暴露的手指增加负重和改变绷带下压力的狗与前肢夹板。

IF 1.6 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Sarah J Stark, Y Lucia Meester, Richard Evans, Wanda Gordon-Evans
{"title":"暴露的手指增加负重和改变绷带下压力的狗与前肢夹板。","authors":"Sarah J Stark, Y Lucia Meester, Richard Evans, Wanda Gordon-Evans","doi":"10.2460/javma.24.10.0684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goal of this study was to evaluate the difference in weight bearing in a toes-in splint versus a toes-out forelimb splint and to determine the difference in sub-bandage pressures between the groups. We hypothesized that (1) weight bearing would not be different between the 2 splints and that (2) sub-bandage pressures would be distributed higher on the distal digits in the toes-out splint and pressures would be more evenly distributed across the paw in the toes-in splint.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this controlled crossover trial, a random forelimb of 10 healthy dogs was bandaged with a splint that left the digits exposed and again with a splint that encompassed the digits. The ground reaction forces and the difference in sub-bandage pressures between 2 sensor sections were compared between the toes-in and toes-out bandages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (SD) of peak vertical force was 26.76% (11.86%) for the toes-in bandage and 49.85% (9.21%) for the toes-out bandage. The mean (SD) sub-bandage pressure differences between sections were -121.28 (138.28) mm Hg and 130.32 (116.40) for toes-in and toes-out bandages, respectively (P = .001). This remained significant even after weight bearing was removed as a factor (P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Leaving the distal aspect of digits 3 and 4 exposed by a splint results in better weight bearing, but also creates a sub-bandage pressure increase on the toes relative to the rest of the paw.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>These results suggest that splint placement should be adjusted based on the needs of each patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":14658,"journal":{"name":"Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"635-639"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exposed digits increase weight bearing and alter sub-bandage pressures in dogs with forelimb splints.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah J Stark, Y Lucia Meester, Richard Evans, Wanda Gordon-Evans\",\"doi\":\"10.2460/javma.24.10.0684\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goal of this study was to evaluate the difference in weight bearing in a toes-in splint versus a toes-out forelimb splint and to determine the difference in sub-bandage pressures between the groups. We hypothesized that (1) weight bearing would not be different between the 2 splints and that (2) sub-bandage pressures would be distributed higher on the distal digits in the toes-out splint and pressures would be more evenly distributed across the paw in the toes-in splint.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this controlled crossover trial, a random forelimb of 10 healthy dogs was bandaged with a splint that left the digits exposed and again with a splint that encompassed the digits. The ground reaction forces and the difference in sub-bandage pressures between 2 sensor sections were compared between the toes-in and toes-out bandages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (SD) of peak vertical force was 26.76% (11.86%) for the toes-in bandage and 49.85% (9.21%) for the toes-out bandage. The mean (SD) sub-bandage pressure differences between sections were -121.28 (138.28) mm Hg and 130.32 (116.40) for toes-in and toes-out bandages, respectively (P = .001). This remained significant even after weight bearing was removed as a factor (P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Leaving the distal aspect of digits 3 and 4 exposed by a splint results in better weight bearing, but also creates a sub-bandage pressure increase on the toes relative to the rest of the paw.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>These results suggest that splint placement should be adjusted based on the needs of each patient.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14658,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"635-639\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.24.10.0684\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.24.10.0684","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估脚趾内夹板与脚趾外夹板在前肢负重方面的差异,并确定两组之间绷带下压力的差异。我们假设:(1)两种夹板之间的负重不会有差异;(2)在脚趾外夹板中,远端手指的绷带下压力分布更高,而在脚趾内夹板中,压力分布更均匀。方法:在这个对照交叉试验中,随机选取10只健康狗的前肢,用夹板包扎,使手指暴露,再用夹板包裹手指。比较了趾内和趾外绷带的地面反作用力和2个传感器段绷带下压力的差异。结果:趾内和趾外绷带的峰值垂直力均值分别为26.76%(11.86%)和49.85%(9.21%)。趾内和趾外绷带各切片之间的平均(SD)绷带下压差分别为-121.28 (138.28)mm Hg和130.32 (116.40)(P = .001)。即使将体重作为一个因素剔除后,这一结果仍然显著(P < 0.001)。结论:用夹板暴露手指3和4的远端可以更好地承重,但也会使脚趾相对于爪的其他部分产生绷带下的压力增加。临床相关性:这些结果提示夹板的放置应根据每位患者的需要进行调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exposed digits increase weight bearing and alter sub-bandage pressures in dogs with forelimb splints.

Objective: The goal of this study was to evaluate the difference in weight bearing in a toes-in splint versus a toes-out forelimb splint and to determine the difference in sub-bandage pressures between the groups. We hypothesized that (1) weight bearing would not be different between the 2 splints and that (2) sub-bandage pressures would be distributed higher on the distal digits in the toes-out splint and pressures would be more evenly distributed across the paw in the toes-in splint.

Methods: In this controlled crossover trial, a random forelimb of 10 healthy dogs was bandaged with a splint that left the digits exposed and again with a splint that encompassed the digits. The ground reaction forces and the difference in sub-bandage pressures between 2 sensor sections were compared between the toes-in and toes-out bandages.

Results: The mean (SD) of peak vertical force was 26.76% (11.86%) for the toes-in bandage and 49.85% (9.21%) for the toes-out bandage. The mean (SD) sub-bandage pressure differences between sections were -121.28 (138.28) mm Hg and 130.32 (116.40) for toes-in and toes-out bandages, respectively (P = .001). This remained significant even after weight bearing was removed as a factor (P < .001).

Conclusions: Leaving the distal aspect of digits 3 and 4 exposed by a splint results in better weight bearing, but also creates a sub-bandage pressure increase on the toes relative to the rest of the paw.

Clinical relevance: These results suggest that splint placement should be adjusted based on the needs of each patient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
15.80%
发文量
539
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Published twice monthly, this peer-reviewed, general scientific journal provides reports of clinical research, feature articles and regular columns of interest to veterinarians in private and public practice. The News and Classified Ad sections are posted online 10 days to two weeks before they are delivered in print.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信