应用胸腹再平衡(TAR)方法治疗中度早产儿的效果:随机对照临床试验

IF 2
Jaqueline Lomônaco Lemos, Denise Iunes, Aline Roberta Danaga, Carmélia Rocha, Juliana Bassalobre Carvalho Borges
{"title":"应用胸腹再平衡(TAR)方法治疗中度早产儿的效果:随机对照临床试验","authors":"Jaqueline Lomônaco Lemos, Denise Iunes, Aline Roberta Danaga, Carmélia Rocha, Juliana Bassalobre Carvalho Borges","doi":"10.1590/1984-0462/2025/43/2024069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the effect of the thoracoabdominal rebalancing (TAR) method on respiratory biomechanics, respiratory discomfort, pain sensation, and physiological parameters in moderate preterm newborns, compared to a control group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized clinical trial was conducted in a neonatal intensive care unit. The evaluation included: Neonatal Infant Pain Scale, physiological parameters, Silverman-Andersen score, and biomechanics (thoracic cirtometry and Charpy angle). The newborns were randomized into the TAR group (n=17) or control group (n=13) and subjected to the slow expiratory flow acceleration technique (SEFA). The evaluation of a single session was performed three times: before, after, and 30 minutes after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the intergroup comparison, there was a significant difference in respiratory rate 30 minutes after the intervention. There was no significant difference in intra- and intergroup comparisons for pain and respiratory discomfort. Regarding biomechanics, there was a significant difference in the TAR group in the Charpy angle (between assessments 1 and 2), in the axillary cirtometry (between assessments 1 and 3), and in the xiphoid process (between assessments 2 and 3). In the control group, a significant difference was observed in the axillary line (between assessments 1 and 2; 2 and 3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TAR method showed a positive effect on respiratory rate and respiratory biomechanics when compared to the control group. In both groups, the techniques did not promote respiratory discomfort or pain sensation, making them safe techniques for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":74721,"journal":{"name":"Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo","volume":"43 ","pages":"e2024069"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11748499/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of application of the thoracoabdominal rebalancing (TAR) method in moderate premature children: randomized and controlled clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Jaqueline Lomônaco Lemos, Denise Iunes, Aline Roberta Danaga, Carmélia Rocha, Juliana Bassalobre Carvalho Borges\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1984-0462/2025/43/2024069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the effect of the thoracoabdominal rebalancing (TAR) method on respiratory biomechanics, respiratory discomfort, pain sensation, and physiological parameters in moderate preterm newborns, compared to a control group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized clinical trial was conducted in a neonatal intensive care unit. The evaluation included: Neonatal Infant Pain Scale, physiological parameters, Silverman-Andersen score, and biomechanics (thoracic cirtometry and Charpy angle). The newborns were randomized into the TAR group (n=17) or control group (n=13) and subjected to the slow expiratory flow acceleration technique (SEFA). The evaluation of a single session was performed three times: before, after, and 30 minutes after the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the intergroup comparison, there was a significant difference in respiratory rate 30 minutes after the intervention. There was no significant difference in intra- and intergroup comparisons for pain and respiratory discomfort. Regarding biomechanics, there was a significant difference in the TAR group in the Charpy angle (between assessments 1 and 2), in the axillary cirtometry (between assessments 1 and 3), and in the xiphoid process (between assessments 2 and 3). In the control group, a significant difference was observed in the axillary line (between assessments 1 and 2; 2 and 3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TAR method showed a positive effect on respiratory rate and respiratory biomechanics when compared to the control group. In both groups, the techniques did not promote respiratory discomfort or pain sensation, making them safe techniques for this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo\",\"volume\":\"43 \",\"pages\":\"e2024069\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11748499/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-0462/2025/43/2024069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-0462/2025/43/2024069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析胸腹再平衡法(TAR)对中度早产新生儿呼吸生物力学、呼吸不适、疼痛感觉及生理参数的影响,并与对照组进行比较。方法:本随机临床试验在新生儿重症监护病房进行。评估包括:新生儿疼痛量表、生理参数、Silverman-Andersen评分和生物力学(胸围和Charpy角)。将新生儿随机分为TAR组(n=17)和对照组(n=13),分别进行慢呼气流加速技术(SEFA)治疗。对单个疗程进行三次评估:干预前、干预后和干预后30分钟。结果:两组比较,干预后30分钟呼吸频率差异有统计学意义。疼痛和呼吸不适在组内和组间比较无显著差异。在生物力学方面,TAR组在Charpy角(评估1和2之间)、腋窝测圆(评估1和3之间)和剑突(评估2和3之间)方面存在显著差异。在对照组中,腋窝线(评估1和2之间)存在显著差异;结论:与对照组相比,TAR法对呼吸频率和呼吸生物力学均有积极影响。在这两组中,这种技术都没有引起呼吸不适或疼痛感,对这一人群来说是安全的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effect of application of the thoracoabdominal rebalancing (TAR) method in moderate premature children: randomized and controlled clinical trial.

Effect of application of the thoracoabdominal rebalancing (TAR) method in moderate premature children: randomized and controlled clinical trial.

Effect of application of the thoracoabdominal rebalancing (TAR) method in moderate premature children: randomized and controlled clinical trial.

Objective: To analyze the effect of the thoracoabdominal rebalancing (TAR) method on respiratory biomechanics, respiratory discomfort, pain sensation, and physiological parameters in moderate preterm newborns, compared to a control group.

Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted in a neonatal intensive care unit. The evaluation included: Neonatal Infant Pain Scale, physiological parameters, Silverman-Andersen score, and biomechanics (thoracic cirtometry and Charpy angle). The newborns were randomized into the TAR group (n=17) or control group (n=13) and subjected to the slow expiratory flow acceleration technique (SEFA). The evaluation of a single session was performed three times: before, after, and 30 minutes after the intervention.

Results: In the intergroup comparison, there was a significant difference in respiratory rate 30 minutes after the intervention. There was no significant difference in intra- and intergroup comparisons for pain and respiratory discomfort. Regarding biomechanics, there was a significant difference in the TAR group in the Charpy angle (between assessments 1 and 2), in the axillary cirtometry (between assessments 1 and 3), and in the xiphoid process (between assessments 2 and 3). In the control group, a significant difference was observed in the axillary line (between assessments 1 and 2; 2 and 3).

Conclusions: The TAR method showed a positive effect on respiratory rate and respiratory biomechanics when compared to the control group. In both groups, the techniques did not promote respiratory discomfort or pain sensation, making them safe techniques for this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信