Cariprazine作为治疗重度抑郁症的第一种与后续辅助疗法的医疗资源利用和成本

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Medical Economics Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1080/13696998.2025.2457872
Prakash S Masand, Anita H Clayton, Mousam Parikh, François Laliberté, Guillaume Germain, Malena Mahendran, Cristina Martinez, Nadia Nabulsi
{"title":"Cariprazine作为治疗重度抑郁症的第一种与后续辅助疗法的医疗资源利用和成本","authors":"Prakash S Masand, Anita H Clayton, Mousam Parikh, François Laliberté, Guillaume Germain, Malena Mahendran, Cristina Martinez, Nadia Nabulsi","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2025.2457872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Inadequate response to antidepressant therapy (ADT) is common in major depressive disorder (MDD); atypical antipsychotic (AA) adjunctive therapy may be effective for these patients. This study aimed to compare healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs between patients initiating the AA cariprazine as their first adjunctive therapy vs those initiating cariprazine subsequently.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Merative MarketScan Commercial Database (January 1, 2015, to June 30, 2021) was used to identify US adults with MDD and ≥1 pharmacy claim for cariprazine adjunctive to ADT in 2018 or after. Rates of mental health (MH)‑related and all‑cause HRU per patient-year (PPY) and mean healthcare costs per-patient-per-year (PPPY) were assessed after patients first initiated adjunctive therapy. HRU and costs were compared between cohorts using rate ratios (RRs) and mean cost differences, respectively, estimated from multivariable regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 838 patients receiving cariprazine, 44.7% initiated cariprazine as their first adjunctive therapy to ADT, and 55.3% initiated it subsequently. Those initiating cariprazine first had significantly lower rates of MH‑related hospitalizations (RR [95% confidence interval] = 0.55 [0.30, 0.90], <i>p</i> = .020) and outpatient (OP) visits (0.67 [0.57, 0.82], <i>p</i> < .001) PPY than those initiating cariprazine subsequently. Moreover, patients initiating cariprazine as their first adjunctive therapy had lower annual total MH‑related healthcare costs (mean cost difference [95% confidence interval] -$2,182 [-$4,206, -$69], <i>p</i> = .040), driven primarily by lower OP visit costs (-$1,511 [-$2,330, -$615], <i>p</i> < .001). Similar trends were observed for all-cause HRU and costs.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis of secondary data with limited follow-up. Claims were a proxy for cariprazine use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results from this real‑world study of commercially insured US adults suggest that initiating cariprazine as the first adjunctive therapy rather than a subsequent therapy could help mitigate the considerable economic burden of MDD for appropriate patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"235-244"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Healthcare resource utilization and costs of using cariprazine as the first versus subsequent adjunctive therapy for major depressive disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Prakash S Masand, Anita H Clayton, Mousam Parikh, François Laliberté, Guillaume Germain, Malena Mahendran, Cristina Martinez, Nadia Nabulsi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13696998.2025.2457872\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Inadequate response to antidepressant therapy (ADT) is common in major depressive disorder (MDD); atypical antipsychotic (AA) adjunctive therapy may be effective for these patients. This study aimed to compare healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs between patients initiating the AA cariprazine as their first adjunctive therapy vs those initiating cariprazine subsequently.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Merative MarketScan Commercial Database (January 1, 2015, to June 30, 2021) was used to identify US adults with MDD and ≥1 pharmacy claim for cariprazine adjunctive to ADT in 2018 or after. Rates of mental health (MH)‑related and all‑cause HRU per patient-year (PPY) and mean healthcare costs per-patient-per-year (PPPY) were assessed after patients first initiated adjunctive therapy. HRU and costs were compared between cohorts using rate ratios (RRs) and mean cost differences, respectively, estimated from multivariable regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 838 patients receiving cariprazine, 44.7% initiated cariprazine as their first adjunctive therapy to ADT, and 55.3% initiated it subsequently. Those initiating cariprazine first had significantly lower rates of MH‑related hospitalizations (RR [95% confidence interval] = 0.55 [0.30, 0.90], <i>p</i> = .020) and outpatient (OP) visits (0.67 [0.57, 0.82], <i>p</i> < .001) PPY than those initiating cariprazine subsequently. Moreover, patients initiating cariprazine as their first adjunctive therapy had lower annual total MH‑related healthcare costs (mean cost difference [95% confidence interval] -$2,182 [-$4,206, -$69], <i>p</i> = .040), driven primarily by lower OP visit costs (-$1,511 [-$2,330, -$615], <i>p</i> < .001). Similar trends were observed for all-cause HRU and costs.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis of secondary data with limited follow-up. Claims were a proxy for cariprazine use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results from this real‑world study of commercially insured US adults suggest that initiating cariprazine as the first adjunctive therapy rather than a subsequent therapy could help mitigate the considerable economic burden of MDD for appropriate patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"235-244\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2457872\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2457872","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对抗抑郁药物治疗(ADT)反应不足在重度抑郁症(MDD)中很常见;非典型抗精神病药(AA)辅助治疗可能对这些患者有效。本研究旨在比较首次使用AA卡立哌嗪和随后使用卡立哌嗪的患者的医疗资源利用率和成本。方法:使用MerativeTM MarketScan®商业数据库(2015年1月1日至2021年6月30日)来识别2018年或之后患有重度抑郁症和卡吡嗪辅助ADT≥1药房索赔的美国成年人。在患者首次开始辅助治疗后,评估了每位患者每年的精神健康相关率(MH)和全因HRU (PPY)以及每位患者每年的平均医疗费用(PPPY)。分别使用多变量回归模型估计的比率比(rr)和平均成本差异比较各组间的HRU和成本。结果:在838例接受卡吡嗪治疗的患者中,44.7%的患者首次使用卡吡嗪作为ADT的辅助治疗,55.3%的患者随后开始使用卡吡嗪。首先使用卡吡嗪的患者与MH相关的住院率(RR[95%可信区间]= 0.55 [0.30,0.90],P = 0.020)和门诊(OP)就诊率(0.67 [0.57,0.82],P = 0.040)显著降低,主要原因是OP就诊费用较低(- 1511美元[- 2330美元,- 615美元],P < 0.05)。索赔是卡吡嗪使用的代表。结论:这项对商业保险的美国成年人的真实世界研究的结果表明,将卡吡嗪作为第一种辅助治疗,而不是随后的治疗,可以帮助减轻适当的重度抑郁症患者可观的经济负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Healthcare resource utilization and costs of using cariprazine as the first versus subsequent adjunctive therapy for major depressive disorder.

Aim: Inadequate response to antidepressant therapy (ADT) is common in major depressive disorder (MDD); atypical antipsychotic (AA) adjunctive therapy may be effective for these patients. This study aimed to compare healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs between patients initiating the AA cariprazine as their first adjunctive therapy vs those initiating cariprazine subsequently.

Methods: The Merative MarketScan Commercial Database (January 1, 2015, to June 30, 2021) was used to identify US adults with MDD and ≥1 pharmacy claim for cariprazine adjunctive to ADT in 2018 or after. Rates of mental health (MH)‑related and all‑cause HRU per patient-year (PPY) and mean healthcare costs per-patient-per-year (PPPY) were assessed after patients first initiated adjunctive therapy. HRU and costs were compared between cohorts using rate ratios (RRs) and mean cost differences, respectively, estimated from multivariable regression models.

Results: Of 838 patients receiving cariprazine, 44.7% initiated cariprazine as their first adjunctive therapy to ADT, and 55.3% initiated it subsequently. Those initiating cariprazine first had significantly lower rates of MH‑related hospitalizations (RR [95% confidence interval] = 0.55 [0.30, 0.90], p = .020) and outpatient (OP) visits (0.67 [0.57, 0.82], p < .001) PPY than those initiating cariprazine subsequently. Moreover, patients initiating cariprazine as their first adjunctive therapy had lower annual total MH‑related healthcare costs (mean cost difference [95% confidence interval] -$2,182 [-$4,206, -$69], p = .040), driven primarily by lower OP visit costs (-$1,511 [-$2,330, -$615], p < .001). Similar trends were observed for all-cause HRU and costs.

Limitations: This was a retrospective analysis of secondary data with limited follow-up. Claims were a proxy for cariprazine use.

Conclusions: Results from this real‑world study of commercially insured US adults suggest that initiating cariprazine as the first adjunctive therapy rather than a subsequent therapy could help mitigate the considerable economic burden of MDD for appropriate patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Economics
Journal of Medical Economics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication. Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信