使用PediSTAT应用程序的护理人员在沙特阿拉伯工作,以减少儿科患者用药错误的风险。

IF 1.4 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Nesrin Alharthy, Raghad Abuhaimed, Munirah Alturki, Shatha Alanazi, Raghad Althaqeb, Alanowd Alghaith, Abdullah Alshibani
{"title":"使用PediSTAT应用程序的护理人员在沙特阿拉伯工作,以减少儿科患者用药错误的风险。","authors":"Nesrin Alharthy, Raghad Abuhaimed, Munirah Alturki, Shatha Alanazi, Raghad Althaqeb, Alanowd Alghaith, Abdullah Alshibani","doi":"10.3390/pediatric17010009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess and compare the rates of medication error (ME) using the PediSTAT application compared to the conventional method of calculating the correct dose and determining the appropriate route of medication administration for common pediatric emergencies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cross-sectional study design was used for the study. Data were collected using a questionnaire that was distributed to certified paramedics holding a bachelor's degrees or higher and working in Riyadh City, Saudi Arabia. Alternate simple random sampling was used to recruit the participants into two groups using the same questionnaire: the PediSTAT group and the conventional method group. The questionnaire contained four pediatric emergency vignettes: cardiac arrest, asthma exacerbation, seizures, and hypoglycemia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 63 participants agreed to the study. Almost 80% of them were males, 81% held bachelor's degrees, and 87% were certified in pediatric resuscitation courses. The findings of the study showed that the use of the PediSTAT application increased accuracy and reduced the risk of ME for common pediatric emergencies. This was shown to be statistically significant for asthma medication dose (<i>p</i>-value < 0.001, 95% CI 0.034-0.352), midazolam dose (<i>p</i>-value = 0.012, 95% CI 0.030-0.764), and hypoglycemia medication dose (<i>p</i>-value < 0.001, 95% CI 0.046, 0.452).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study findings supported the use of standardized precalculated applications such as PediSTAT, which was shown to reduce the risk of ME in prehospital care for pediatric emergencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":45251,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Reports","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755567/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Use of PediSTAT Application by Paramedics Working in Saudi Arabia to Reduce the Risk of Medication Error for Pediatric Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Nesrin Alharthy, Raghad Abuhaimed, Munirah Alturki, Shatha Alanazi, Raghad Althaqeb, Alanowd Alghaith, Abdullah Alshibani\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/pediatric17010009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess and compare the rates of medication error (ME) using the PediSTAT application compared to the conventional method of calculating the correct dose and determining the appropriate route of medication administration for common pediatric emergencies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cross-sectional study design was used for the study. Data were collected using a questionnaire that was distributed to certified paramedics holding a bachelor's degrees or higher and working in Riyadh City, Saudi Arabia. Alternate simple random sampling was used to recruit the participants into two groups using the same questionnaire: the PediSTAT group and the conventional method group. The questionnaire contained four pediatric emergency vignettes: cardiac arrest, asthma exacerbation, seizures, and hypoglycemia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 63 participants agreed to the study. Almost 80% of them were males, 81% held bachelor's degrees, and 87% were certified in pediatric resuscitation courses. The findings of the study showed that the use of the PediSTAT application increased accuracy and reduced the risk of ME for common pediatric emergencies. This was shown to be statistically significant for asthma medication dose (<i>p</i>-value < 0.001, 95% CI 0.034-0.352), midazolam dose (<i>p</i>-value = 0.012, 95% CI 0.030-0.764), and hypoglycemia medication dose (<i>p</i>-value < 0.001, 95% CI 0.046, 0.452).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study findings supported the use of standardized precalculated applications such as PediSTAT, which was shown to reduce the risk of ME in prehospital care for pediatric emergencies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Reports\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755567/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/pediatric17010009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pediatric17010009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:本研究旨在评估和比较使用PediSTAT应用程序与传统方法在计算正确剂量和确定适当给药途径方面的给药错误率。方法:采用前瞻性横断面研究设计。数据是通过问卷收集的,问卷分发给持有学士学位或更高学位并在沙特阿拉伯利雅得市工作的持证护理人员。采用交替的简单随机抽样方法,使用相同的问卷将参与者分为两组:PediSTAT组和常规方法组。问卷包含四个儿科急诊小插曲:心脏骤停、哮喘加重、癫痫发作和低血糖。结果:共有63名参与者同意这项研究。其中近80%为男性,81%拥有学士学位,87%获得儿科复苏课程认证。研究结果表明,使用PediSTAT应用程序提高了准确性,并降低了常见儿科急诊ME的风险。哮喘用药剂量(p值< 0.001,95% CI 0.034-0.352)、咪达唑仑剂量(p值= 0.012,95% CI 0.030-0.764)和降糖用药剂量(p值< 0.001,95% CI 0.046, 0.452)均有统计学意义。结论:研究结果支持使用标准化的预先计算的应用程序,如PediSTAT,它被证明可以降低儿科急诊院前护理中ME的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Use of PediSTAT Application by Paramedics Working in Saudi Arabia to Reduce the Risk of Medication Error for Pediatric Patients.

Background/objectives: This study aimed to assess and compare the rates of medication error (ME) using the PediSTAT application compared to the conventional method of calculating the correct dose and determining the appropriate route of medication administration for common pediatric emergencies.

Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study design was used for the study. Data were collected using a questionnaire that was distributed to certified paramedics holding a bachelor's degrees or higher and working in Riyadh City, Saudi Arabia. Alternate simple random sampling was used to recruit the participants into two groups using the same questionnaire: the PediSTAT group and the conventional method group. The questionnaire contained four pediatric emergency vignettes: cardiac arrest, asthma exacerbation, seizures, and hypoglycemia.

Results: A total of 63 participants agreed to the study. Almost 80% of them were males, 81% held bachelor's degrees, and 87% were certified in pediatric resuscitation courses. The findings of the study showed that the use of the PediSTAT application increased accuracy and reduced the risk of ME for common pediatric emergencies. This was shown to be statistically significant for asthma medication dose (p-value < 0.001, 95% CI 0.034-0.352), midazolam dose (p-value = 0.012, 95% CI 0.030-0.764), and hypoglycemia medication dose (p-value < 0.001, 95% CI 0.046, 0.452).

Conclusions: The study findings supported the use of standardized precalculated applications such as PediSTAT, which was shown to reduce the risk of ME in prehospital care for pediatric emergencies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Reports
Pediatric Reports PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信