减少吸入皮质类固醇治疗慢性阻塞性肺病。

IF 1.7 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Benji Heran, Thomas L Perry, Ken Bassett
{"title":"减少吸入皮质类固醇治疗慢性阻塞性肺病。","authors":"Benji Heran, Thomas L Perry, Ken Bassett","doi":"10.4102/phcfm.v16i1.4756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This Therapeutic Letter considers the evidence for inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as a treatment for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Drug therapy aims to alleviate symptoms, enhance functional capacity and prevent exacerbations, but has not consistently shown to reduce mortality or improve quality of life based on randomised trials.Inhaled corticosteroids have shown limited benefits for COPD symptoms and exacerbations but increased risks of serious harms. Guidelines recommend limiting ICS to severe COPD and only for repeated exacerbations. Studies show withdrawing ICS can be done safely for stable COPD patients with infrequent exacerbations, especially those with lower eosinophil counts. Provincial, national and international guidelines now recommend limiting ICS prescriptions to severe COPD stages. Long-term ICS use may lead to serious side effects, including pneumonia and fractures. Initial COPD therapy should focus on short-acting bronchodilators, not ICS. Adding long-acting bronchodilators is recommended before considering ICS because of limited benefits and risks of serious harms. For persistent symptoms, long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) or long-acting beta2 agonists (LABA) are recommended, with the addition of ICS reserved for those with repeated exacerbations and severe COPD. Deprescribing ICS can be considered in clinically stable patients, particularly for those with infrequent exacerbations and mild COPD. When applicable, tapering ICS over several months is advised for patients with elevated eosinophil counts. Overall, the risks of serious harms from ICS typically outweigh their limited benefits for mild COPD patients in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":47037,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine","volume":"16 1","pages":"e1-e3"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736534/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimising inhaled corticosteroids for COPD.\",\"authors\":\"Benji Heran, Thomas L Perry, Ken Bassett\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/phcfm.v16i1.4756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This Therapeutic Letter considers the evidence for inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as a treatment for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Drug therapy aims to alleviate symptoms, enhance functional capacity and prevent exacerbations, but has not consistently shown to reduce mortality or improve quality of life based on randomised trials.Inhaled corticosteroids have shown limited benefits for COPD symptoms and exacerbations but increased risks of serious harms. Guidelines recommend limiting ICS to severe COPD and only for repeated exacerbations. Studies show withdrawing ICS can be done safely for stable COPD patients with infrequent exacerbations, especially those with lower eosinophil counts. Provincial, national and international guidelines now recommend limiting ICS prescriptions to severe COPD stages. Long-term ICS use may lead to serious side effects, including pneumonia and fractures. Initial COPD therapy should focus on short-acting bronchodilators, not ICS. Adding long-acting bronchodilators is recommended before considering ICS because of limited benefits and risks of serious harms. For persistent symptoms, long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) or long-acting beta2 agonists (LABA) are recommended, with the addition of ICS reserved for those with repeated exacerbations and severe COPD. Deprescribing ICS can be considered in clinically stable patients, particularly for those with infrequent exacerbations and mild COPD. When applicable, tapering ICS over several months is advised for patients with elevated eosinophil counts. Overall, the risks of serious harms from ICS typically outweigh their limited benefits for mild COPD patients in primary care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"e1-e3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736534/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v16i1.4756\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v16i1.4756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本治疗信考虑了吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)作为慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)治疗的证据。药物治疗旨在缓解症状、增强功能和预防病情恶化,但根据随机试验,并没有一致显示出降低死亡率或改善生活质量的效果。吸入皮质类固醇对慢性阻塞性肺病症状和恶化的益处有限,但会增加严重危害的风险。指南建议将ICS限制在严重COPD患者,且仅限反复加重患者。研究表明,对于病情不频繁加重的稳定期COPD患者,特别是嗜酸性粒细胞计数较低的患者,停用ICS是安全的。省级、国家和国际指南现在建议将ICS处方限制在严重COPD阶段。长期使用ICS可能会导致严重的副作用,包括肺炎和骨折。初始COPD治疗应侧重于短效支气管扩张剂,而不是ICS。在考虑ICS之前,建议添加长效支气管扩张剂,因为ICS的益处有限,而且存在严重危害的风险。对于持续症状,推荐使用长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)或长效β 2激动剂(LABA),并为反复发作和严重COPD患者保留ICS。对于临床稳定的患者,特别是那些不经常发作和轻度COPD的患者,可以考虑减少ICS的处方。如果适用,建议嗜酸性粒细胞计数升高的患者在几个月内逐渐减少ICS。总的来说,在初级保健中,ICS的严重危害风险通常大于其对轻度COPD患者的有限益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Minimising inhaled corticosteroids for COPD.

This Therapeutic Letter considers the evidence for inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as a treatment for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Drug therapy aims to alleviate symptoms, enhance functional capacity and prevent exacerbations, but has not consistently shown to reduce mortality or improve quality of life based on randomised trials.Inhaled corticosteroids have shown limited benefits for COPD symptoms and exacerbations but increased risks of serious harms. Guidelines recommend limiting ICS to severe COPD and only for repeated exacerbations. Studies show withdrawing ICS can be done safely for stable COPD patients with infrequent exacerbations, especially those with lower eosinophil counts. Provincial, national and international guidelines now recommend limiting ICS prescriptions to severe COPD stages. Long-term ICS use may lead to serious side effects, including pneumonia and fractures. Initial COPD therapy should focus on short-acting bronchodilators, not ICS. Adding long-acting bronchodilators is recommended before considering ICS because of limited benefits and risks of serious harms. For persistent symptoms, long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) or long-acting beta2 agonists (LABA) are recommended, with the addition of ICS reserved for those with repeated exacerbations and severe COPD. Deprescribing ICS can be considered in clinically stable patients, particularly for those with infrequent exacerbations and mild COPD. When applicable, tapering ICS over several months is advised for patients with elevated eosinophil counts. Overall, the risks of serious harms from ICS typically outweigh their limited benefits for mild COPD patients in primary care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信