99mtc -半乳糖人血清白蛋白SPECT/CT预测肝切除术后肝衰竭的定量评价。

IF 9.6 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Clinical Nuclear Medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1097/RLU.0000000000005648
Yukinori Okajima, Shin Yanagisawa, Akira Yamada, Tsuyoshi Notake, Akira Shimizu, Yuji Soejima, Yasunari Fujinaga
{"title":"99mtc -半乳糖人血清白蛋白SPECT/CT预测肝切除术后肝衰竭的定量评价。","authors":"Yukinori Okajima, Shin Yanagisawa, Akira Yamada, Tsuyoshi Notake, Akira Shimizu, Yuji Soejima, Yasunari Fujinaga","doi":"10.1097/RLU.0000000000005648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the predictive ability of 99m Tc-galactosyl human serum albumin SPECT/CT quantitative parameters for posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-eight patients who underwent 99m Tc-galactosyl human serum albumin scintigraphy as a preoperative examination for hepatectomy between July 2021 and December 2023 were prospectively evaluated. The patients were divided into PHLF and non-PHLF groups. The clearance index (HH15) and receptor index (LHL15) were calculated from planar images. Quantitative parameters for the total liver (SUV max , SUV mean , peak SUV [SUV peak ], functional liver volume [FLV], SUV mean  × FLV), remnant liver (r-SUV max , r-SUV mean , r-SUV peak , r-FLV, and r-SUV mean  × r-FLV), and r-FLV/FLV were calculated from SPECT/CT images. The areas under the curve (AUCs) of parameters from planar images and SPECT/CT parameters of the total and remnant livers were calculated to evaluate the predictive ability of PHLF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PHLF occurred in 9 patients. AUC of r-FLV was significantly higher than that of HH15 (0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-0.99 vs 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46-0.84; P  = 0.026) and LHL15 (0.93; 95% CI, 0.84-0.99 vs 0.72; 95% CI, 0.55-0.86; P  = 0.043). AUC of r-SUV mean  × r-FLV was significantly higher than that of HH15 (0.90; 95% CI, 0.80-0.97 vs 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46-0.84; P  = 0.037). There were no significant differences between the AUC of other SPECT/CT, r-FLV/FLV, and planar image parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>r-FLV can predict PHLF more accurately than HH15 or LHL15.</p>","PeriodicalId":10692,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nuclear Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"404-409"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative Evaluation of 99m Tc-Galactosyl Human Serum Albumin SPECT/CT for the Prediction of Posthepatectomy Liver Failure.\",\"authors\":\"Yukinori Okajima, Shin Yanagisawa, Akira Yamada, Tsuyoshi Notake, Akira Shimizu, Yuji Soejima, Yasunari Fujinaga\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RLU.0000000000005648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the predictive ability of 99m Tc-galactosyl human serum albumin SPECT/CT quantitative parameters for posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-eight patients who underwent 99m Tc-galactosyl human serum albumin scintigraphy as a preoperative examination for hepatectomy between July 2021 and December 2023 were prospectively evaluated. The patients were divided into PHLF and non-PHLF groups. The clearance index (HH15) and receptor index (LHL15) were calculated from planar images. Quantitative parameters for the total liver (SUV max , SUV mean , peak SUV [SUV peak ], functional liver volume [FLV], SUV mean  × FLV), remnant liver (r-SUV max , r-SUV mean , r-SUV peak , r-FLV, and r-SUV mean  × r-FLV), and r-FLV/FLV were calculated from SPECT/CT images. The areas under the curve (AUCs) of parameters from planar images and SPECT/CT parameters of the total and remnant livers were calculated to evaluate the predictive ability of PHLF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PHLF occurred in 9 patients. AUC of r-FLV was significantly higher than that of HH15 (0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-0.99 vs 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46-0.84; P  = 0.026) and LHL15 (0.93; 95% CI, 0.84-0.99 vs 0.72; 95% CI, 0.55-0.86; P  = 0.043). AUC of r-SUV mean  × r-FLV was significantly higher than that of HH15 (0.90; 95% CI, 0.80-0.97 vs 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46-0.84; P  = 0.037). There were no significant differences between the AUC of other SPECT/CT, r-FLV/FLV, and planar image parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>r-FLV can predict PHLF more accurately than HH15 or LHL15.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10692,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Nuclear Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"404-409\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Nuclear Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000005648\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nuclear Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000005648","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价99mtc -半乳糖人血清白蛋白SPECT/CT定量参数对肝切除后肝衰竭(PHLF)的预测能力。方法:对2021年7月至2023年12月期间接受99mtc -半乳糖人血清白蛋白显像作为肝切除术术前检查的68例患者进行前瞻性评估。患者分为PHLF组和非PHLF组。利用平面图像计算清除率指数(HH15)和受体指数(LHL15)。从SPECT/CT图像计算全肝(SUVmax、SUVmean、峰值SUV [SUVpeak]、功能肝体积[FLV]、SUVmean × FLV)、残肝(r-SUVmax、r-SUVmean、r-SUVpeak、r-FLV、r-SUVmean × r-FLV)、r-FLV/FLV的定量参数。计算全肝和残肝的平面图像参数和SPECT/CT参数的曲线下面积(auc),评价PHLF的预测能力。结果:9例患者发生PHLF。r-FLV的AUC显著高于HH15 (0.93;95%置信区间[CI], 0.84-0.99 vs 0.66;95% ci, 0.46-0.84;P = 0.026)和LHL15 (0.93;95% CI, 0.84-0.99 vs 0.72;95% ci, 0.55-0.86;P = 0.043)。r-SUVmean × r-FLV的AUC显著高于HH15 (0.90;95% CI, 0.80-0.97 vs 0.66;95% ci, 0.46-0.84;P = 0.037)。其他SPECT/CT的AUC、r-FLV/FLV及平面图像参数间无显著差异。结论:r-FLV预测PHLF的准确性高于HH15和LHL15。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantitative Evaluation of 99m Tc-Galactosyl Human Serum Albumin SPECT/CT for the Prediction of Posthepatectomy Liver Failure.

Purpose: To evaluate the predictive ability of 99m Tc-galactosyl human serum albumin SPECT/CT quantitative parameters for posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF).

Methods: Sixty-eight patients who underwent 99m Tc-galactosyl human serum albumin scintigraphy as a preoperative examination for hepatectomy between July 2021 and December 2023 were prospectively evaluated. The patients were divided into PHLF and non-PHLF groups. The clearance index (HH15) and receptor index (LHL15) were calculated from planar images. Quantitative parameters for the total liver (SUV max , SUV mean , peak SUV [SUV peak ], functional liver volume [FLV], SUV mean  × FLV), remnant liver (r-SUV max , r-SUV mean , r-SUV peak , r-FLV, and r-SUV mean  × r-FLV), and r-FLV/FLV were calculated from SPECT/CT images. The areas under the curve (AUCs) of parameters from planar images and SPECT/CT parameters of the total and remnant livers were calculated to evaluate the predictive ability of PHLF.

Results: PHLF occurred in 9 patients. AUC of r-FLV was significantly higher than that of HH15 (0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-0.99 vs 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46-0.84; P  = 0.026) and LHL15 (0.93; 95% CI, 0.84-0.99 vs 0.72; 95% CI, 0.55-0.86; P  = 0.043). AUC of r-SUV mean  × r-FLV was significantly higher than that of HH15 (0.90; 95% CI, 0.80-0.97 vs 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46-0.84; P  = 0.037). There were no significant differences between the AUC of other SPECT/CT, r-FLV/FLV, and planar image parameters.

Conclusions: r-FLV can predict PHLF more accurately than HH15 or LHL15.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Nuclear Medicine
Clinical Nuclear Medicine 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
31.10%
发文量
1113
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Nuclear Medicine is a comprehensive and current resource for professionals in the field of nuclear medicine. It caters to both generalists and specialists, offering valuable insights on how to effectively apply nuclear medicine techniques in various clinical scenarios. With a focus on timely dissemination of information, this journal covers the latest developments that impact all aspects of the specialty. Geared towards practitioners, Clinical Nuclear Medicine is the ultimate practice-oriented publication in the field of nuclear imaging. Its informative articles are complemented by numerous illustrations that demonstrate how physicians can seamlessly integrate the knowledge gained into their everyday practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信