社区聚会场所与基洪量表得分的关系:JAGES纵向研究。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1177/10105395241313148
Yuta Mori, Kazushige Ide, Ryota Watanabe, Meiko Yokoyama, Taishi Tsuji, Genmei Iizuka, Kaori Yamaguchi, Takuto Miyazawa, Katsunori Kondo
{"title":"社区聚会场所与基洪量表得分的关系:JAGES纵向研究。","authors":"Yuta Mori, Kazushige Ide, Ryota Watanabe, Meiko Yokoyama, Taishi Tsuji, Genmei Iizuka, Kaori Yamaguchi, Takuto Miyazawa, Katsunori Kondo","doi":"10.1177/10105395241313148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the number of program types and CGA in community gathering places to gain valid insights into the provision of programs in community gathering places. The study was longitudinal in nature and used prospective cohort data from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study. The participants were 8758 older adults recruited from 28 cities and towns. The dependent variable was the CGA using the KCL. The independent variable was the number of program types in community gathering places. The participants were classified under four groups, namely, No Participation, One Type, Two Types, and More Than Three Types. The study performed linear regression analysis. The mean of the KCL scores by the number of types was 3.8 ± 3.3, 3.5 ± 3.0, 3.3 ± 2.9, and 3.2 ± 2.8 points for the four groups, respectively. CGA was better for two and three or more types of program participation. CGA at 3 years was better when the community gathering places implemented two or more types of program.</p>","PeriodicalId":55570,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":"297-304"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between the Community Gatherings Places and the Kihon Checklist Score: JAGES Longitudinal Study.\",\"authors\":\"Yuta Mori, Kazushige Ide, Ryota Watanabe, Meiko Yokoyama, Taishi Tsuji, Genmei Iizuka, Kaori Yamaguchi, Takuto Miyazawa, Katsunori Kondo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10105395241313148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the number of program types and CGA in community gathering places to gain valid insights into the provision of programs in community gathering places. The study was longitudinal in nature and used prospective cohort data from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study. The participants were 8758 older adults recruited from 28 cities and towns. The dependent variable was the CGA using the KCL. The independent variable was the number of program types in community gathering places. The participants were classified under four groups, namely, No Participation, One Type, Two Types, and More Than Three Types. The study performed linear regression analysis. The mean of the KCL scores by the number of types was 3.8 ± 3.3, 3.5 ± 3.0, 3.3 ± 2.9, and 3.2 ± 2.8 points for the four groups, respectively. CGA was better for two and three or more types of program participation. CGA at 3 years was better when the community gathering places implemented two or more types of program.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"297-304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10105395241313148\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10105395241313148","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨社区聚会场所项目类型数量与社区文化水平之间的关系,为社区聚会场所的项目提供提供有效的见解。这项研究是纵向的,使用了来自日本老年学评估研究的前瞻性队列数据。参与者是来自28个城镇的8758名老年人。因变量为使用KCL的CGA。自变量为社区聚会场所的项目类型数量。参与者分为四组,即不参与、一类、二类和三类以上。本研究进行线性回归分析。四组KCL分型数的平均值分别为3.8±3.3分、3.5±3.0分、3.3±2.9分和3.2±2.8分。CGA更适合两种和三种或更多类型的项目参与。当社区聚会场所实施两种或两种以上的项目时,3年的CGA效果较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association Between the Community Gatherings Places and the Kihon Checklist Score: JAGES Longitudinal Study.

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the number of program types and CGA in community gathering places to gain valid insights into the provision of programs in community gathering places. The study was longitudinal in nature and used prospective cohort data from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study. The participants were 8758 older adults recruited from 28 cities and towns. The dependent variable was the CGA using the KCL. The independent variable was the number of program types in community gathering places. The participants were classified under four groups, namely, No Participation, One Type, Two Types, and More Than Three Types. The study performed linear regression analysis. The mean of the KCL scores by the number of types was 3.8 ± 3.3, 3.5 ± 3.0, 3.3 ± 2.9, and 3.2 ± 2.8 points for the four groups, respectively. CGA was better for two and three or more types of program participation. CGA at 3 years was better when the community gathering places implemented two or more types of program.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health
Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
147
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health (APJPH) is a peer-reviewed, bimonthly journal that focuses on health issues in the Asia-Pacific Region. APJPH publishes original articles on public health related issues, including implications for practical applications to professional education and services for public health and primary health care that are of concern and relevance to the Asia-Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信