Tian Liu , Hanyu Lin , Lingling Zhu , D. Aaron Yang , Huochun Yao , Zihao Pan
{"title":"实时PCR检测实际样本副结核的准确性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Tian Liu , Hanyu Lin , Lingling Zhu , D. Aaron Yang , Huochun Yao , Zihao Pan","doi":"10.1016/j.prevetmed.2025.106436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Paratuberculosis, an infectious and chronic ailment that affects ruminants, causes significant annual economic losses to the livestock industry. Early diagnosis and prompt culling are the primary measures for controlling this disease, highlighting the need for accurate and rapid diagnostic methods. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of quantitative PCR (qPCR) in the diagnosis of paratuberculosis. We searched for and selected articles from databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Elsevier ScienceDirect, Wiley-Blackwell, Springerlink, AGRICOLA, and CAB Abstracts, with VETQUADAS (VQ) employed to assess the quality of the literature. Meta-analysis and heterogeneity investigation were conducted using the “Meta4diag” package in “R” software, Meta-Disc 2.0, and Meta-Disc, while the Deeks’ test was utilized to detect publication bias. The studies included in the systematic review displayed a moderate level of heterogeneity (<em>I²</em> = 48.6 %) with no significant publication bias (<em>p</em> = 0.998). The pooled sensitivity was determined to be 0.92 [95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.85–0.96], and the specificity was 0.85 [95 % CI, 0.77–0.91], with a summary receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (SROCAUC) of 0.95 [95 % CI, 0.91–0.98]. These findings indicate that the qPCR method has high diagnostic value for identifying paratuberculosis in animals. Subgroup analysis revealed satisfactory stability in these studies; however, the current single-target qPCR detection strategy still has limitations, as it fails to simultaneously ensure both sensitivity and specificity. Future developments should focus on multi-target detection strategies to provide more reliable qPCR testing methods for controlling paratuberculosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20413,"journal":{"name":"Preventive veterinary medicine","volume":"237 ","pages":"Article 106436"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of real-time PCR for the detection of paratuberculosis in actual samples: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Tian Liu , Hanyu Lin , Lingling Zhu , D. Aaron Yang , Huochun Yao , Zihao Pan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prevetmed.2025.106436\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Paratuberculosis, an infectious and chronic ailment that affects ruminants, causes significant annual economic losses to the livestock industry. Early diagnosis and prompt culling are the primary measures for controlling this disease, highlighting the need for accurate and rapid diagnostic methods. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of quantitative PCR (qPCR) in the diagnosis of paratuberculosis. We searched for and selected articles from databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Elsevier ScienceDirect, Wiley-Blackwell, Springerlink, AGRICOLA, and CAB Abstracts, with VETQUADAS (VQ) employed to assess the quality of the literature. Meta-analysis and heterogeneity investigation were conducted using the “Meta4diag” package in “R” software, Meta-Disc 2.0, and Meta-Disc, while the Deeks’ test was utilized to detect publication bias. The studies included in the systematic review displayed a moderate level of heterogeneity (<em>I²</em> = 48.6 %) with no significant publication bias (<em>p</em> = 0.998). The pooled sensitivity was determined to be 0.92 [95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.85–0.96], and the specificity was 0.85 [95 % CI, 0.77–0.91], with a summary receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (SROCAUC) of 0.95 [95 % CI, 0.91–0.98]. These findings indicate that the qPCR method has high diagnostic value for identifying paratuberculosis in animals. Subgroup analysis revealed satisfactory stability in these studies; however, the current single-target qPCR detection strategy still has limitations, as it fails to simultaneously ensure both sensitivity and specificity. Future developments should focus on multi-target detection strategies to provide more reliable qPCR testing methods for controlling paratuberculosis.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Preventive veterinary medicine\",\"volume\":\"237 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106436\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Preventive veterinary medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167587725000212\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive veterinary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167587725000212","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Accuracy of real-time PCR for the detection of paratuberculosis in actual samples: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Paratuberculosis, an infectious and chronic ailment that affects ruminants, causes significant annual economic losses to the livestock industry. Early diagnosis and prompt culling are the primary measures for controlling this disease, highlighting the need for accurate and rapid diagnostic methods. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of quantitative PCR (qPCR) in the diagnosis of paratuberculosis. We searched for and selected articles from databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Elsevier ScienceDirect, Wiley-Blackwell, Springerlink, AGRICOLA, and CAB Abstracts, with VETQUADAS (VQ) employed to assess the quality of the literature. Meta-analysis and heterogeneity investigation were conducted using the “Meta4diag” package in “R” software, Meta-Disc 2.0, and Meta-Disc, while the Deeks’ test was utilized to detect publication bias. The studies included in the systematic review displayed a moderate level of heterogeneity (I² = 48.6 %) with no significant publication bias (p = 0.998). The pooled sensitivity was determined to be 0.92 [95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.85–0.96], and the specificity was 0.85 [95 % CI, 0.77–0.91], with a summary receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (SROCAUC) of 0.95 [95 % CI, 0.91–0.98]. These findings indicate that the qPCR method has high diagnostic value for identifying paratuberculosis in animals. Subgroup analysis revealed satisfactory stability in these studies; however, the current single-target qPCR detection strategy still has limitations, as it fails to simultaneously ensure both sensitivity and specificity. Future developments should focus on multi-target detection strategies to provide more reliable qPCR testing methods for controlling paratuberculosis.
期刊介绍:
Preventive Veterinary Medicine is one of the leading international resources for scientific reports on animal health programs and preventive veterinary medicine. The journal follows the guidelines for standardizing and strengthening the reporting of biomedical research which are available from the CONSORT, MOOSE, PRISMA, REFLECT, STARD, and STROBE statements. The journal focuses on:
Epidemiology of health events relevant to domestic and wild animals;
Economic impacts of epidemic and endemic animal and zoonotic diseases;
Latest methods and approaches in veterinary epidemiology;
Disease and infection control or eradication measures;
The "One Health" concept and the relationships between veterinary medicine, human health, animal-production systems, and the environment;
Development of new techniques in surveillance systems and diagnosis;
Evaluation and control of diseases in animal populations.