), DLCO % predicted, PaO<sub>2</sub> (mmHg) measures were - 67 mL (95% CI -238 to 104), -7.74% (95% CI -17.26 to 1.79), and - 3.57 mmHg (95% CI -10.02 to 2.87), respectively. Treatment with JBOL compared to placebo resulted in sequential changes in acute exacerbation, with no significant difference in SGRQ scores. It was not found that there was a statistically significant difference between the JBOL and placebo groups in TEAE reporting and serious TEAE reporting. Compared to the placebo group, there was a statistically significant reduction (p < 0.021) in TLC (mL) after 26 weeks for JBOL. The rates of FVC % predicted, FVC, DLCO % predicted, and PaO<sub>2</sub> in the group treatment with JBOL were numerically lower than those in the placebo treatment group, although these differences did not reach statistical significance. JBOL exhibited comparable safety to placebo. This study has preliminarily shown the efficacy and safety of JBOL for IPF, but this is an exploratory clinical trial, more patient-involved studies should be needed in the near future.Trial registration: Chictr.org.cn ChiCTR2000035351; the trial was prospective clinical studies registered on August 9, 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"3007"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759330/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Jinbei oral liquid for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Aijun Zhang, Kangkang Han, Fangfang Chen, Xiao Chen, Jun Wang, Yikai Niu, Zhaoqiu Hu, Chunyan Zheng, Liping Han, Zhaoqing Meng, Liangzong Zhang, Qingcui Xu, Cuixiang Yu, Wei Zhang, Quanguo Li, Ningning Tao, Weixiang Kong, Fei Liu, Min Wang, Juanjuan Jiang, Honglin Li, LongBin Pang, Huaichen Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-87474-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The traditional Chinese medicine compound preparation known as Jinbei Oral Liquid (JBOL) consists of 12 herbs, including Astragalus membranaceus (Fisch.) Bge, Codonopsis pilosula (Franch.) Nannf, et al. Having been used for over 30 years in the treatment of pulmonary diseases, JBOL was evaluated in this study in order to assess its effect on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis as well as its safety (ChiCTR2000035351, Chictr.org.cn.09/08/2020). A double-blind, multicenter, randomized, proof-of-concept trial was conducted to assess the efficacy of oral JBOL 40 ml and Corbrin Capsules 1 g compared to a placebo and Corbrin Capsules in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Over a 26-week period, patients received the active treatment or placebo three times daily, in a 1:1 ratio. This clinical study uses a randomized method, with a cycle of every 4 patients. TCM doctors at or above the deputy director level of the research center conduct TCM dialectics on IPF patients. To assess efficacy, over the duration of the trial, we measured serial changes in a composite indicator encompassing time to first acute exacerbation of IPF (first hospitalization or death due to respiratory cause), total lung capacity (TLC) (mL), predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%), forced vital capacity (FVC) (mL), predicted diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (predicted DLco%), 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score, and arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO<sub>2</sub>) from baseline to week 26 versus placebo. A total of 103 patients were screened, and 72 received the study medication. Of these, 68 patients were included in the analysis set, with 34 receiving JBOL and 34 receiving a placebo. After 26 weeks, a statistically significant reduction in total lung capacity (TLC) was observed for the JBOL group, with a change of 136 mL compared to -523 mL for the placebo group (difference 659 mL, 95% CI -1215 to -104 mL, p = 0.02). The study found that the change in FVC% predicted was - 1.48% and - 3.58% for the JBOL and placebo groups, respectively (difference of 2.10%, 95% CI -7.13 to 2.93, p = 0.41). Additionally the differences between the two groups in changes in FVC (mL), DLCO % predicted, PaO<sub>2</sub> (mmHg) measures were - 67 mL (95% CI -238 to 104), -7.74% (95% CI -17.26 to 1.79), and - 3.57 mmHg (95% CI -10.02 to 2.87), respectively. Treatment with JBOL compared to placebo resulted in sequential changes in acute exacerbation, with no significant difference in SGRQ scores. It was not found that there was a statistically significant difference between the JBOL and placebo groups in TEAE reporting and serious TEAE reporting. Compared to the placebo group, there was a statistically significant reduction (p < 0.021) in TLC (mL) after 26 weeks for JBOL. The rates of FVC % predicted, FVC, DLCO % predicted, and PaO<sub>2</sub> in the group treatment with JBOL were numerically lower than those in the placebo treatment group, although these differences did not reach statistical significance. JBOL exhibited comparable safety to placebo. This study has preliminarily shown the efficacy and safety of JBOL for IPF, but this is an exploratory clinical trial, more patient-involved studies should be needed in the near future.Trial registration: Chictr.org.cn ChiCTR2000035351; the trial was prospective clinical studies registered on August 9, 2020.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"3007\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759330/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87474-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87474-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
中药复方制剂金杯口服液(JBOL)由12种草药组成,包括黄芪(黄芪)。(法语:Codonopsis pilosula)Nannf等人。JBOL用于肺部疾病治疗已有30多年的历史,本研究对其进行了评估,以评估其对特发性肺纤维化的疗效及其安全性(ChiCTR2000035351, Chictr.org.cn.09/08/2020)。进行了一项双盲、多中心、随机、概念验证试验,以评估口服JBOL 40ml和Corbrin胶囊1g与安慰剂和Corbrin胶囊在特发性肺纤维化(IPF)患者中的疗效。在26周的时间里,患者每天以1:1的比例接受三次积极治疗或安慰剂。本临床研究采用随机方法,每4例患者为一个周期。研究中心副主任级以上中医医师对IPF患者进行中医辩证法治疗。为了评估疗效,在试验期间,我们测量了一系列综合指标的变化,包括到IPF首次急性加重(首次住院或因呼吸原因死亡)的时间、总肺活量(TLC) (mL)、预测用力肺活量(FVC%)、用力肺活量(FVC) (mL)、预测肺部一氧化碳弥散量(DLco%)、6分钟步行距离(6MWD)、圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)总分、从基线到第26周的动脉氧分压(PaO2)与安慰剂相比。共有103名患者接受了筛查,其中72人接受了研究药物治疗。其中,68例患者被纳入分析集,其中34例接受JBOL治疗,34例接受安慰剂治疗。26周后,观察到JBOL组的总肺活量(TLC)有统计学意义的降低,与安慰剂组的-523 mL相比,变化了136 mL(差异659 mL, 95% CI -1215至-104 mL, p = 0.02)。研究发现,JBOL组和安慰剂组预测FVC%的变化分别为- 1.48%和- 3.58%(差异为2.10%,95% CI为-7.13至2.93,p = 0.41)。此外,两组之间FVC (mL)、DLCO %预测值、PaO2 (mmHg)变化的差异分别为- 67 mL (95% CI -238至104)、-7.74% (95% CI -17.26至1.79)和- 3.57 mmHg (95% CI -10.02至2.87)。与安慰剂相比,JBOL治疗导致急性加重的顺序变化,SGRQ评分无显著差异。未发现JBOL组与安慰剂组在TEAE报告和严重TEAE报告方面存在统计学差异。与安慰剂组相比,JBOL治疗组的p < 2,数值上低于安慰剂组,但差异未达到统计学意义。JBOL的安全性与安慰剂相当。本研究初步显示了JBOL治疗IPF的有效性和安全性,但这是一项探索性临床试验,在不久的将来还需要更多的患者参与的研究。试验注册:chictr.org ChiCTR2000035351;该试验为2020年8月9日注册的前瞻性临床研究。
Jinbei oral liquid for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.
The traditional Chinese medicine compound preparation known as Jinbei Oral Liquid (JBOL) consists of 12 herbs, including Astragalus membranaceus (Fisch.) Bge, Codonopsis pilosula (Franch.) Nannf, et al. Having been used for over 30 years in the treatment of pulmonary diseases, JBOL was evaluated in this study in order to assess its effect on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis as well as its safety (ChiCTR2000035351, Chictr.org.cn.09/08/2020). A double-blind, multicenter, randomized, proof-of-concept trial was conducted to assess the efficacy of oral JBOL 40 ml and Corbrin Capsules 1 g compared to a placebo and Corbrin Capsules in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Over a 26-week period, patients received the active treatment or placebo three times daily, in a 1:1 ratio. This clinical study uses a randomized method, with a cycle of every 4 patients. TCM doctors at or above the deputy director level of the research center conduct TCM dialectics on IPF patients. To assess efficacy, over the duration of the trial, we measured serial changes in a composite indicator encompassing time to first acute exacerbation of IPF (first hospitalization or death due to respiratory cause), total lung capacity (TLC) (mL), predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%), forced vital capacity (FVC) (mL), predicted diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (predicted DLco%), 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score, and arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) from baseline to week 26 versus placebo. A total of 103 patients were screened, and 72 received the study medication. Of these, 68 patients were included in the analysis set, with 34 receiving JBOL and 34 receiving a placebo. After 26 weeks, a statistically significant reduction in total lung capacity (TLC) was observed for the JBOL group, with a change of 136 mL compared to -523 mL for the placebo group (difference 659 mL, 95% CI -1215 to -104 mL, p = 0.02). The study found that the change in FVC% predicted was - 1.48% and - 3.58% for the JBOL and placebo groups, respectively (difference of 2.10%, 95% CI -7.13 to 2.93, p = 0.41). Additionally the differences between the two groups in changes in FVC (mL), DLCO % predicted, PaO2 (mmHg) measures were - 67 mL (95% CI -238 to 104), -7.74% (95% CI -17.26 to 1.79), and - 3.57 mmHg (95% CI -10.02 to 2.87), respectively. Treatment with JBOL compared to placebo resulted in sequential changes in acute exacerbation, with no significant difference in SGRQ scores. It was not found that there was a statistically significant difference between the JBOL and placebo groups in TEAE reporting and serious TEAE reporting. Compared to the placebo group, there was a statistically significant reduction (p < 0.021) in TLC (mL) after 26 weeks for JBOL. The rates of FVC % predicted, FVC, DLCO % predicted, and PaO2 in the group treatment with JBOL were numerically lower than those in the placebo treatment group, although these differences did not reach statistical significance. JBOL exhibited comparable safety to placebo. This study has preliminarily shown the efficacy and safety of JBOL for IPF, but this is an exploratory clinical trial, more patient-involved studies should be needed in the near future.Trial registration: Chictr.org.cn ChiCTR2000035351; the trial was prospective clinical studies registered on August 9, 2020.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.