目前用于外科重建的先天性耳廓畸形(CAA)分类综述:范围审查。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Yangyang Lin, Elsa M Ronde, Lieve de Voort, Corstiaan C Breugem
{"title":"目前用于外科重建的先天性耳廓畸形(CAA)分类综述:范围审查。","authors":"Yangyang Lin, Elsa M Ronde, Lieve de Voort, Corstiaan C Breugem","doi":"10.1177/10556656241310101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>CAAs are congenital malformations of the auricle ranging from ear underdevelopment to anotia, lacks standardized classification, impacting our outcome of different reconstruction approaches. This scoping review aimed to explore which CAA classifications are most used in current ear reconstruction practices.</p><p><p>We conducted a scoping review following the PRISMA guidelines, searching MEDLINE and Embase databases on November 1st, 2023. Studies on CAA reconstruction that included clear descriptions of the used classification published in the past 5 years were included. Studies were appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist.</p><p><p>Out of 293 screened studies, 45 met inclusion criteria, encompassing 19 case series and 5 cohort studies. Findings revealed a predominant use of the Nagata classification across rib cartilage and alloplastic material reconstructions, despite noted application inconsistencies. Other systems like Marx's, Weerda's, and Meurman's remain underutilized.</p><p><p>Most studies used the Nagata's classification. Its widespread use underscores the necessity for an easy to use, but standardized classification to improve surgical outcome reporting and assessment accuracy. Further investigation and standardization efforts regarding the Nagata system are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":" ","pages":"10556656241310101"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Overview of the Currently Used Congenital Auricular Anomalies (CAA) Classifications for Surgical Reconstruction: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Yangyang Lin, Elsa M Ronde, Lieve de Voort, Corstiaan C Breugem\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10556656241310101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>CAAs are congenital malformations of the auricle ranging from ear underdevelopment to anotia, lacks standardized classification, impacting our outcome of different reconstruction approaches. This scoping review aimed to explore which CAA classifications are most used in current ear reconstruction practices.</p><p><p>We conducted a scoping review following the PRISMA guidelines, searching MEDLINE and Embase databases on November 1st, 2023. Studies on CAA reconstruction that included clear descriptions of the used classification published in the past 5 years were included. Studies were appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist.</p><p><p>Out of 293 screened studies, 45 met inclusion criteria, encompassing 19 case series and 5 cohort studies. Findings revealed a predominant use of the Nagata classification across rib cartilage and alloplastic material reconstructions, despite noted application inconsistencies. Other systems like Marx's, Weerda's, and Meurman's remain underutilized.</p><p><p>Most studies used the Nagata's classification. Its widespread use underscores the necessity for an easy to use, but standardized classification to improve surgical outcome reporting and assessment accuracy. Further investigation and standardization efforts regarding the Nagata system are recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10556656241310101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241310101\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241310101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

CAAs是先天性耳廓畸形,从耳部发育不全到耳鸣不等,缺乏标准化的分类,影响了我们采用不同重建方法的结果。本综述旨在探讨目前耳部重建实践中最常用的CAA分类。我们按照PRISMA指南进行了范围审查,于2023年11月1日检索MEDLINE和Embase数据库。纳入近5年发表的CAA重构研究,包括对使用分类的明确描述。研究使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的检查表进行评估。在293项筛选研究中,45项符合纳入标准,包括19项病例系列研究和5项队列研究。结果显示Nagata分类主要用于肋软骨和同种异体材料重建,尽管注意到应用不一致。其他体系,如马克思、韦尔达和曼尔曼的体系,仍未得到充分利用。大多数研究使用的是永田分类法。它的广泛使用强调了一种易于使用但标准化的分类的必要性,以提高手术结果报告和评估的准确性。建议对长田系统进行进一步的调查和标准化工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Overview of the Currently Used Congenital Auricular Anomalies (CAA) Classifications for Surgical Reconstruction: A Scoping Review.

CAAs are congenital malformations of the auricle ranging from ear underdevelopment to anotia, lacks standardized classification, impacting our outcome of different reconstruction approaches. This scoping review aimed to explore which CAA classifications are most used in current ear reconstruction practices.

We conducted a scoping review following the PRISMA guidelines, searching MEDLINE and Embase databases on November 1st, 2023. Studies on CAA reconstruction that included clear descriptions of the used classification published in the past 5 years were included. Studies were appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist.

Out of 293 screened studies, 45 met inclusion criteria, encompassing 19 case series and 5 cohort studies. Findings revealed a predominant use of the Nagata classification across rib cartilage and alloplastic material reconstructions, despite noted application inconsistencies. Other systems like Marx's, Weerda's, and Meurman's remain underutilized.

Most studies used the Nagata's classification. Its widespread use underscores the necessity for an easy to use, but standardized classification to improve surgical outcome reporting and assessment accuracy. Further investigation and standardization efforts regarding the Nagata system are recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信