影响无并发症尿路感染妇女使用免抗生素治疗方法的因素:一项范围审查方案。

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JBI evidence synthesis Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-02 DOI:10.11124/JBIES-24-00159
Stefania Di Gangi, Stefan Neuner-Jehle, Robin Baumann, Andreas Plate
{"title":"影响无并发症尿路感染妇女使用免抗生素治疗方法的因素:一项范围审查方案。","authors":"Stefania Di Gangi, Stefan Neuner-Jehle, Robin Baumann, Andreas Plate","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review will explore the evidence on factors influencing the decision to use antibiotic-sparing treatments in women with uncomplicated urinary tract infections.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Overuse and misuse of antibiotics are the main drivers of antimicrobial resistance. Antibiotic-sparing treatments, such as symptomatic treatment with analgesics and delayed prescriptions, have considerable potential to reduce antibiotic consumption, but the majority of patients still receive antibiotics without delay. The reasons for the poor implementation of these alternative approaches are unknown. A better understanding of the factors influencing treatment decisions is needed.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will consider the experiences and attitudes of health care professionals and women in outpatient settings in high-income countries, regarding the use of antibiotic-sparing treatments for the diagnosis or suspected diagnosis of uncomplicated urinary tract infections (ie, healthy women aged 18-64 years who are not pregnant, immunosuppressed, and have no functional or structural urinary tract abnormalities).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, and the Cochrane Library will be searched to identify peer-reviewed articles: original research (quantitative or qualitative studies, experimental, or observational), reviews, case reports, and case series. Gray literature will also be searched for. Sources in any language from 2000 to 2024 will be included. Three reviewers will screen the sources and extract data using a tool developed by the reviewers. The analysis will use counts and descriptive qualitative content analysis. The results will be presented in visual, tabular, and narrative formats.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework osf.io/t8y5e/.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1266-1273"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors affecting decisions to use antibiotic-sparing treatment approaches in women with uncomplicated urinary tract infections: a scoping review protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Stefania Di Gangi, Stefan Neuner-Jehle, Robin Baumann, Andreas Plate\",\"doi\":\"10.11124/JBIES-24-00159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review will explore the evidence on factors influencing the decision to use antibiotic-sparing treatments in women with uncomplicated urinary tract infections.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Overuse and misuse of antibiotics are the main drivers of antimicrobial resistance. Antibiotic-sparing treatments, such as symptomatic treatment with analgesics and delayed prescriptions, have considerable potential to reduce antibiotic consumption, but the majority of patients still receive antibiotics without delay. The reasons for the poor implementation of these alternative approaches are unknown. A better understanding of the factors influencing treatment decisions is needed.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will consider the experiences and attitudes of health care professionals and women in outpatient settings in high-income countries, regarding the use of antibiotic-sparing treatments for the diagnosis or suspected diagnosis of uncomplicated urinary tract infections (ie, healthy women aged 18-64 years who are not pregnant, immunosuppressed, and have no functional or structural urinary tract abnormalities).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, and the Cochrane Library will be searched to identify peer-reviewed articles: original research (quantitative or qualitative studies, experimental, or observational), reviews, case reports, and case series. Gray literature will also be searched for. Sources in any language from 2000 to 2024 will be included. Three reviewers will screen the sources and extract data using a tool developed by the reviewers. The analysis will use counts and descriptive qualitative content analysis. The results will be presented in visual, tabular, and narrative formats.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework osf.io/t8y5e/.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBI evidence synthesis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1266-1273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBI evidence synthesis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00159\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本综述将探讨影响无并发症尿路感染妇女使用免抗生素治疗决策的因素的证据。抗生素的过度使用和误用是抗菌素耐药性的主要驱动因素。节省抗生素的治疗,如使用止痛剂和延迟处方的对症治疗,具有相当大的减少抗生素消耗的潜力,但大多数患者仍然毫不拖延地接受抗生素治疗。这些替代方法执行不力的原因尚不清楚。需要更好地了解影响治疗决策的因素。纳入标准:本综述将考虑高收入国家门诊卫生保健专业人员和妇女在诊断或疑似诊断无并发症尿路感染(即18-64岁未怀孕、免疫抑制、无功能或结构尿路异常的健康妇女)时使用免抗生素治疗的经验和态度。方法:本综述将遵循JBI方法进行范围综述。将检索MEDLINE (Ovid)、Embase和Cochrane图书馆,以确定同行评议的文章:原始研究(定量或定性研究、实验或观察性研究)、综述、病例报告和病例系列。灰色文献也将被搜索。从2000年到2024年的任何语言的来源都将包括在内。三个审稿人将使用审稿人开发的工具筛选源并提取数据。分析将使用计数和描述性定性内容分析。结果将以视觉、表格和叙述的形式呈现。该审查项目的详细信息可在开放科学框架中找到:https://osf.io/t8y5e/。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors affecting decisions to use antibiotic-sparing treatment approaches in women with uncomplicated urinary tract infections: a scoping review protocol.

Objective: This scoping review will explore the evidence on factors influencing the decision to use antibiotic-sparing treatments in women with uncomplicated urinary tract infections.

Introduction: Overuse and misuse of antibiotics are the main drivers of antimicrobial resistance. Antibiotic-sparing treatments, such as symptomatic treatment with analgesics and delayed prescriptions, have considerable potential to reduce antibiotic consumption, but the majority of patients still receive antibiotics without delay. The reasons for the poor implementation of these alternative approaches are unknown. A better understanding of the factors influencing treatment decisions is needed.

Inclusion criteria: This review will consider the experiences and attitudes of health care professionals and women in outpatient settings in high-income countries, regarding the use of antibiotic-sparing treatments for the diagnosis or suspected diagnosis of uncomplicated urinary tract infections (ie, healthy women aged 18-64 years who are not pregnant, immunosuppressed, and have no functional or structural urinary tract abnormalities).

Methods: This review will follow the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, and the Cochrane Library will be searched to identify peer-reviewed articles: original research (quantitative or qualitative studies, experimental, or observational), reviews, case reports, and case series. Gray literature will also be searched for. Sources in any language from 2000 to 2024 will be included. Three reviewers will screen the sources and extract data using a tool developed by the reviewers. The analysis will use counts and descriptive qualitative content analysis. The results will be presented in visual, tabular, and narrative formats.

Review registration: Open Science Framework osf.io/t8y5e/.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JBI evidence synthesis
JBI evidence synthesis Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
218
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信