利用正球差的非球面单焦点人工晶状体的视觉结果、对比敏感度和离焦剖面。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Elizabeth M Law, Rajesh K Aggarwal, Phillip J Buckhurst
{"title":"利用正球差的非球面单焦点人工晶状体的视觉结果、对比敏感度和离焦剖面。","authors":"Elizabeth M Law, Rajesh K Aggarwal, Phillip J Buckhurst","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of the RayOne EMV intraocular lens with targeted micromonovision.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Southend Private Hospital, Westcliff on Sea, United Kingdom.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>50 patients (100 eyes) were assessed at 12 to 18 months postoperatively. Emmetropia was targeted in the dominant eye and myopia of -0.50 to -1.00 diopter (D) in the nondominant eye. Uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity was assessed monocularly and binocularly at distance (6 m), intermediate (70 cm), and near (40 cm). Defocus was assessed from +1.50 to -4.00 D monocularly and binocularly. Contrast sensitivity was assessed using a computerized Pelli-Robson chart.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean spherical equivalent was -0.05 ± 0.34 D and -0.91 ± 0.60 D in the dominant and nondominant eyes, respectively. UDVA was significantly different in the dominant (0.09 ± 0.10 logMAR) and nondominant (0.31 ± 0.18 logMAR) eyes ( P < .01). CDVA, distance corrected intermediate VA (DCIVA), and distance corrected near VA (DCNVA) were similar between eyes. However, significant differences were found between binocular uncorrected intermediate VA (UIVA) (0.16 ± 0.11 logMAR) and DCIVA (0.31 ± 0.11 logMAR) ( P < .01) and between binocular uncorrected near VA (UNVA) (0.30 ± 0.17 logMAR) and DCNVA (0.50 ± 0.19 logMAR) also ( P < .01). The nondominant eye shows superior acuity eye in both UIVA ( P < .01) and UNVA ( P < .01). Contrast sensitivity showed no significant difference between eyes ( P = .06). Significant improvement binocularly compared with monocularly was seen through imposed defocus -0.50 to -2.50 D.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The RayOne EMV with micromonovision is a reliable method for improving intermediate and near VA, by increasing the range of focus without compromise of distance acuity or contrast sensitivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"394-398"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visual outcomes, contrast sensitivity, and defocus profile with an aspheric monofocal intraocular lens using positive spherical aberration.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth M Law, Rajesh K Aggarwal, Phillip J Buckhurst\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of the RayOne EMV intraocular lens with targeted micromonovision.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Southend Private Hospital, Westcliff on Sea, United Kingdom.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>50 patients (100 eyes) were assessed at 12 to 18 months postoperatively. Emmetropia was targeted in the dominant eye and myopia of -0.50 to -1.00 diopter (D) in the nondominant eye. Uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity was assessed monocularly and binocularly at distance (6 m), intermediate (70 cm), and near (40 cm). Defocus was assessed from +1.50 to -4.00 D monocularly and binocularly. Contrast sensitivity was assessed using a computerized Pelli-Robson chart.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean spherical equivalent was -0.05 ± 0.34 D and -0.91 ± 0.60 D in the dominant and nondominant eyes, respectively. UDVA was significantly different in the dominant (0.09 ± 0.10 logMAR) and nondominant (0.31 ± 0.18 logMAR) eyes ( P < .01). CDVA, distance corrected intermediate VA (DCIVA), and distance corrected near VA (DCNVA) were similar between eyes. However, significant differences were found between binocular uncorrected intermediate VA (UIVA) (0.16 ± 0.11 logMAR) and DCIVA (0.31 ± 0.11 logMAR) ( P < .01) and between binocular uncorrected near VA (UNVA) (0.30 ± 0.17 logMAR) and DCNVA (0.50 ± 0.19 logMAR) also ( P < .01). The nondominant eye shows superior acuity eye in both UIVA ( P < .01) and UNVA ( P < .01). Contrast sensitivity showed no significant difference between eyes ( P = .06). Significant improvement binocularly compared with monocularly was seen through imposed defocus -0.50 to -2.50 D.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The RayOne EMV with micromonovision is a reliable method for improving intermediate and near VA, by increasing the range of focus without compromise of distance acuity or contrast sensitivity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"394-398\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001612\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001612","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价双侧RayOne EMV人工晶状体植入术后的视力效果。地点:英国绍森德私立医院。设计:回顾性队列。方法:50例(100只眼)术后12 ~ 18个月进行评估。以优势眼近视为目标,非优势眼近视为-0.50 ~ -1.00D。分别在距离(6m)、中间(70cm)和近距离(40cm)进行单眼和双眼矫正视力评估。散焦在+1.50D至-4.00D范围内进行单目和双目评估。对比敏感度采用计算机化的Pelli-Robson图进行评估。结果:优势眼和非优势眼的平均球面等效度(MSE)分别为-0.05±0.34D和-0.91±0.60D。优势眼和非优势眼的未矫正距离视力(UDVA)差异有统计学意义(0.08±0.10LogMAR)和0.29±0.17LogMAR。结论:RayOne微单视EMV在不影响距离和对比敏感度的情况下,增加了聚焦范围,是一种提高中、近视力的可靠方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Visual outcomes, contrast sensitivity, and defocus profile with an aspheric monofocal intraocular lens using positive spherical aberration.

Purpose: To evaluate visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of the RayOne EMV intraocular lens with targeted micromonovision.

Setting: Southend Private Hospital, Westcliff on Sea, United Kingdom.

Design: Retrospective cohort.

Methods: 50 patients (100 eyes) were assessed at 12 to 18 months postoperatively. Emmetropia was targeted in the dominant eye and myopia of -0.50 to -1.00 diopter (D) in the nondominant eye. Uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity was assessed monocularly and binocularly at distance (6 m), intermediate (70 cm), and near (40 cm). Defocus was assessed from +1.50 to -4.00 D monocularly and binocularly. Contrast sensitivity was assessed using a computerized Pelli-Robson chart.

Results: Mean spherical equivalent was -0.05 ± 0.34 D and -0.91 ± 0.60 D in the dominant and nondominant eyes, respectively. UDVA was significantly different in the dominant (0.09 ± 0.10 logMAR) and nondominant (0.31 ± 0.18 logMAR) eyes ( P < .01). CDVA, distance corrected intermediate VA (DCIVA), and distance corrected near VA (DCNVA) were similar between eyes. However, significant differences were found between binocular uncorrected intermediate VA (UIVA) (0.16 ± 0.11 logMAR) and DCIVA (0.31 ± 0.11 logMAR) ( P < .01) and between binocular uncorrected near VA (UNVA) (0.30 ± 0.17 logMAR) and DCNVA (0.50 ± 0.19 logMAR) also ( P < .01). The nondominant eye shows superior acuity eye in both UIVA ( P < .01) and UNVA ( P < .01). Contrast sensitivity showed no significant difference between eyes ( P = .06). Significant improvement binocularly compared with monocularly was seen through imposed defocus -0.50 to -2.50 D.

Conclusions: The RayOne EMV with micromonovision is a reliable method for improving intermediate and near VA, by increasing the range of focus without compromise of distance acuity or contrast sensitivity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信