Sanae Terada, Toshihiro Habara, Ryo Terada, Toshiharu Mitsuhashi, Ryuhei So, Nanako Yoshioka, Yumi Masumoto, Yukiko Kosaka, Rei Hirata, Nobuyoshi Hayashi
{"title":"日本7378例冷冻解冻和新鲜胚胎移植后单胎新生儿畸形和产科并发症的风险:使用双稳健估计的分析。","authors":"Sanae Terada, Toshihiro Habara, Ryo Terada, Toshiharu Mitsuhashi, Ryuhei So, Nanako Yoshioka, Yumi Masumoto, Yukiko Kosaka, Rei Hirata, Nobuyoshi Hayashi","doi":"10.1002/rmb2.12623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare risks of neonatal anomalies and obstetric complications among frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET), fresh embryo transfer (FreshET), and non-assisted reproductive technology (non-ART) treatments in infertile women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed 7378 singleton births (2643 non-ART, 4219 FET, 516 FreshET) from 2013 to 2022. Outcomes were compared using inverse probability weighting regression adjustment, with adjustment for maternal factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After adjustment, the risk of neonatal anomalies did not differ significantly between FET and non-ART, or FreshET and non-ART. FET was associated with increased risks of obstetric complications compared with non-ART, including placenta accreta (adjusted risk difference [ARD] 3.61%, 95% CI 2.95-4.28), placenta previa (ARD 0.55%, 95% CI 0.14-0.96), postpartum hemorrhage (ARD 7.08%, 95% CI 6.03-8.13), gestational hypertension (ARD 3.57%, 95% CI 2.47-4.68), gestational diabetes (ARD 0.96%, 95% CI 0.17-1.75), and preterm birth (ARD 2.13%, 95% CI 1.23-3.02). FET also showed higher risk of high birth weight (ARD 0.97%, 95% CI 0.42-1.52). FreshET showed no significant differences in obstetric complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the risk of neonatal anomalies did not differ among treatments, FET was associated with increased obstetric complication risks. These findings underscore the need for careful management of FET pregnancies and further research to improve treatment protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":21116,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Medicine and Biology","volume":"24 1","pages":"e12623"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755112/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risks of neonatal anomalies and obstetric complications in 7378 singleton births after frozen-thawed and fresh embryo transfers in Japan: An analysis using doubly robust estimation.\",\"authors\":\"Sanae Terada, Toshihiro Habara, Ryo Terada, Toshiharu Mitsuhashi, Ryuhei So, Nanako Yoshioka, Yumi Masumoto, Yukiko Kosaka, Rei Hirata, Nobuyoshi Hayashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/rmb2.12623\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare risks of neonatal anomalies and obstetric complications among frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET), fresh embryo transfer (FreshET), and non-assisted reproductive technology (non-ART) treatments in infertile women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed 7378 singleton births (2643 non-ART, 4219 FET, 516 FreshET) from 2013 to 2022. Outcomes were compared using inverse probability weighting regression adjustment, with adjustment for maternal factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After adjustment, the risk of neonatal anomalies did not differ significantly between FET and non-ART, or FreshET and non-ART. FET was associated with increased risks of obstetric complications compared with non-ART, including placenta accreta (adjusted risk difference [ARD] 3.61%, 95% CI 2.95-4.28), placenta previa (ARD 0.55%, 95% CI 0.14-0.96), postpartum hemorrhage (ARD 7.08%, 95% CI 6.03-8.13), gestational hypertension (ARD 3.57%, 95% CI 2.47-4.68), gestational diabetes (ARD 0.96%, 95% CI 0.17-1.75), and preterm birth (ARD 2.13%, 95% CI 1.23-3.02). FET also showed higher risk of high birth weight (ARD 0.97%, 95% CI 0.42-1.52). FreshET showed no significant differences in obstetric complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the risk of neonatal anomalies did not differ among treatments, FET was associated with increased obstetric complication risks. These findings underscore the need for careful management of FET pregnancies and further research to improve treatment protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive Medicine and Biology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"e12623\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755112/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive Medicine and Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12623\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12623","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:比较冷冻解冻胚胎移植(FET)、新鲜胚胎移植(FreshET)和非辅助生殖技术(non-ART)治疗不孕妇女新生儿畸形和产科并发症的风险。方法:本回顾性队列研究分析了2013年至2022年7378例单胎分娩(2643例非art, 4219例FET, 516例FreshET)。采用逆概率加权回归校正对结果进行比较,并对产妇因素进行校正。结果:调整后,FET与非art、FreshET与非art之间的新生儿异常风险无显著差异。与非art相比,FET与产科并发症的风险增加相关,包括胎盘增生(校正风险差[ARD] 3.61%, 95% CI 2.95-4.28)、前置胎盘(ARD 0.55%, 95% CI 0.14-0.96)、产后出血(ARD 7.08%, 95% CI 6.03-8.13)、妊娠高血压(ARD 3.57%, 95% CI 2.47-4.68)、妊娠糖尿病(ARD 0.96%, 95% CI 0.17-1.75)和早产(ARD 2.13%, 95% CI 1.23-3.02)。FET还显示高出生体重的风险较高(ARD 0.97%, 95% CI 0.42-1.52)。FreshET在产科并发症方面无显著差异。结论:虽然新生儿畸形的风险在不同的治疗中没有差异,但FET与产科并发症风险增加有关。这些发现强调了对FET妊娠进行谨慎管理和进一步研究以改进治疗方案的必要性。
Risks of neonatal anomalies and obstetric complications in 7378 singleton births after frozen-thawed and fresh embryo transfers in Japan: An analysis using doubly robust estimation.
Purpose: To compare risks of neonatal anomalies and obstetric complications among frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET), fresh embryo transfer (FreshET), and non-assisted reproductive technology (non-ART) treatments in infertile women.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 7378 singleton births (2643 non-ART, 4219 FET, 516 FreshET) from 2013 to 2022. Outcomes were compared using inverse probability weighting regression adjustment, with adjustment for maternal factors.
Results: After adjustment, the risk of neonatal anomalies did not differ significantly between FET and non-ART, or FreshET and non-ART. FET was associated with increased risks of obstetric complications compared with non-ART, including placenta accreta (adjusted risk difference [ARD] 3.61%, 95% CI 2.95-4.28), placenta previa (ARD 0.55%, 95% CI 0.14-0.96), postpartum hemorrhage (ARD 7.08%, 95% CI 6.03-8.13), gestational hypertension (ARD 3.57%, 95% CI 2.47-4.68), gestational diabetes (ARD 0.96%, 95% CI 0.17-1.75), and preterm birth (ARD 2.13%, 95% CI 1.23-3.02). FET also showed higher risk of high birth weight (ARD 0.97%, 95% CI 0.42-1.52). FreshET showed no significant differences in obstetric complications.
Conclusions: While the risk of neonatal anomalies did not differ among treatments, FET was associated with increased obstetric complication risks. These findings underscore the need for careful management of FET pregnancies and further research to improve treatment protocols.
期刊介绍:
Reproductive Medicine and Biology (RMB) is the official English journal of the Japan Society for Reproductive Medicine, the Japan Society of Fertilization and Implantation, the Japan Society of Andrology, and publishes original research articles that report new findings or concepts in all aspects of reproductive phenomena in all kinds of mammals. Papers in any of the following fields will be considered: andrology, endocrinology, oncology, immunology, genetics, function of gonads and genital tracts, erectile dysfunction, gametogenesis, function of accessory sex organs, fertilization, embryogenesis, embryo manipulation, pregnancy, implantation, ontogenesis, infectious disease, contraception, etc.