加多匹诺可减少钆剂量,同时保持肺部MRA的肺动脉增强质量:提高安全性和可持续性的机会。

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Julius F Heidenreich, Sheena Y Chu, Jan-Peter Grunz, Jitka Starekova, Prashant Nagpal, Scott B Reeder, Thomas M Grist
{"title":"加多匹诺可减少钆剂量,同时保持肺部MRA的肺动脉增强质量:提高安全性和可持续性的机会。","authors":"Julius F Heidenreich, Sheena Y Chu, Jan-Peter Grunz, Jitka Starekova, Prashant Nagpal, Scott B Reeder, Thomas M Grist","doi":"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>Pulmonary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is an imaging method with proven utility for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism and avoids the need for ionizing radiation and iodinated contrast agents. High-relaxivity gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs), such as gadopiclenol, can be used to reduce the required gadolinium dose for pulmonary MRA. The aim of this study was to compare the contrast enhancement performance of gadopiclenol with an established gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced pulmonary MRA protocol.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective single-center study, data from 152 patients who underwent pulmonary MRA at 1.5 T were analyzed. Imaging was performed with either 0.05 mmol/kg gadopiclenol (n = 75) or 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine (n = 77), using dedicated multiphasic imaging protocols with precontrast, pulmonary arterial phase, immediate delayed phase, and a low flip-angle T1-weighted spoiled gradient echo acquisition. Subjective image quality evaluation was performed blinded by 2 radiologists on a 5-point Likert scale. For the estimation of interrater reliability, Cohen weighted κ was calculated. For semiquantitative assessment, signal intensities were measured in the pulmonary arteries, and relative signal enhancement was calculated. Data from groups were compared with Mann-Whitney U tests using Bonferroni corrections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Signal enhancement relative to precontrast in the first-pass pulmonary arterial phase was higher with 0.05 mmol/kg gadopiclenol compared with 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine (20.0-fold ± 5.6-fold vs 17.8-fold ± 5.8-fold; P = 0.015). Readers observed no difference in subjective rating in terms of intravascular contrast, peripheral vessel depiction, and diagnostic confidence with substantial interrater reliability (Cohen κ = 0.73 [95% confidence interval: 0.57-0.89], 0.65 [0.55-0.75], and 0.74 [0.65-0.84], all P's < 0.001). No severe adverse events were recorded for any clinical MRA examination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The high-relaxivity contrast agent gadopiclenol can facilitate a reduction in gadolinium dose by 50% without compromising contrast enhancement for pulmonary MRA. This approach may enhance the safety and sustainability of pulmonary MRA in the long term.</p>","PeriodicalId":14486,"journal":{"name":"Investigative Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gadopiclenol Enables Reduced Gadolinium Dose While Maintaining Quality of Pulmonary Arterial Enhancement for Pulmonary MRA: An Opportunity for Improved Safety and Sustainability.\",\"authors\":\"Julius F Heidenreich, Sheena Y Chu, Jan-Peter Grunz, Jitka Starekova, Prashant Nagpal, Scott B Reeder, Thomas M Grist\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>Pulmonary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is an imaging method with proven utility for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism and avoids the need for ionizing radiation and iodinated contrast agents. High-relaxivity gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs), such as gadopiclenol, can be used to reduce the required gadolinium dose for pulmonary MRA. The aim of this study was to compare the contrast enhancement performance of gadopiclenol with an established gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced pulmonary MRA protocol.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective single-center study, data from 152 patients who underwent pulmonary MRA at 1.5 T were analyzed. Imaging was performed with either 0.05 mmol/kg gadopiclenol (n = 75) or 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine (n = 77), using dedicated multiphasic imaging protocols with precontrast, pulmonary arterial phase, immediate delayed phase, and a low flip-angle T1-weighted spoiled gradient echo acquisition. Subjective image quality evaluation was performed blinded by 2 radiologists on a 5-point Likert scale. For the estimation of interrater reliability, Cohen weighted κ was calculated. For semiquantitative assessment, signal intensities were measured in the pulmonary arteries, and relative signal enhancement was calculated. Data from groups were compared with Mann-Whitney U tests using Bonferroni corrections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Signal enhancement relative to precontrast in the first-pass pulmonary arterial phase was higher with 0.05 mmol/kg gadopiclenol compared with 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine (20.0-fold ± 5.6-fold vs 17.8-fold ± 5.8-fold; P = 0.015). Readers observed no difference in subjective rating in terms of intravascular contrast, peripheral vessel depiction, and diagnostic confidence with substantial interrater reliability (Cohen κ = 0.73 [95% confidence interval: 0.57-0.89], 0.65 [0.55-0.75], and 0.74 [0.65-0.84], all P's < 0.001). No severe adverse events were recorded for any clinical MRA examination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The high-relaxivity contrast agent gadopiclenol can facilitate a reduction in gadolinium dose by 50% without compromising contrast enhancement for pulmonary MRA. This approach may enhance the safety and sustainability of pulmonary MRA in the long term.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investigative Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investigative Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001154\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001154","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

原理和目的:肺磁共振血管造影(MRA)是一种被证实用于排除肺栓塞的成像方法,避免了对电离辐射和碘造影剂的需要。高弛豫钆基造影剂(gbca),如加多苯二酚,可用于减少肺部MRA所需的钆剂量。本研究的目的是比较加多苯二醇与已建立的加多苯二胺增强肺部MRA方案的对比增强性能。材料和方法:在这项回顾性单中心研究中,分析了152例在1.5 T时进行肺部MRA的患者的数据。影像学采用0.05 mmol/kg加多苯二醇(n = 75)或0.1 mmol/kg加多苯二胺(n = 77),采用专用多相成像方案,包括预造影术、肺动脉期、即时延迟期和低翻转角t1加权破坏梯度回波采集。主观图像质量评估由2名放射科医生在5分李克特量表上进行盲法。对于互译信度的估计,计算Cohen加权κ。在半定量评估中,测量肺动脉的信号强度,并计算相对信号增强。各组数据采用Bonferroni校正与Mann-Whitney U检验进行比较。结果:相对于造影前,0.05 mmol/kg加多苯二醇组与0.1 mmol/kg加多苯二胺组相比,首过肺动脉期的信号增强更高(20.0倍±5.6倍vs 17.8倍±5.8倍;P = 0.015)。读者在血管内对比、外周血管描绘和诊断可信度方面没有观察到主观评分的差异(Cohen κ = 0.73[95%置信区间:0.57-0.89]、0.65[0.55-0.75]和0.74 [0.65-0.84],P < 0.001)。临床MRA检查均无严重不良事件记录。结论:高弛豫造影剂加多比诺可以促进钆剂量减少50%而不影响肺部MRA的造影剂增强。从长远来看,该方法可提高肺部MRA的安全性和可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gadopiclenol Enables Reduced Gadolinium Dose While Maintaining Quality of Pulmonary Arterial Enhancement for Pulmonary MRA: An Opportunity for Improved Safety and Sustainability.

Rationale and objectives: Pulmonary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is an imaging method with proven utility for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism and avoids the need for ionizing radiation and iodinated contrast agents. High-relaxivity gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs), such as gadopiclenol, can be used to reduce the required gadolinium dose for pulmonary MRA. The aim of this study was to compare the contrast enhancement performance of gadopiclenol with an established gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced pulmonary MRA protocol.

Materials and methods: In this retrospective single-center study, data from 152 patients who underwent pulmonary MRA at 1.5 T were analyzed. Imaging was performed with either 0.05 mmol/kg gadopiclenol (n = 75) or 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine (n = 77), using dedicated multiphasic imaging protocols with precontrast, pulmonary arterial phase, immediate delayed phase, and a low flip-angle T1-weighted spoiled gradient echo acquisition. Subjective image quality evaluation was performed blinded by 2 radiologists on a 5-point Likert scale. For the estimation of interrater reliability, Cohen weighted κ was calculated. For semiquantitative assessment, signal intensities were measured in the pulmonary arteries, and relative signal enhancement was calculated. Data from groups were compared with Mann-Whitney U tests using Bonferroni corrections.

Results: Signal enhancement relative to precontrast in the first-pass pulmonary arterial phase was higher with 0.05 mmol/kg gadopiclenol compared with 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine (20.0-fold ± 5.6-fold vs 17.8-fold ± 5.8-fold; P = 0.015). Readers observed no difference in subjective rating in terms of intravascular contrast, peripheral vessel depiction, and diagnostic confidence with substantial interrater reliability (Cohen κ = 0.73 [95% confidence interval: 0.57-0.89], 0.65 [0.55-0.75], and 0.74 [0.65-0.84], all P's < 0.001). No severe adverse events were recorded for any clinical MRA examination.

Conclusions: The high-relaxivity contrast agent gadopiclenol can facilitate a reduction in gadolinium dose by 50% without compromising contrast enhancement for pulmonary MRA. This approach may enhance the safety and sustainability of pulmonary MRA in the long term.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Investigative Radiology
Investigative Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
16.40%
发文量
188
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Investigative Radiology publishes original, peer-reviewed reports on clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, and related modalities. Emphasis is on early and timely publication. Primarily research-oriented, the journal also includes a wide variety of features of interest to clinical radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信