{"title":"准分子激光冠状动脉粥样硬化切除术治疗st段抬高型心肌梗死:来自多中心注册的见解。","authors":"Yuji Matsuda, Taishi Yonetsu, Ken Kurihara, Shigeo Shimizu, Daisuke Ueshima, Hiroshi Inagaki, Yuko Onishi, Kaoru Sakurai, Takaaki Tsuchiyama, Takashi Ashikaga, Hiroyuki Fujii, Kazuo Kobayashi, Ikhtiyorjon Khamdamov, Yoshinori Kanno, Takayuki Niida, Yosuke Yamakami, Tomoyo Sugiyama, Tomoyuki Umemoto, Tsunekazu Kakuta, Tetsuo Sasano","doi":"10.1016/j.jjcc.2025.01.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Excimer laser coronary atherectomy (ELCA) is used for thrombotic culprit lesions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but its effectiveness is still unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention within 24 h of onset were retrospectively investigated. Patients were divided into ELCA and non-ELCA groups. The primary endpoint was target vessel-related major adverse cardiac events (TV-MACE). Cox regression analysis and propensity score matching were performed to compare clinical outcomes between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2593 patients were included in the analysis, with a median follow-up of 815 (390-1385) days. In the total cohort, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of TV-MACE-free survival rate. ELCA use was not a significant determinant of TV-MACE (hazard ratio 1.265, 95 % confidence interval, 0.910-1.757; p = 0.161). Nevertheless, when the ELCA group was stratified by the ELCA catheter size, the large catheter (1.4 mm-1.7 mm) group showed a lower event rate compared to the others in univariate analysis, although this difference was not significant in multivariate analysis. In the propensity score-matched cohort of 736 patients (368 pairs), the TV-MACE-free survival did not differ between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ELCA use was not associated with a reduced rate of adverse cardiac events in patients with STEMI. However, the use of large-sized ELCA catheters showed a potential association with better clinical outcomes, warranting further prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Excimer LASER coronary atherectomy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Insights from a multicenter registry.\",\"authors\":\"Yuji Matsuda, Taishi Yonetsu, Ken Kurihara, Shigeo Shimizu, Daisuke Ueshima, Hiroshi Inagaki, Yuko Onishi, Kaoru Sakurai, Takaaki Tsuchiyama, Takashi Ashikaga, Hiroyuki Fujii, Kazuo Kobayashi, Ikhtiyorjon Khamdamov, Yoshinori Kanno, Takayuki Niida, Yosuke Yamakami, Tomoyo Sugiyama, Tomoyuki Umemoto, Tsunekazu Kakuta, Tetsuo Sasano\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jjcc.2025.01.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Excimer laser coronary atherectomy (ELCA) is used for thrombotic culprit lesions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but its effectiveness is still unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention within 24 h of onset were retrospectively investigated. Patients were divided into ELCA and non-ELCA groups. The primary endpoint was target vessel-related major adverse cardiac events (TV-MACE). Cox regression analysis and propensity score matching were performed to compare clinical outcomes between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2593 patients were included in the analysis, with a median follow-up of 815 (390-1385) days. In the total cohort, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of TV-MACE-free survival rate. ELCA use was not a significant determinant of TV-MACE (hazard ratio 1.265, 95 % confidence interval, 0.910-1.757; p = 0.161). Nevertheless, when the ELCA group was stratified by the ELCA catheter size, the large catheter (1.4 mm-1.7 mm) group showed a lower event rate compared to the others in univariate analysis, although this difference was not significant in multivariate analysis. In the propensity score-matched cohort of 736 patients (368 pairs), the TV-MACE-free survival did not differ between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ELCA use was not associated with a reduced rate of adverse cardiac events in patients with STEMI. However, the use of large-sized ELCA catheters showed a potential association with better clinical outcomes, warranting further prospective studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2025.01.008\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2025.01.008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Excimer LASER coronary atherectomy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Insights from a multicenter registry.
Background: Excimer laser coronary atherectomy (ELCA) is used for thrombotic culprit lesions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but its effectiveness is still unclear.
Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention within 24 h of onset were retrospectively investigated. Patients were divided into ELCA and non-ELCA groups. The primary endpoint was target vessel-related major adverse cardiac events (TV-MACE). Cox regression analysis and propensity score matching were performed to compare clinical outcomes between the two groups.
Results: A total of 2593 patients were included in the analysis, with a median follow-up of 815 (390-1385) days. In the total cohort, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of TV-MACE-free survival rate. ELCA use was not a significant determinant of TV-MACE (hazard ratio 1.265, 95 % confidence interval, 0.910-1.757; p = 0.161). Nevertheless, when the ELCA group was stratified by the ELCA catheter size, the large catheter (1.4 mm-1.7 mm) group showed a lower event rate compared to the others in univariate analysis, although this difference was not significant in multivariate analysis. In the propensity score-matched cohort of 736 patients (368 pairs), the TV-MACE-free survival did not differ between the two groups.
Conclusions: ELCA use was not associated with a reduced rate of adverse cardiac events in patients with STEMI. However, the use of large-sized ELCA catheters showed a potential association with better clinical outcomes, warranting further prospective studies.
期刊介绍:
The official journal of the Japanese College of Cardiology is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal publishing the latest findings in cardiovascular medicine. Journal of Cardiology (JC) aims to publish the highest-quality material covering original basic and clinical research on all aspects of cardiovascular disease. Topics covered include ischemic heart disease, cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease, vascular disease, hypertension, arrhythmia, congenital heart disease, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment, new diagnostic techniques, and cardiovascular imaging. JC also publishes a selection of review articles, clinical trials, short communications, and important messages and letters to the editor.