在一个多中心、常规临床护理的国家年龄相关性黄斑变性数据库中,人工智能评估维持期体液波动对抗血管内皮生长因子视力结果的影响

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ruben Martin-Pinardel, Jordi Izquierdo-Serra, Carolina Bernal-Morales, Sandro De Zanet, Gonzaga Garay-Aramburu, Martin Puzo, Carolina Arruabarrena, Laura Sararols, Maximino Abraldes, Laura Broc, Jose Juan Escobar-Barranco, Marta Figueroa, Miguel Angel Zapata, José M Ruiz-Moreno, Alba Parrado-Carrillo, Aina Moll-Udina, Socorro Alforja, Marc Figueras-Roca, Laia Gómez-Baldó, Carlos Ciller, Stefanos Apostolopoulos, Anastasiia Mishchuk, Ricardo P Casaroli-Marano, Javier Zarranz-Ventura
{"title":"在一个多中心、常规临床护理的国家年龄相关性黄斑变性数据库中,人工智能评估维持期体液波动对抗血管内皮生长因子视力结果的影响","authors":"Ruben Martin-Pinardel, Jordi Izquierdo-Serra, Carolina Bernal-Morales, Sandro De Zanet, Gonzaga Garay-Aramburu, Martin Puzo, Carolina Arruabarrena, Laura Sararols, Maximino Abraldes, Laura Broc, Jose Juan Escobar-Barranco, Marta Figueroa, Miguel Angel Zapata, José M Ruiz-Moreno, Alba Parrado-Carrillo, Aina Moll-Udina, Socorro Alforja, Marc Figueras-Roca, Laia Gómez-Baldó, Carlos Ciller, Stefanos Apostolopoulos, Anastasiia Mishchuk, Ricardo P Casaroli-Marano, Javier Zarranz-Ventura","doi":"10.1136/bjo-2024-325615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim To evaluate the impact of fluid volume fluctuations quantified with artificial intelligence in optical coherence tomography scans during the maintenance phase and visual outcomes at 12 and 24 months in a real-world, multicentre, national cohort of treatment-naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) eyes. Methods Demographics, visual acuity (VA) and number of injections were collected using the Fight Retinal Blindness tool. Intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), pigment epithelial detachment (PED), total fluid (TF) and central subfield thickness (CST) were quantified using the RetinAI Discovery tool. Fluctuations were defined as the SD of within-eye quantified values, and eyes were distributed according to SD quartiles for each biomarker. Results A total of 452 naïve nAMD eyes were included. Eyes with highest (Q4) versus lowest (Q1) fluid fluctuations showed significantly worse VA change (months 3–12) in IRF −3.91 versus 3.50 letters, PED −4.66 versus 3.29, TF −2.07 versus 2.97 and CST −1.85 versus 2.96 (all p<0.05), but not for SRF 0.66 versus 0.93 (p=0.91). Similar VA outcomes were observed at month 24 for PED −8.41 versus 4.98 (p<0.05), TF −7.38 versus 1.89 (p=0.07) and CST −10.58 versus 3.60 (p<0.05). The median number of injections (months 3–24) was significantly higher in Q4 versus Q1 eyes in IRF 9 versus 8, SRF 10 versus 8 and TF 10 versus 8 (all p<0.05). Conclusion This multicentre study reports a negative effect in VA outcomes of fluid volume fluctuations during the maintenance phase in specific fluid compartments, suggesting that anatomical and functional treatment response patterns may be fluid-specific. Data are available in a public, open access repository. Zarranz-Ventura J. (n.d.). Data from: FRB Spain IMAGE nAMD Report 2. Dryad Digital Repository, March 30, 2024. (<https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.m905qfv8p>).","PeriodicalId":9313,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fluid fluctuations assessed with artificial intelligence during the maintenance phase impact anti-vascular endothelial growth factor visual outcomes in a multicentre, routine clinical care national age-related macular degeneration database\",\"authors\":\"Ruben Martin-Pinardel, Jordi Izquierdo-Serra, Carolina Bernal-Morales, Sandro De Zanet, Gonzaga Garay-Aramburu, Martin Puzo, Carolina Arruabarrena, Laura Sararols, Maximino Abraldes, Laura Broc, Jose Juan Escobar-Barranco, Marta Figueroa, Miguel Angel Zapata, José M Ruiz-Moreno, Alba Parrado-Carrillo, Aina Moll-Udina, Socorro Alforja, Marc Figueras-Roca, Laia Gómez-Baldó, Carlos Ciller, Stefanos Apostolopoulos, Anastasiia Mishchuk, Ricardo P Casaroli-Marano, Javier Zarranz-Ventura\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bjo-2024-325615\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim To evaluate the impact of fluid volume fluctuations quantified with artificial intelligence in optical coherence tomography scans during the maintenance phase and visual outcomes at 12 and 24 months in a real-world, multicentre, national cohort of treatment-naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) eyes. Methods Demographics, visual acuity (VA) and number of injections were collected using the Fight Retinal Blindness tool. Intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), pigment epithelial detachment (PED), total fluid (TF) and central subfield thickness (CST) were quantified using the RetinAI Discovery tool. Fluctuations were defined as the SD of within-eye quantified values, and eyes were distributed according to SD quartiles for each biomarker. Results A total of 452 naïve nAMD eyes were included. Eyes with highest (Q4) versus lowest (Q1) fluid fluctuations showed significantly worse VA change (months 3–12) in IRF −3.91 versus 3.50 letters, PED −4.66 versus 3.29, TF −2.07 versus 2.97 and CST −1.85 versus 2.96 (all p<0.05), but not for SRF 0.66 versus 0.93 (p=0.91). Similar VA outcomes were observed at month 24 for PED −8.41 versus 4.98 (p<0.05), TF −7.38 versus 1.89 (p=0.07) and CST −10.58 versus 3.60 (p<0.05). The median number of injections (months 3–24) was significantly higher in Q4 versus Q1 eyes in IRF 9 versus 8, SRF 10 versus 8 and TF 10 versus 8 (all p<0.05). Conclusion This multicentre study reports a negative effect in VA outcomes of fluid volume fluctuations during the maintenance phase in specific fluid compartments, suggesting that anatomical and functional treatment response patterns may be fluid-specific. Data are available in a public, open access repository. Zarranz-Ventura J. (n.d.). Data from: FRB Spain IMAGE nAMD Report 2. Dryad Digital Repository, March 30, 2024. (<https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.m905qfv8p>).\",\"PeriodicalId\":9313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2024-325615\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2024-325615","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在一个真实世界、多中心、国家队列treatment-naïve新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(nAMD)眼睛中,评估维持期光学相干断层扫描中人工智能量化的体液体积波动对12个月和24个月视力结果的影响。方法采用“抗视网膜失明”工具对患者进行人口统计学、视敏度(VA)和注射次数的统计。视网膜内液(IRF)、视网膜下液(SRF)、色素上皮脱离(PED)、总液(TF)和中心亚场厚度(CST)使用RetinAI Discovery工具进行量化。波动被定义为眼内量化值的标准差,并根据每个生物标志物的SD四分位数进行眼内分布。结果共纳入452只naïve nAMD眼。流体波动最高(Q4)与最低(Q1)的眼睛在IRF - 3.91比3.50字母,PED - 4.66比3.29,TF - 2.07比2.97,CST - 1.85比2.96的情况下,VA变化(3-12个月)明显更差(均p)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fluid fluctuations assessed with artificial intelligence during the maintenance phase impact anti-vascular endothelial growth factor visual outcomes in a multicentre, routine clinical care national age-related macular degeneration database
Aim To evaluate the impact of fluid volume fluctuations quantified with artificial intelligence in optical coherence tomography scans during the maintenance phase and visual outcomes at 12 and 24 months in a real-world, multicentre, national cohort of treatment-naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) eyes. Methods Demographics, visual acuity (VA) and number of injections were collected using the Fight Retinal Blindness tool. Intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), pigment epithelial detachment (PED), total fluid (TF) and central subfield thickness (CST) were quantified using the RetinAI Discovery tool. Fluctuations were defined as the SD of within-eye quantified values, and eyes were distributed according to SD quartiles for each biomarker. Results A total of 452 naïve nAMD eyes were included. Eyes with highest (Q4) versus lowest (Q1) fluid fluctuations showed significantly worse VA change (months 3–12) in IRF −3.91 versus 3.50 letters, PED −4.66 versus 3.29, TF −2.07 versus 2.97 and CST −1.85 versus 2.96 (all p<0.05), but not for SRF 0.66 versus 0.93 (p=0.91). Similar VA outcomes were observed at month 24 for PED −8.41 versus 4.98 (p<0.05), TF −7.38 versus 1.89 (p=0.07) and CST −10.58 versus 3.60 (p<0.05). The median number of injections (months 3–24) was significantly higher in Q4 versus Q1 eyes in IRF 9 versus 8, SRF 10 versus 8 and TF 10 versus 8 (all p<0.05). Conclusion This multicentre study reports a negative effect in VA outcomes of fluid volume fluctuations during the maintenance phase in specific fluid compartments, suggesting that anatomical and functional treatment response patterns may be fluid-specific. Data are available in a public, open access repository. Zarranz-Ventura J. (n.d.). Data from: FRB Spain IMAGE nAMD Report 2. Dryad Digital Repository, March 30, 2024. ().
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Ophthalmology (BJO) is an international peer-reviewed journal for ophthalmologists and visual science specialists. BJO publishes clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations related to ophthalmology. It also provides major reviews and also publishes manuscripts covering regional issues in a global context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信