辅助装置对全无牙上颌数字种植印模精度的影响:一项体内研究。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Keisuke Ashida, Minoru Sanda, Shinpei Tanaka, Kazuyoshi Baba
{"title":"辅助装置对全无牙上颌数字种植印模精度的影响:一项体内研究。","authors":"Keisuke Ashida, Minoru Sanda, Shinpei Tanaka, Kazuyoshi Baba","doi":"10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_24_00261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined the effect of assistive device use on the precision of digital impressions for multiple implants placed in a fully edentulous maxilla in vivo.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of eight participants with fully edentulous maxillae and four implants at position #15, #12, #22, and #25 were included in the study. The assistive device was made using CAD/CAM technology. Digital impressions were obtained using an intraoral scanner with (AD+) and without (AD-) the assistive device that attached to the scan bodies. Each participant underwent five digital and conventional impressions (verification casts (VC)). Dimensional deviations for each impression method were measured using the least-squares best-fit method to assess precision. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's post-hoc adjustments for multiple comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The dimensional deviations were as follows: AD- (37.56 ± 7.43 µm), AD+ (16.23 ± 2.56 µm), and VC (26.48 ± 5.13 µm). One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences between the groups (F = 31.04, P < 0.0001), which remained after Tukey adjustment (P < 0.01). The AD+ group exhibited the highest precision, while the AD- group had the lowest.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For implants placed in a fully edentulous maxilla in vivo, digital impressions with assistive devices demonstrated superior precision compared with those obtained without assistive devices or conventional impressions obtained with an implant indexing device.</p>","PeriodicalId":16887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of prosthodontic research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of assistive devices on the precision of digital implant impressions for fully edentulous maxilla: An in vivo study.\",\"authors\":\"Keisuke Ashida, Minoru Sanda, Shinpei Tanaka, Kazuyoshi Baba\",\"doi\":\"10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_24_00261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examined the effect of assistive device use on the precision of digital impressions for multiple implants placed in a fully edentulous maxilla in vivo.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of eight participants with fully edentulous maxillae and four implants at position #15, #12, #22, and #25 were included in the study. The assistive device was made using CAD/CAM technology. Digital impressions were obtained using an intraoral scanner with (AD+) and without (AD-) the assistive device that attached to the scan bodies. Each participant underwent five digital and conventional impressions (verification casts (VC)). Dimensional deviations for each impression method were measured using the least-squares best-fit method to assess precision. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's post-hoc adjustments for multiple comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The dimensional deviations were as follows: AD- (37.56 ± 7.43 µm), AD+ (16.23 ± 2.56 µm), and VC (26.48 ± 5.13 µm). One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences between the groups (F = 31.04, P < 0.0001), which remained after Tukey adjustment (P < 0.01). The AD+ group exhibited the highest precision, while the AD- group had the lowest.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For implants placed in a fully edentulous maxilla in vivo, digital impressions with assistive devices demonstrated superior precision compared with those obtained without assistive devices or conventional impressions obtained with an implant indexing device.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of prosthodontic research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of prosthodontic research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_24_00261\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of prosthodontic research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_24_00261","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究考察了辅助装置的使用对全无牙上颌多种植体数字印模精度的影响。方法:选取8名上颌全牙无牙者,分别在15、12、22、25位种植4颗牙。采用CAD/CAM技术制作辅助装置。使用口腔内扫描仪(AD+)和不(AD-)附加到扫描体的辅助装置获得数字印象。每个参与者进行了五次数字和传统印象(验证模型(VC))。使用最小二乘最佳拟合方法测量每种印象方法的尺寸偏差以评估精度。统计分析采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey事后调整进行多重比较。结果:尺寸偏差分别为:AD-(37.56±7.43µm)、AD+(16.23±2.56µm)、VC(26.48±5.13µm)。单因素方差分析显示组间差异有统计学意义(F = 31.04, P < 0.0001),经Tukey校正后差异仍有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。AD+组精度最高,AD-组精度最低。结论:对于放置在全无牙上颌骨的种植体,与没有辅助装置或使用种植标引装置获得的传统印模相比,使用辅助装置获得的数字印模具有更高的精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of assistive devices on the precision of digital implant impressions for fully edentulous maxilla: An in vivo study.

Purpose: This study examined the effect of assistive device use on the precision of digital impressions for multiple implants placed in a fully edentulous maxilla in vivo.

Methods: A total of eight participants with fully edentulous maxillae and four implants at position #15, #12, #22, and #25 were included in the study. The assistive device was made using CAD/CAM technology. Digital impressions were obtained using an intraoral scanner with (AD+) and without (AD-) the assistive device that attached to the scan bodies. Each participant underwent five digital and conventional impressions (verification casts (VC)). Dimensional deviations for each impression method were measured using the least-squares best-fit method to assess precision. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's post-hoc adjustments for multiple comparisons.

Results: The dimensional deviations were as follows: AD- (37.56 ± 7.43 µm), AD+ (16.23 ± 2.56 µm), and VC (26.48 ± 5.13 µm). One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences between the groups (F = 31.04, P < 0.0001), which remained after Tukey adjustment (P < 0.01). The AD+ group exhibited the highest precision, while the AD- group had the lowest.

Conclusions: For implants placed in a fully edentulous maxilla in vivo, digital impressions with assistive devices demonstrated superior precision compared with those obtained without assistive devices or conventional impressions obtained with an implant indexing device.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of prosthodontic research
Journal of prosthodontic research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
161
期刊介绍: Journal of Prosthodontic Research is published 4 times annually, in January, April, July, and October, under supervision by the Editorial Board of Japan Prosthodontic Society, which selects all materials submitted for publication. Journal of Prosthodontic Research originated as an official journal of Japan Prosthodontic Society. It has recently developed a long-range plan to become the most prestigious Asian journal of dental research regarding all aspects of oral and occlusal rehabilitation, fixed/removable prosthodontics, oral implantology and applied oral biology and physiology. The Journal will cover all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to reestablish subjective and objective harmonious oral aesthetics and function. The most-targeted topics: 1) Clinical Epidemiology and Prosthodontics 2) Fixed/Removable Prosthodontics 3) Oral Implantology 4) Prosthodontics-Related Biosciences (Regenerative Medicine, Bone Biology, Mechanobiology, Microbiology/Immunology) 5) Oral Physiology and Biomechanics (Masticating and Swallowing Function, Parafunction, e.g., bruxism) 6) Orofacial Pain and Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs) 7) Adhesive Dentistry / Dental Materials / Aesthetic Dentistry 8) Maxillofacial Prosthodontics and Dysphagia Rehabilitation 9) Digital Dentistry Prosthodontic treatment may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, of orofacial trauma, or of a variety of dental and oral diseases and orofacial pain conditions. Reviews, Original articles, technical procedure and case reports can be submitted. Letters to the Editor commenting on papers or any aspect of Journal of Prosthodontic Research are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信