急诊盆腔和妊娠早期美国的经验教训:关注认知偏差。

IF 5.2 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Radiographics Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1148/rg.240101
Melissa F Tannenbaum, Karen S Lee, Se-Young Yoon, Robin B Levenson
{"title":"急诊盆腔和妊娠早期美国的经验教训:关注认知偏差。","authors":"Melissa F Tannenbaum, Karen S Lee, Se-Young Yoon, Robin B Levenson","doi":"10.1148/rg.240101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nonpregnant and pregnant women who present with acute pelvic pain can pose a diagnostic challenge in the emergency setting. The clinical presentation is often nonspecific, and the differential diagnosis may be very broad. These symptoms are often indications for pelvic US, which is the primary imaging modality when an obstetric or gynecologic cause is suspected. Interpretation of pelvic US may be challenging and a source of confusion and misinterpretation for radiologists. Additionally, cognitive biases in imaging interpretation can contribute to diagnostic errors. Cognitive biases represent systematic errors due to failure of the mental shortcuts that the brain subconsciously uses to produce quicker judgments. There are multiple different types of cognitive biases, all of which may lead to perceptual and interpretive errors. Familiarity with common and uncommon pelvic US findings in the setting of pelvic pain is imperative to assist with prompt and accurate diagnosis. Awareness of potential biases when interpreting pelvic US findings further helps hone the interpretation. The authors illustrate the imaging findings in several peer learning cases of nonpregnant and first-trimester pregnant patients who presented with acute pelvic pain in the emergency setting. Several nonobstetric and nongynecologic causes of acute pelvic pain are included for which pelvic US was the first imaging modality used in diagnosis. Diagnostic errors and cognitive biases in interpretation related to these cases are highlighted. The radiologist's awareness of potential cognitive biases in image interpretation may help to refine the differential diagnosis and mitigate errors. <sup>©</sup>RSNA, 2025 Supplemental material is available for this article.</p>","PeriodicalId":54512,"journal":{"name":"Radiographics","volume":"45 2","pages":"e240101"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lessons Learned in Emergency Pelvic and First-Trimester US: Focus on Cognitive Biases.\",\"authors\":\"Melissa F Tannenbaum, Karen S Lee, Se-Young Yoon, Robin B Levenson\",\"doi\":\"10.1148/rg.240101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Nonpregnant and pregnant women who present with acute pelvic pain can pose a diagnostic challenge in the emergency setting. The clinical presentation is often nonspecific, and the differential diagnosis may be very broad. These symptoms are often indications for pelvic US, which is the primary imaging modality when an obstetric or gynecologic cause is suspected. Interpretation of pelvic US may be challenging and a source of confusion and misinterpretation for radiologists. Additionally, cognitive biases in imaging interpretation can contribute to diagnostic errors. Cognitive biases represent systematic errors due to failure of the mental shortcuts that the brain subconsciously uses to produce quicker judgments. There are multiple different types of cognitive biases, all of which may lead to perceptual and interpretive errors. Familiarity with common and uncommon pelvic US findings in the setting of pelvic pain is imperative to assist with prompt and accurate diagnosis. Awareness of potential biases when interpreting pelvic US findings further helps hone the interpretation. The authors illustrate the imaging findings in several peer learning cases of nonpregnant and first-trimester pregnant patients who presented with acute pelvic pain in the emergency setting. Several nonobstetric and nongynecologic causes of acute pelvic pain are included for which pelvic US was the first imaging modality used in diagnosis. Diagnostic errors and cognitive biases in interpretation related to these cases are highlighted. The radiologist's awareness of potential cognitive biases in image interpretation may help to refine the differential diagnosis and mitigate errors. <sup>©</sup>RSNA, 2025 Supplemental material is available for this article.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiographics\",\"volume\":\"45 2\",\"pages\":\"e240101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiographics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.240101\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiographics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.240101","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

急性盆腔疼痛的非孕妇和孕妇在紧急情况下可能会给诊断带来挑战。临床表现通常是非特异性的,鉴别诊断可能非常广泛。这些症状通常是盆腔超声的指征,当怀疑是产科或妇科原因时,盆腔超声是主要的影像学检查方式。对于放射科医生来说,骨盆US的解释可能是具有挑战性的,也是混淆和误解的来源。此外,影像学解释中的认知偏差可能导致诊断错误。认知偏差是由于大脑潜意识中用来快速做出判断的思维捷径失效而导致的系统性错误。有多种不同类型的认知偏差,所有这些都可能导致感知和解释错误。熟悉盆腔疼痛的常见和不常见的盆腔超声检查结果是必要的,有助于及时准确的诊断。在解释盆腔超声检查结果时,意识到潜在的偏见有助于进一步完善解释。作者举例说明了几个同行学习病例的影像学发现,这些病例是在急诊情况下出现急性盆腔疼痛的未怀孕和孕早期孕妇。几种非产科和非妇科原因的急性盆腔疼痛包括盆腔超声是第一成像模式用于诊断。诊断错误和认知偏差在解释相关的这些情况下强调。放射科医生对图像解释中潜在认知偏差的认识可能有助于改进鉴别诊断并减少错误。©RSNA, 2025本文可获得补充材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lessons Learned in Emergency Pelvic and First-Trimester US: Focus on Cognitive Biases.

Nonpregnant and pregnant women who present with acute pelvic pain can pose a diagnostic challenge in the emergency setting. The clinical presentation is often nonspecific, and the differential diagnosis may be very broad. These symptoms are often indications for pelvic US, which is the primary imaging modality when an obstetric or gynecologic cause is suspected. Interpretation of pelvic US may be challenging and a source of confusion and misinterpretation for radiologists. Additionally, cognitive biases in imaging interpretation can contribute to diagnostic errors. Cognitive biases represent systematic errors due to failure of the mental shortcuts that the brain subconsciously uses to produce quicker judgments. There are multiple different types of cognitive biases, all of which may lead to perceptual and interpretive errors. Familiarity with common and uncommon pelvic US findings in the setting of pelvic pain is imperative to assist with prompt and accurate diagnosis. Awareness of potential biases when interpreting pelvic US findings further helps hone the interpretation. The authors illustrate the imaging findings in several peer learning cases of nonpregnant and first-trimester pregnant patients who presented with acute pelvic pain in the emergency setting. Several nonobstetric and nongynecologic causes of acute pelvic pain are included for which pelvic US was the first imaging modality used in diagnosis. Diagnostic errors and cognitive biases in interpretation related to these cases are highlighted. The radiologist's awareness of potential cognitive biases in image interpretation may help to refine the differential diagnosis and mitigate errors. ©RSNA, 2025 Supplemental material is available for this article.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiographics
Radiographics 医学-核医学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
5.50%
发文量
224
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Launched by the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in 1981, RadioGraphics is one of the premier education journals in diagnostic radiology. Each bimonthly issue features 15–20 practice-focused articles spanning the full spectrum of radiologic subspecialties and addressing topics such as diagnostic imaging techniques, imaging features of a disease or group of diseases, radiologic-pathologic correlation, practice policy and quality initiatives, imaging physics, informatics, and lifelong learning. A special issue, a monograph focused on a single subspecialty or on a crossover topic of interest to multiple subspecialties, is published each October. Each issue offers more than a dozen opportunities to earn continuing medical education credits that qualify for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM and all online activities can be applied toward the ABR MOC Self-Assessment Requirement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信