全麻下儿童拔牙术后疼痛的药理学处理:系统综述。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Pain Research & Management Pub Date : 2025-01-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/prm/8569846
Emily Xin Yi Ting, Sneha Sethi, Emilija Jensen, Brianna Poirier
{"title":"全麻下儿童拔牙术后疼痛的药理学处理:系统综述。","authors":"Emily Xin Yi Ting, Sneha Sethi, Emilija Jensen, Brianna Poirier","doi":"10.1155/prm/8569846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>General anaesthesia (GA) as a pharmacological behaviour management strategy may be indicated for dental extractions in children unable to cooperate in the dental chair. Pain is the most common postoperative complication in children following dental GA. There is conflicting evidence available on the efficacy of local anaesthetic (LA) agents for postoperative pain management following dental extraction. Therefore, this review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of different pharmacological analgesic techniques on postoperative pain following dental extractions under GA in children. A search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus and CINAHL was conducted on 17/10/2023 to identify studies eligible for inclusion in this review. Two independent reviewers performed search screening, data extraction and critical appraisal. Results were narratively described due to heterogeneity of pain assessment tools and management strategies. The search yielded 8742 results, of which 15 studies were included. Methods of pain assessment varied greatly across included studies, with 14 different pain scales used across the 15 studies. Included studies suggest preoperative oral paracetamol and oral ibuprofen as well as postoperative topical bupivacaine lowered pain scores. This review underscores the challenges in reliably assessing pain in children and highlights the necessity for age-specific validated pain assessment tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2025 ","pages":"8569846"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11753856/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacological Postoperative Pain Management for Paediatric Dental Extractions Under General Anaesthesia: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Emily Xin Yi Ting, Sneha Sethi, Emilija Jensen, Brianna Poirier\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/prm/8569846\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>General anaesthesia (GA) as a pharmacological behaviour management strategy may be indicated for dental extractions in children unable to cooperate in the dental chair. Pain is the most common postoperative complication in children following dental GA. There is conflicting evidence available on the efficacy of local anaesthetic (LA) agents for postoperative pain management following dental extraction. Therefore, this review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of different pharmacological analgesic techniques on postoperative pain following dental extractions under GA in children. A search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus and CINAHL was conducted on 17/10/2023 to identify studies eligible for inclusion in this review. Two independent reviewers performed search screening, data extraction and critical appraisal. Results were narratively described due to heterogeneity of pain assessment tools and management strategies. The search yielded 8742 results, of which 15 studies were included. Methods of pain assessment varied greatly across included studies, with 14 different pain scales used across the 15 studies. Included studies suggest preoperative oral paracetamol and oral ibuprofen as well as postoperative topical bupivacaine lowered pain scores. This review underscores the challenges in reliably assessing pain in children and highlights the necessity for age-specific validated pain assessment tools.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Research & Management\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"8569846\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11753856/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Research & Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/prm/8569846\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/prm/8569846","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全身麻醉(GA)作为一种药理学行为管理策略可能适用于拔牙儿童无法在牙科椅上合作。疼痛是儿童牙科GA术后最常见的并发症。关于局部麻醉(LA)药物对拔牙术后疼痛管理的有效性,存在相互矛盾的证据。因此,本综述旨在评价不同药物镇痛技术对儿童GA下拔牙术后疼痛的疗效。检索PubMed、Embase、Scopus和CINAHL于2023年10月17日进行,以确定有资格纳入本综述的研究。两名独立审稿人进行了搜索筛选、数据提取和批判性评估。由于疼痛评估工具和管理策略的异质性,结果被叙述描述。这项搜索产生了8742项结果,其中包括15项研究。在纳入的研究中,疼痛评估方法差异很大,在15项研究中使用了14种不同的疼痛量表。纳入的研究表明术前口服扑热息痛和口服布洛芬以及术后局部布比卡因可降低疼痛评分。本综述强调了可靠评估儿童疼痛的挑战,并强调了针对特定年龄的有效疼痛评估工具的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pharmacological Postoperative Pain Management for Paediatric Dental Extractions Under General Anaesthesia: A Systematic Review.

General anaesthesia (GA) as a pharmacological behaviour management strategy may be indicated for dental extractions in children unable to cooperate in the dental chair. Pain is the most common postoperative complication in children following dental GA. There is conflicting evidence available on the efficacy of local anaesthetic (LA) agents for postoperative pain management following dental extraction. Therefore, this review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of different pharmacological analgesic techniques on postoperative pain following dental extractions under GA in children. A search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus and CINAHL was conducted on 17/10/2023 to identify studies eligible for inclusion in this review. Two independent reviewers performed search screening, data extraction and critical appraisal. Results were narratively described due to heterogeneity of pain assessment tools and management strategies. The search yielded 8742 results, of which 15 studies were included. Methods of pain assessment varied greatly across included studies, with 14 different pain scales used across the 15 studies. Included studies suggest preoperative oral paracetamol and oral ibuprofen as well as postoperative topical bupivacaine lowered pain scores. This review underscores the challenges in reliably assessing pain in children and highlights the necessity for age-specific validated pain assessment tools.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Research & Management
Pain Research & Management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Research and Management is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of pain management. The most recent Impact Factor for Pain Research and Management is 1.685 according to the 2015 Journal Citation Reports released by Thomson Reuters in 2016.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信