Jorge M Celis-Moreno, Diogo V Martinho, Manuel J Coelho-E-Silva, Isabel Fragoso, Luís P Ribeiro, Élvio R Gouveia, Tomas Oliveira, João Gonçalves-Santos, Oscar M Tavares, Ricardo R Cayolla, Pedro Duarte-Mendes, Jan M Konarski, Robert M Malina, Gillian K Myburgh, Sean P Cumming, Lauren B Sherar
{"title":"用Greulich-Pyle法评估的骨骼年龄:男性青春期网球运动员的观察者内部和观察者之间的一致性。","authors":"Jorge M Celis-Moreno, Diogo V Martinho, Manuel J Coelho-E-Silva, Isabel Fragoso, Luís P Ribeiro, Élvio R Gouveia, Tomas Oliveira, João Gonçalves-Santos, Oscar M Tavares, Ricardo R Cayolla, Pedro Duarte-Mendes, Jan M Konarski, Robert M Malina, Gillian K Myburgh, Sean P Cumming, Lauren B Sherar","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0307305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The assessment of biological maturation is a central topic in pediatric exercise sciences. Skeletal age (SA) reflects changes in each bone of the hand and wrist from initial ossification to the adult state. This study examined intra-observer and inter-examiner agreement is Greulich-Pyle (GP) assessments of SA in 97 male tennis players 8.6-16.8 years of age. Two observers independently examined all films on two occasions using the GP method. The SA of each bone was evaluated. The mean and median of SAs assigned for each bone was the individual SA for each participant. The calculation was exclusively based on the bones that were not skeletally mature. Intra-observer mean differences were significant for several bones with better results by the experienced examiner (observer B). Comparisons between SA values of the two independent observers indicated significant differences for the ulna, metacarpals II and III, and distal phalanx V. Nevertheless, the magnitude of the bone-specific differences was small, perhaps trivial. Differences in individual SA values of the tennis players based on the non-mature bones of the hand-wrist were negligible based on the mean (0.04±0.39, t = 0.321, p = 0.749) or the median (0.05±0.58, t = 0.007, p = 0.994). Nevertheless, the current study confirmed examiners as a source of error in the estimation of SA using the Greulich-Pyle method and highlighted the importance of calculating SAs based on non-mature bones among adolescent players.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 1","pages":"e0307305"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11753636/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Skeletal age assessed by Greulich-Pyle: Intra-observer and inter-observer agreement among male pubertal tennis players.\",\"authors\":\"Jorge M Celis-Moreno, Diogo V Martinho, Manuel J Coelho-E-Silva, Isabel Fragoso, Luís P Ribeiro, Élvio R Gouveia, Tomas Oliveira, João Gonçalves-Santos, Oscar M Tavares, Ricardo R Cayolla, Pedro Duarte-Mendes, Jan M Konarski, Robert M Malina, Gillian K Myburgh, Sean P Cumming, Lauren B Sherar\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0307305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The assessment of biological maturation is a central topic in pediatric exercise sciences. Skeletal age (SA) reflects changes in each bone of the hand and wrist from initial ossification to the adult state. This study examined intra-observer and inter-examiner agreement is Greulich-Pyle (GP) assessments of SA in 97 male tennis players 8.6-16.8 years of age. Two observers independently examined all films on two occasions using the GP method. The SA of each bone was evaluated. The mean and median of SAs assigned for each bone was the individual SA for each participant. The calculation was exclusively based on the bones that were not skeletally mature. Intra-observer mean differences were significant for several bones with better results by the experienced examiner (observer B). Comparisons between SA values of the two independent observers indicated significant differences for the ulna, metacarpals II and III, and distal phalanx V. Nevertheless, the magnitude of the bone-specific differences was small, perhaps trivial. Differences in individual SA values of the tennis players based on the non-mature bones of the hand-wrist were negligible based on the mean (0.04±0.39, t = 0.321, p = 0.749) or the median (0.05±0.58, t = 0.007, p = 0.994). Nevertheless, the current study confirmed examiners as a source of error in the estimation of SA using the Greulich-Pyle method and highlighted the importance of calculating SAs based on non-mature bones among adolescent players.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"e0307305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11753636/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307305\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0307305","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
生物成熟的评估是儿科运动科学的中心话题。骨骼年龄(SA)反映了手腕骨从初始骨化到成年状态的变化。本研究对97名8.6-16.8岁男子网球运动员进行GP (Greulich-Pyle) SA评估,考察了观察者内部和考官之间的一致性。两名观察员分别在两个场合使用GP方法独立检查了所有薄膜。评估每根骨的SA。分配给每个骨骼的SA的平均值和中位数是每个参与者的个体SA。这个计算完全是基于骨骼发育不成熟的骨头。有经验的检查者(观测者B)对几个骨骼的观察平均值差异显著,结果更好。两个独立观测者的SA值比较表明尺骨、掌骨II和掌骨III以及远端指骨v的SA值差异显著。然而,骨特异性差异的幅度很小,可能微不足道。基于腕部未成熟骨的网球运动员个体SA值的差异从平均值(0.04±0.39,t = 0.321, p = 0.749)和中位数(0.05±0.58,t = 0.007, p = 0.994)来看可以忽略不计。然而,目前的研究证实,在使用Greulich-Pyle方法估计SA时,检查人员是错误的来源,并强调了基于青少年球员的未成熟骨骼计算SA的重要性。
Skeletal age assessed by Greulich-Pyle: Intra-observer and inter-observer agreement among male pubertal tennis players.
The assessment of biological maturation is a central topic in pediatric exercise sciences. Skeletal age (SA) reflects changes in each bone of the hand and wrist from initial ossification to the adult state. This study examined intra-observer and inter-examiner agreement is Greulich-Pyle (GP) assessments of SA in 97 male tennis players 8.6-16.8 years of age. Two observers independently examined all films on two occasions using the GP method. The SA of each bone was evaluated. The mean and median of SAs assigned for each bone was the individual SA for each participant. The calculation was exclusively based on the bones that were not skeletally mature. Intra-observer mean differences were significant for several bones with better results by the experienced examiner (observer B). Comparisons between SA values of the two independent observers indicated significant differences for the ulna, metacarpals II and III, and distal phalanx V. Nevertheless, the magnitude of the bone-specific differences was small, perhaps trivial. Differences in individual SA values of the tennis players based on the non-mature bones of the hand-wrist were negligible based on the mean (0.04±0.39, t = 0.321, p = 0.749) or the median (0.05±0.58, t = 0.007, p = 0.994). Nevertheless, the current study confirmed examiners as a source of error in the estimation of SA using the Greulich-Pyle method and highlighted the importance of calculating SAs based on non-mature bones among adolescent players.
期刊介绍:
PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides:
* Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright
* Fast publication times
* Peer review by expert, practicing researchers
* Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact
* Community-based dialogue on articles
* Worldwide media coverage