COVID-19对免疫介导的风湿性疾病患者的影响:6个月内疾病活动性、疲劳和心理困扰的比较研究

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Claudia Marques, Marcelo M Pinheiro, Jennifer Lopes, Sandra Lúcia Euzébio Ribeiro, Mary Vânia Marinho de Castro, Lilian David de Azevedo Valadares, Aline Ranzolin, Nicole Pamplona Bueno de Andrade, Rafaela Cavalheiro do Espírito Santo, Nafice Costa Araújo, Cintya Martins Vieira, Valéria Valim, Flavia Patricia Sena Teixeira Santos, Laurindo Ferreira da Rocha, Adriana Maria Kakehasi, Ana Paula Monteiro Gomides Reis, Edgard Torres Dos Reis-Neto, Gecilmara Salviato Pileggi, Gilda Aparecida Ferreira, Licia Maria Henrique da Mota, Odirlei Monticielo, Ricardo Machado Xavier
{"title":"COVID-19对免疫介导的风湿性疾病患者的影响:6个月内疾病活动性、疲劳和心理困扰的比较研究","authors":"Claudia Marques, Marcelo M Pinheiro, Jennifer Lopes, Sandra Lúcia Euzébio Ribeiro, Mary Vânia Marinho de Castro, Lilian David de Azevedo Valadares, Aline Ranzolin, Nicole Pamplona Bueno de Andrade, Rafaela Cavalheiro do Espírito Santo, Nafice Costa Araújo, Cintya Martins Vieira, Valéria Valim, Flavia Patricia Sena Teixeira Santos, Laurindo Ferreira da Rocha, Adriana Maria Kakehasi, Ana Paula Monteiro Gomides Reis, Edgard Torres Dos Reis-Neto, Gecilmara Salviato Pileggi, Gilda Aparecida Ferreira, Licia Maria Henrique da Mota, Odirlei Monticielo, Ricardo Machado Xavier","doi":"10.1186/s42358-025-00434-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the impact of COVID-19 on the clinical status and psychological distress of patients with immune-mediated rheumatic disease (IMRD) caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection with that of noninfected IMRD controls during a 6-month follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ReumaCoV Brazil is a longitudinal study designed to follow IMRD patients for 6 months after COVID-19 (patients) compared with IMRD patients without COVID-19 (controls). Clinical data, disease activity measurements and current treatments regarding IMRD and COVID-19 outcomes were evaluated in all patients. Disease activity was assessed through validated tools at inclusion and at 3 and 6 months post-COVID-19. Fatigue, using FACIT-F (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy) and psychological distress, using DASS 21 (Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale - 21 Items), used to evaluated psychological distress, were evaluated at 6 months after COVID-19 in both groups. The significance level was set as p < 0.05, with a 95% confidence interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 601 patients were evaluated-321 patients (IMRD COVID-19 + patients) and 280 controls (IMRD COVID-19- patients)-who were predominantly female with similar median ages. Disease activity assessment over a 6-month follow-up showed no significant difference between cases and controls. Although the mean activity scores did not differ significantly, some patients reported worsened disease activity post-COVID-19, particularly in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (32.2%) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients (23.3%). Post-COVID-19 worsening in RA patients correlated with medical global assessment (MGA) and CDAI scores, with a moderate to large effect size. Diabetes mellitus showed a positive association (OR = 7.15), while TNF inhibitors had a protective effect (OR = 0.51). Fatigue, depression, anxiety, and stress were significantly greater in patients than in controls. Worse disease activity post-COVID-19 correlated with worse FACIT-F and DASS-21 scores in RA patients. No significant associations were found between COVID-19 outcomes and post-COVID-19 disease activity, FACIT-F or DASS-21.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Post-COVID-19 IMRD patients exhibited significant fatigue, depression, anxiety, and stress, which can be mistaken for disease activity, despite having similar disease activity scores. The variability in reports on IMRD flares and the potential triggering of SARS-CoV-2 for autoimmune manifestations underscore the need for detailed clinical assessment and a comprehensive approach to managing them.</p>","PeriodicalId":48634,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Rheumatology","volume":"65 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 on patients with immune-mediated rheumatic disease: a comparative study of disease activity, fatigue, and psychological distress over six months.\",\"authors\":\"Claudia Marques, Marcelo M Pinheiro, Jennifer Lopes, Sandra Lúcia Euzébio Ribeiro, Mary Vânia Marinho de Castro, Lilian David de Azevedo Valadares, Aline Ranzolin, Nicole Pamplona Bueno de Andrade, Rafaela Cavalheiro do Espírito Santo, Nafice Costa Araújo, Cintya Martins Vieira, Valéria Valim, Flavia Patricia Sena Teixeira Santos, Laurindo Ferreira da Rocha, Adriana Maria Kakehasi, Ana Paula Monteiro Gomides Reis, Edgard Torres Dos Reis-Neto, Gecilmara Salviato Pileggi, Gilda Aparecida Ferreira, Licia Maria Henrique da Mota, Odirlei Monticielo, Ricardo Machado Xavier\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42358-025-00434-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the impact of COVID-19 on the clinical status and psychological distress of patients with immune-mediated rheumatic disease (IMRD) caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection with that of noninfected IMRD controls during a 6-month follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The ReumaCoV Brazil is a longitudinal study designed to follow IMRD patients for 6 months after COVID-19 (patients) compared with IMRD patients without COVID-19 (controls). Clinical data, disease activity measurements and current treatments regarding IMRD and COVID-19 outcomes were evaluated in all patients. Disease activity was assessed through validated tools at inclusion and at 3 and 6 months post-COVID-19. Fatigue, using FACIT-F (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy) and psychological distress, using DASS 21 (Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale - 21 Items), used to evaluated psychological distress, were evaluated at 6 months after COVID-19 in both groups. The significance level was set as p < 0.05, with a 95% confidence interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 601 patients were evaluated-321 patients (IMRD COVID-19 + patients) and 280 controls (IMRD COVID-19- patients)-who were predominantly female with similar median ages. Disease activity assessment over a 6-month follow-up showed no significant difference between cases and controls. Although the mean activity scores did not differ significantly, some patients reported worsened disease activity post-COVID-19, particularly in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (32.2%) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients (23.3%). Post-COVID-19 worsening in RA patients correlated with medical global assessment (MGA) and CDAI scores, with a moderate to large effect size. Diabetes mellitus showed a positive association (OR = 7.15), while TNF inhibitors had a protective effect (OR = 0.51). Fatigue, depression, anxiety, and stress were significantly greater in patients than in controls. Worse disease activity post-COVID-19 correlated with worse FACIT-F and DASS-21 scores in RA patients. No significant associations were found between COVID-19 outcomes and post-COVID-19 disease activity, FACIT-F or DASS-21.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Post-COVID-19 IMRD patients exhibited significant fatigue, depression, anxiety, and stress, which can be mistaken for disease activity, despite having similar disease activity scores. The variability in reports on IMRD flares and the potential triggering of SARS-CoV-2 for autoimmune manifestations underscore the need for detailed clinical assessment and a comprehensive approach to managing them.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42358-025-00434-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42358-025-00434-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在为期6个月的随访期间,比较COVID-19对SARS-CoV-2感染免疫介导性风湿病(IMRD)患者与未感染IMRD对照组临床状况和心理困扰的影响。方法:ReumaCoV巴西是一项纵向研究,旨在对COVID-19后IMRD患者(患者)与未感染COVID-19的IMRD患者(对照组)进行为期6个月的随访。对所有患者的IMRD和COVID-19结局的临床数据、疾病活动度测量和当前治疗进行评估。在纳入研究时以及covid -19后3个月和6个月,通过经过验证的工具评估疾病活动性。采用FACIT-F(慢性疾病治疗功能评估)和用于评估心理困扰的DASS 21(抑郁、焦虑和压力量表- 21项)对两组患者在COVID-19后6个月进行疲劳评估。结果:共评估601例患者,其中321例患者(IMRD COVID-19 +患者)和280例对照组(IMRD COVID-19-患者),主要为女性,中位年龄相似。在6个月的随访中,疾病活动评估显示病例和对照组之间没有显著差异。虽然平均活动度评分没有显著差异,但一些患者报告covid -19后疾病活动度恶化,特别是类风湿性关节炎(RA)(32.2%)和系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者(23.3%)。RA患者的covid -19后恶化与医学总体评估(MGA)和CDAI评分相关,具有中等到较大的效应量。糖尿病表现为正相关(OR = 7.15),而TNF抑制剂具有保护作用(OR = 0.51)。患者的疲劳、抑郁、焦虑和压力明显高于对照组。RA患者在covid -19后疾病活动性较差与FACIT-F和DASS-21评分较差相关。FACIT-F或DASS-21未发现COVID-19结局与COVID-19后疾病活动之间存在显著关联。结论:covid -19后IMRD患者表现出明显的疲劳、抑郁、焦虑和压力,尽管疾病活动性评分相似,但这些症状可能被误认为是疾病活动性。关于IMRD耀斑的报告的可变性以及自身免疫性表现可能触发SARS-CoV-2的情况强调了详细临床评估和综合管理方法的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COVID-19 on patients with immune-mediated rheumatic disease: a comparative study of disease activity, fatigue, and psychological distress over six months.

Objectives: To compare the impact of COVID-19 on the clinical status and psychological distress of patients with immune-mediated rheumatic disease (IMRD) caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection with that of noninfected IMRD controls during a 6-month follow-up period.

Methods: The ReumaCoV Brazil is a longitudinal study designed to follow IMRD patients for 6 months after COVID-19 (patients) compared with IMRD patients without COVID-19 (controls). Clinical data, disease activity measurements and current treatments regarding IMRD and COVID-19 outcomes were evaluated in all patients. Disease activity was assessed through validated tools at inclusion and at 3 and 6 months post-COVID-19. Fatigue, using FACIT-F (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy) and psychological distress, using DASS 21 (Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale - 21 Items), used to evaluated psychological distress, were evaluated at 6 months after COVID-19 in both groups. The significance level was set as p < 0.05, with a 95% confidence interval.

Results: A total of 601 patients were evaluated-321 patients (IMRD COVID-19 + patients) and 280 controls (IMRD COVID-19- patients)-who were predominantly female with similar median ages. Disease activity assessment over a 6-month follow-up showed no significant difference between cases and controls. Although the mean activity scores did not differ significantly, some patients reported worsened disease activity post-COVID-19, particularly in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (32.2%) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients (23.3%). Post-COVID-19 worsening in RA patients correlated with medical global assessment (MGA) and CDAI scores, with a moderate to large effect size. Diabetes mellitus showed a positive association (OR = 7.15), while TNF inhibitors had a protective effect (OR = 0.51). Fatigue, depression, anxiety, and stress were significantly greater in patients than in controls. Worse disease activity post-COVID-19 correlated with worse FACIT-F and DASS-21 scores in RA patients. No significant associations were found between COVID-19 outcomes and post-COVID-19 disease activity, FACIT-F or DASS-21.

Conclusions: Post-COVID-19 IMRD patients exhibited significant fatigue, depression, anxiety, and stress, which can be mistaken for disease activity, despite having similar disease activity scores. The variability in reports on IMRD flares and the potential triggering of SARS-CoV-2 for autoimmune manifestations underscore the need for detailed clinical assessment and a comprehensive approach to managing them.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Rheumatology
Advances in Rheumatology Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
41
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊介绍: Formerly named Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia, the journal is celebrating its 60th year of publication. Advances in Rheumatology is an international, open access journal publishing pre-clinical, translational and clinical studies on all aspects of paediatric and adult rheumatic diseases, including degenerative, inflammatory and autoimmune conditions. The journal is the official publication of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology and welcomes original research (including systematic reviews and meta-analyses), literature reviews, guidelines and letters arising from published material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信