Hanna H Gebregzi, Joanna S Zeiger, Jeffrey P Smith, Libby Stuyt, Luann Cullen, Jim Carsella, Daniel C Rogers, Jordan Lafebre, Jennah Knalfec, Alfredo Vargas, Moussa M Diawara
{"title":"口服大麻二酚不会损害健康成人的学习和记忆。","authors":"Hanna H Gebregzi, Joanna S Zeiger, Jeffrey P Smith, Libby Stuyt, Luann Cullen, Jim Carsella, Daniel C Rogers, Jordan Lafebre, Jennah Knalfec, Alfredo Vargas, Moussa M Diawara","doi":"10.1186/s42238-025-00262-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effect of oral Cannabidiol (CBD) on interference during learning and memory (L&M) in healthy human volunteers has not been studied.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A two-arm crossover, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at Colorado State University Pueblo (CSU Pueblo) to evaluate the effects of 246 mg oral CBD on L&M in healthy adults. Among 57 healthy volunteers enrolled, 35 were included in the analyses. For assessment of L&M, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) was used to evaluate verbal baseline cognitive function; RAVLT-R tests (List A and List B recalls, Proactive and Retroactive Interference ratios, and Forgetting Speed ratio) were used to evaluate verbal declarative memory; and total prose recall was used to evaluate verbal logical memory. Linear Mixed Models with Bonferroni Corrections were used to compare L&M results between primary outcomes (CBD vs. placebo) and secondary demographic outcomes, with a two-tailed statistical significance of P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CBD administration did not affect any of the dependent variables measured compared to the placebo group. There were no effects of THC, history of CBD use, or sex on CBD's modulation of L&M. However, a highly significant interaction effect between treatment groups (CBD vs. placebo) and age of subjects was observed for the PI ratio (P = 0.008; n = 35).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study suggest that administration of oral CBD alone does not significantly impair L&M in healthy adults. However, age might influence CBD related modulation of proactive interference during human L&M. Future research involving a larger group of older adults is needed to confirm this potential effect.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was approved by the CSU Pueblo IRB, conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06074172).</p>","PeriodicalId":101310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cannabis research","volume":"7 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11756171/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oral cannabidiol did not impair learning and memory in healthy adults.\",\"authors\":\"Hanna H Gebregzi, Joanna S Zeiger, Jeffrey P Smith, Libby Stuyt, Luann Cullen, Jim Carsella, Daniel C Rogers, Jordan Lafebre, Jennah Knalfec, Alfredo Vargas, Moussa M Diawara\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42238-025-00262-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effect of oral Cannabidiol (CBD) on interference during learning and memory (L&M) in healthy human volunteers has not been studied.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A two-arm crossover, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at Colorado State University Pueblo (CSU Pueblo) to evaluate the effects of 246 mg oral CBD on L&M in healthy adults. Among 57 healthy volunteers enrolled, 35 were included in the analyses. For assessment of L&M, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) was used to evaluate verbal baseline cognitive function; RAVLT-R tests (List A and List B recalls, Proactive and Retroactive Interference ratios, and Forgetting Speed ratio) were used to evaluate verbal declarative memory; and total prose recall was used to evaluate verbal logical memory. Linear Mixed Models with Bonferroni Corrections were used to compare L&M results between primary outcomes (CBD vs. placebo) and secondary demographic outcomes, with a two-tailed statistical significance of P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CBD administration did not affect any of the dependent variables measured compared to the placebo group. There were no effects of THC, history of CBD use, or sex on CBD's modulation of L&M. However, a highly significant interaction effect between treatment groups (CBD vs. placebo) and age of subjects was observed for the PI ratio (P = 0.008; n = 35).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study suggest that administration of oral CBD alone does not significantly impair L&M in healthy adults. However, age might influence CBD related modulation of proactive interference during human L&M. Future research involving a larger group of older adults is needed to confirm this potential effect.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was approved by the CSU Pueblo IRB, conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06074172).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cannabis research\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11756171/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cannabis research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-025-00262-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cannabis research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-025-00262-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:口服大麻二酚(CBD)对健康人类志愿者学习记忆干扰(L&M)的影响尚未研究。方法:在科罗拉多州立大学普韦布洛分校(CSU Pueblo)进行了一项双臂交叉、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,以评估246 mg口服CBD对健康成人L&M的影响。在57名健康志愿者中,有35人被纳入分析。L&M的评估采用蒙特利尔认知评估法(MOCA)评估语言基线认知功能;采用RAVLT-R测试(表A和表B回忆、前向和后向干扰比、遗忘速比)评价言语陈述性记忆;总的散文回忆被用来评估口头逻辑记忆。使用Bonferroni校正的线性混合模型比较主要结果(CBD与安慰剂)和次要人口统计学结果之间的L&M结果,具有P的双尾统计学显著性。结果:与安慰剂组相比,CBD给药对测量的任何依赖变量都没有影响。四氢大麻酚、CBD使用史或性别对CBD对L&M的调节没有影响。然而,治疗组(CBD vs安慰剂)与受试者年龄之间的PI比存在高度显著的相互作用(P = 0.008;n = 35)。结论:本研究结果表明,单独口服CBD不会显著损害健康成人的L&M。然而,年龄可能会影响人类L&M过程中CBD相关的主动干扰调制。未来的研究需要涉及更大的老年人群体来证实这种潜在的影响。试验注册:该研究由CSU Pueblo IRB批准,根据赫尔辛基宣言进行,并在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT06074172)。
Oral cannabidiol did not impair learning and memory in healthy adults.
Background: The effect of oral Cannabidiol (CBD) on interference during learning and memory (L&M) in healthy human volunteers has not been studied.
Method: A two-arm crossover, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at Colorado State University Pueblo (CSU Pueblo) to evaluate the effects of 246 mg oral CBD on L&M in healthy adults. Among 57 healthy volunteers enrolled, 35 were included in the analyses. For assessment of L&M, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) was used to evaluate verbal baseline cognitive function; RAVLT-R tests (List A and List B recalls, Proactive and Retroactive Interference ratios, and Forgetting Speed ratio) were used to evaluate verbal declarative memory; and total prose recall was used to evaluate verbal logical memory. Linear Mixed Models with Bonferroni Corrections were used to compare L&M results between primary outcomes (CBD vs. placebo) and secondary demographic outcomes, with a two-tailed statistical significance of P < 0.05.
Results: CBD administration did not affect any of the dependent variables measured compared to the placebo group. There were no effects of THC, history of CBD use, or sex on CBD's modulation of L&M. However, a highly significant interaction effect between treatment groups (CBD vs. placebo) and age of subjects was observed for the PI ratio (P = 0.008; n = 35).
Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that administration of oral CBD alone does not significantly impair L&M in healthy adults. However, age might influence CBD related modulation of proactive interference during human L&M. Future research involving a larger group of older adults is needed to confirm this potential effect.
Trial registration: The study was approved by the CSU Pueblo IRB, conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06074172).