引导手到一个隐形的目标。

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Marcin Furtak, Eli Brenner
{"title":"引导手到一个隐形的目标。","authors":"Marcin Furtak, Eli Brenner","doi":"10.1080/00222895.2025.2455179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Numerous devices are being developed to assist visually impaired and blind individuals in performing everyday tasks such as reaching out to grasp objects. Considering that the size, weight, and cost of assistive devices significantly impact their acceptance, it would be useful to know how effective various types of guiding information can be. As an initial exploration of this issue, we conducted four studies in which participants with normal vision were visually guided toward targets. They were guided by information about the direction to the target, and either about the distance to the target or about the time required to reach the target. We compared participants' performance when provided with different amounts of each of these kinds of information. We found that restricting information about the distance from the target or the time it would take to reach the target to only a few possible values does not affect performance substantially. Restricting information about the direction to the target to only a few possible values appears to be more detrimental, but the disadvantage of having few possible directions can be mitigated by combining values in multiple directions. These findings can help optimize haptic presentations in assistive technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":50125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Motor Behavior","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guiding the Hand to an Invisible Target.\",\"authors\":\"Marcin Furtak, Eli Brenner\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00222895.2025.2455179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Numerous devices are being developed to assist visually impaired and blind individuals in performing everyday tasks such as reaching out to grasp objects. Considering that the size, weight, and cost of assistive devices significantly impact their acceptance, it would be useful to know how effective various types of guiding information can be. As an initial exploration of this issue, we conducted four studies in which participants with normal vision were visually guided toward targets. They were guided by information about the direction to the target, and either about the distance to the target or about the time required to reach the target. We compared participants' performance when provided with different amounts of each of these kinds of information. We found that restricting information about the distance from the target or the time it would take to reach the target to only a few possible values does not affect performance substantially. Restricting information about the direction to the target to only a few possible values appears to be more detrimental, but the disadvantage of having few possible directions can be mitigated by combining values in multiple directions. These findings can help optimize haptic presentations in assistive technology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Motor Behavior\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Motor Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2025.2455179\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Motor Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2025.2455179","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多设备正在被开发出来,以帮助视障人士和盲人完成日常任务,比如伸手抓东西。考虑到辅助设备的尺寸、重量和成本对其接受程度有很大影响,了解各种类型的指导信息的有效性将是有用的。作为这一问题的初步探索,我们进行了四项研究,其中视力正常的参与者被视觉引导到目标。他们根据目标方向的信息,以及到目标的距离或到达目标所需的时间来引导他们。我们比较了参与者在提供不同数量的这类信息时的表现。我们发现,将有关与目标的距离或到达目标所需时间的信息限制为几个可能的值不会对性能产生实质性影响。将有关目标方向的信息限制在几个可能的值中似乎更有害,但可能方向少的缺点可以通过组合多个方向的值来减轻。这些发现有助于优化辅助技术中的触觉表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Guiding the Hand to an Invisible Target.

Numerous devices are being developed to assist visually impaired and blind individuals in performing everyday tasks such as reaching out to grasp objects. Considering that the size, weight, and cost of assistive devices significantly impact their acceptance, it would be useful to know how effective various types of guiding information can be. As an initial exploration of this issue, we conducted four studies in which participants with normal vision were visually guided toward targets. They were guided by information about the direction to the target, and either about the distance to the target or about the time required to reach the target. We compared participants' performance when provided with different amounts of each of these kinds of information. We found that restricting information about the distance from the target or the time it would take to reach the target to only a few possible values does not affect performance substantially. Restricting information about the direction to the target to only a few possible values appears to be more detrimental, but the disadvantage of having few possible directions can be mitigated by combining values in multiple directions. These findings can help optimize haptic presentations in assistive technology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Motor Behavior
Journal of Motor Behavior 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Motor Behavior, a multidisciplinary journal of movement neuroscience, publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of motor control. Articles from different disciplinary perspectives and levels of analysis are encouraged, including neurophysiological, biomechanical, electrophysiological, psychological, mathematical and physical, and clinical approaches. Applied studies are acceptable only to the extent that they provide a significant contribution to a basic issue in motor control. Of special interest to the journal are those articles that attempt to bridge insights from different disciplinary perspectives to infer processes underlying motor control. Those approaches may embrace postural, locomotive, and manipulative aspects of motor functions, as well as coordination of speech articulators and eye movements. Articles dealing with analytical techniques and mathematical modeling are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信