{"title":"多重pcr技术预测多态抗原M、N、S和S及其等位基因与mia相关杂交糖蛋白之间的关系。","authors":"Thanaporn Kerdthip, Oytip Nathalang, Sarisa Chidtrakoon, Tanaporn Choychimplee, Dollapak Apipongrat, Kamphon Intharanut","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-86179-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Serological typing of MNS polymorphic antigens - M, N, S and s - remains a fundamental technique in transfusion medicine and prenatal care, providing essential information for matching blood donors and recipients and managing haemolytic disease. Although this method is well proven and routinely used, it is not a comprehensive solution, as it has several weaknesses. Alternatively, multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a commonly used genotyping tool due to its potency and ability to amplify several DNA targets simultaneously in a single reaction. In this work, we aimed to develop multiplex PCR and evaluate its performance for GYPA*M, GYPA*N, GYPB*S, and GYPB*s allele identification using serological and DNA sequencing methods. We also aimed to investigate the correlation between these alleles and Mi<sup>a</sup>-associated hybrid glycophorins (GPs). Remarkably, multiplex PCR was well optimised, and the results aligned with serological phenotyping and DNA sequencing data with maximum accuracy and reliability; this confirmed our findings on its validity in predicting MNSs phenotypes. In addition, this work strongly demonstrates, for the first time, a moderate correlation between the GYPA*M/M and GYPB*s/s genotypes and Mi<sup>a</sup>-associated hybrid GPs among Thai donors. Individuals with the GYPA*M/M and GYPB*s/s genotypes, predicted M + N - S- s + phenotypes, will thus most likely to express the Mi(a+) antigen. Nevertheless, further studies are required to validate these results and elucidate the underlying correlations.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"2815"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11754802/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiplex-PCR technique to predict polymorphic antigens - M, N, S and s - and associations between their alleles and Mi<sup>a</sup>-associated hybrid glycophorins.\",\"authors\":\"Thanaporn Kerdthip, Oytip Nathalang, Sarisa Chidtrakoon, Tanaporn Choychimplee, Dollapak Apipongrat, Kamphon Intharanut\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-86179-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Serological typing of MNS polymorphic antigens - M, N, S and s - remains a fundamental technique in transfusion medicine and prenatal care, providing essential information for matching blood donors and recipients and managing haemolytic disease. Although this method is well proven and routinely used, it is not a comprehensive solution, as it has several weaknesses. Alternatively, multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a commonly used genotyping tool due to its potency and ability to amplify several DNA targets simultaneously in a single reaction. In this work, we aimed to develop multiplex PCR and evaluate its performance for GYPA*M, GYPA*N, GYPB*S, and GYPB*s allele identification using serological and DNA sequencing methods. We also aimed to investigate the correlation between these alleles and Mi<sup>a</sup>-associated hybrid glycophorins (GPs). Remarkably, multiplex PCR was well optimised, and the results aligned with serological phenotyping and DNA sequencing data with maximum accuracy and reliability; this confirmed our findings on its validity in predicting MNSs phenotypes. In addition, this work strongly demonstrates, for the first time, a moderate correlation between the GYPA*M/M and GYPB*s/s genotypes and Mi<sup>a</sup>-associated hybrid GPs among Thai donors. Individuals with the GYPA*M/M and GYPB*s/s genotypes, predicted M + N - S- s + phenotypes, will thus most likely to express the Mi(a+) antigen. Nevertheless, further studies are required to validate these results and elucidate the underlying correlations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"2815\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11754802/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86179-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86179-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
MNS多态性抗原(M, N, S和S)的血清学分型仍然是输血医学和产前护理的一项基本技术,为匹配献血者和受体以及管理溶血疾病提供重要信息。尽管这种方法已经得到了很好的证明,并且经常使用,但它并不是一个全面的解决方案,因为它有几个弱点。另外,多重聚合酶链反应(PCR)是一种常用的基因分型工具,因为它的效力和在一次反应中同时扩增多个DNA目标的能力。在这项工作中,我们旨在建立多重PCR,并利用血清学和DNA测序方法评估其在GYPA*M, GYPA*N, GYPB*S和GYPB*S等位基因鉴定中的性能。我们还旨在研究这些等位基因与mia相关的杂交糖蛋白(gp)之间的相关性。值得注意的是,多重PCR得到了很好的优化,结果与血清学表型和DNA测序数据一致,具有最高的准确性和可靠性;这证实了我们的研究结果在预测MNSs表型方面的有效性。此外,这项工作首次有力地证明,在泰国供体中,GYPA*M/M和GYPB*s/s基因型与mia相关的杂交gp之间存在适度的相关性。具有GYPA*M/M和GYPB*s/s基因型的个体,预测M + N - s - s +表型,因此最有可能表达Mi(a+)抗原。然而,需要进一步的研究来验证这些结果并阐明潜在的相关性。
Multiplex-PCR technique to predict polymorphic antigens - M, N, S and s - and associations between their alleles and Mia-associated hybrid glycophorins.
Serological typing of MNS polymorphic antigens - M, N, S and s - remains a fundamental technique in transfusion medicine and prenatal care, providing essential information for matching blood donors and recipients and managing haemolytic disease. Although this method is well proven and routinely used, it is not a comprehensive solution, as it has several weaknesses. Alternatively, multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a commonly used genotyping tool due to its potency and ability to amplify several DNA targets simultaneously in a single reaction. In this work, we aimed to develop multiplex PCR and evaluate its performance for GYPA*M, GYPA*N, GYPB*S, and GYPB*s allele identification using serological and DNA sequencing methods. We also aimed to investigate the correlation between these alleles and Mia-associated hybrid glycophorins (GPs). Remarkably, multiplex PCR was well optimised, and the results aligned with serological phenotyping and DNA sequencing data with maximum accuracy and reliability; this confirmed our findings on its validity in predicting MNSs phenotypes. In addition, this work strongly demonstrates, for the first time, a moderate correlation between the GYPA*M/M and GYPB*s/s genotypes and Mia-associated hybrid GPs among Thai donors. Individuals with the GYPA*M/M and GYPB*s/s genotypes, predicted M + N - S- s + phenotypes, will thus most likely to express the Mi(a+) antigen. Nevertheless, further studies are required to validate these results and elucidate the underlying correlations.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.