1型神经纤维瘤病患者的内化和外化症状:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Dan Liu, Liyan Yu, Xian Wu, Julia Moreira, Benjamin Felipe Mujica, Elora Shelly Mukhopadhyay, Angelena Novotney, André B Rietman, Yang Hou
{"title":"1型神经纤维瘤病患者的内化和外化症状:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Dan Liu, Liyan Yu, Xian Wu, Julia Moreira, Benjamin Felipe Mujica, Elora Shelly Mukhopadhyay, Angelena Novotney, André B Rietman, Yang Hou","doi":"10.1186/s13643-024-02749-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) frequently report psychosocial problems, among which internalizing and externalizing symptoms are the most poorly understood due to limited research and inconsistent evidence. This hinders the overall attendance of their psychosocial needs and has a major impact on their quality of life. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize existing findings on the degree to which individuals with NF1 experience internalizing and externalizing symptoms, compared with the unaffected population, and explore moderators of the group disparities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Scopus, PsycINFO, Web of Science, PubMed, and ProQuest were searched from inception to March 26th, 2024, which identified 59 eligible studies (N of NF1 = 3182, mean ages 2.38 to 46.4 years). Hedges' g was calculated for differences in internalizing and externalizing symptoms between the NF1 group and the unaffected controls. Study effect sizes were pooled using robust variance estimation and random-effects models. Moderators of group differences were tested using meta-regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Random-effects meta-analyses indicated that compared with unaffected controls, individuals with NF1 showed more severe depressive (k = 21; g = 0.43; 95% CI [0.21, 0.65]), anxiety (k = 24; g = 0.27; 95% CI [0.01, 0.54]), somatic (k = 27; g = 0.56; 95% CI [0.30, 0.83]), total internalizing (k = 75; g = 0.50; 95% CI [0.33, 0.67]), aggression (k = 33; g = 0.33; 95% CI [0.08, 0.58]), delinquency, (k = 37; g = 0.43; 95% CI [0.26, 0.60]), and total externalizing symptoms (k = 47; g = 0.24; 95% CI [0.13, 0.35]). Studies that included more participants with NF1 who had ADHD or a lower verbal IQ reported greater group disparities in total internalizing symptoms or aggression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings highlight the importance of promptly recognizing internalizing and externalizing symptoms in individuals with NF1 for timely interventions. Future research should identify predictors of internalizing and externalizing symptoms within the NF1 population to inform our knowledge and intervention development. Other implications for future research were also discussed.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>The study protocol of this meta-analysis was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42023478258).</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"14 1","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11752862/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Internalizing and externalizing symptoms in individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Dan Liu, Liyan Yu, Xian Wu, Julia Moreira, Benjamin Felipe Mujica, Elora Shelly Mukhopadhyay, Angelena Novotney, André B Rietman, Yang Hou\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13643-024-02749-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) frequently report psychosocial problems, among which internalizing and externalizing symptoms are the most poorly understood due to limited research and inconsistent evidence. This hinders the overall attendance of their psychosocial needs and has a major impact on their quality of life. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize existing findings on the degree to which individuals with NF1 experience internalizing and externalizing symptoms, compared with the unaffected population, and explore moderators of the group disparities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Scopus, PsycINFO, Web of Science, PubMed, and ProQuest were searched from inception to March 26th, 2024, which identified 59 eligible studies (N of NF1 = 3182, mean ages 2.38 to 46.4 years). Hedges' g was calculated for differences in internalizing and externalizing symptoms between the NF1 group and the unaffected controls. Study effect sizes were pooled using robust variance estimation and random-effects models. Moderators of group differences were tested using meta-regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Random-effects meta-analyses indicated that compared with unaffected controls, individuals with NF1 showed more severe depressive (k = 21; g = 0.43; 95% CI [0.21, 0.65]), anxiety (k = 24; g = 0.27; 95% CI [0.01, 0.54]), somatic (k = 27; g = 0.56; 95% CI [0.30, 0.83]), total internalizing (k = 75; g = 0.50; 95% CI [0.33, 0.67]), aggression (k = 33; g = 0.33; 95% CI [0.08, 0.58]), delinquency, (k = 37; g = 0.43; 95% CI [0.26, 0.60]), and total externalizing symptoms (k = 47; g = 0.24; 95% CI [0.13, 0.35]). Studies that included more participants with NF1 who had ADHD or a lower verbal IQ reported greater group disparities in total internalizing symptoms or aggression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings highlight the importance of promptly recognizing internalizing and externalizing symptoms in individuals with NF1 for timely interventions. Future research should identify predictors of internalizing and externalizing symptoms within the NF1 population to inform our knowledge and intervention development. Other implications for future research were also discussed.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>The study protocol of this meta-analysis was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42023478258).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11752862/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systematic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02749-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02749-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:1型神经纤维瘤病(NF1)患者经常报告社会心理问题,其中内化和外化症状由于研究有限和证据不一致而最不清楚。这妨碍了他们的社会心理需求得到全面满足,并对他们的生活质量产生重大影响。因此,本研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以综合现有的研究结果,与未受影响的人群相比,NF1患者经历内化和外化症状的程度,并探索群体差异的调节因素。方法:检索Scopus、PsycINFO、Web of Science、PubMed、ProQuest等数据库,从建站到2024年3月26日,共纳入59项符合条件的研究(N of NF1 = 3182,平均年龄2.38 ~ 46.4岁)。计算了NF1组和未受影响的对照组在内化和外化症状方面的差异。使用稳健方差估计和随机效应模型汇总研究效应大小。采用元回归对组间差异的调节因子进行检验。结果:随机效应荟萃分析显示,与未受影响的对照组相比,NF1患者表现出更严重的抑郁(k = 21;g = 0.43;95% CI[0.21, 0.65]),焦虑(k = 24;g = 0.27;95% CI[0.01, 0.54]),体细胞(k = 27;g = 0.56;95% CI[0.30, 0.83]),总内化(k = 75;g = 0.50;95% CI[0.33, 0.67]),攻击性(k = 33;g = 0.33;95% CI[0.08, 0.58])、犯罪行为(k = 37;g = 0.43;95% CI[0.26, 0.60])和总外化症状(k = 47;g = 0.24;95% ci[0.13, 0.35])。包括更多患有ADHD或言语智商较低的NF1参与者的研究报告称,在总体内化症状或攻击性方面,群体差异更大。结论:研究结果强调了及时识别NF1患者的内化和外化症状的重要性,以便及时干预。未来的研究应确定NF1人群内化和外化症状的预测因素,以告知我们的知识和干预措施的发展。对未来研究的其他影响也进行了讨论。系统评价注册:本荟萃分析的研究方案在PROSPERO注册(CRD42023478258)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Internalizing and externalizing symptoms in individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) frequently report psychosocial problems, among which internalizing and externalizing symptoms are the most poorly understood due to limited research and inconsistent evidence. This hinders the overall attendance of their psychosocial needs and has a major impact on their quality of life. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize existing findings on the degree to which individuals with NF1 experience internalizing and externalizing symptoms, compared with the unaffected population, and explore moderators of the group disparities.

Methods: Scopus, PsycINFO, Web of Science, PubMed, and ProQuest were searched from inception to March 26th, 2024, which identified 59 eligible studies (N of NF1 = 3182, mean ages 2.38 to 46.4 years). Hedges' g was calculated for differences in internalizing and externalizing symptoms between the NF1 group and the unaffected controls. Study effect sizes were pooled using robust variance estimation and random-effects models. Moderators of group differences were tested using meta-regression.

Results: Random-effects meta-analyses indicated that compared with unaffected controls, individuals with NF1 showed more severe depressive (k = 21; g = 0.43; 95% CI [0.21, 0.65]), anxiety (k = 24; g = 0.27; 95% CI [0.01, 0.54]), somatic (k = 27; g = 0.56; 95% CI [0.30, 0.83]), total internalizing (k = 75; g = 0.50; 95% CI [0.33, 0.67]), aggression (k = 33; g = 0.33; 95% CI [0.08, 0.58]), delinquency, (k = 37; g = 0.43; 95% CI [0.26, 0.60]), and total externalizing symptoms (k = 47; g = 0.24; 95% CI [0.13, 0.35]). Studies that included more participants with NF1 who had ADHD or a lower verbal IQ reported greater group disparities in total internalizing symptoms or aggression.

Conclusions: Findings highlight the importance of promptly recognizing internalizing and externalizing symptoms in individuals with NF1 for timely interventions. Future research should identify predictors of internalizing and externalizing symptoms within the NF1 population to inform our knowledge and intervention development. Other implications for future research were also discussed.

Systematic review registration: The study protocol of this meta-analysis was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42023478258).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信