低强度激光针刺和微电流电刺激对儿童牙印模时呕吐反射的影响:一项随机对照临床试验。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Sara Salah, Saswan Hafez, Marwa Baraka
{"title":"低强度激光针刺和微电流电刺激对儿童牙印模时呕吐反射的影响:一项随机对照临床试验。","authors":"Sara Salah, Saswan Hafez, Marwa Baraka","doi":"10.1111/ipd.13296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dental impressions are crucial in pediatric dentistry, but exaggerated gagging can obstruct this process. Various methods have been proposed to manage the gag reflex (GR).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of laser acupuncture and electroacupuncture in controlling children's GR.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A three-armed randomized controlled trial was conducted with 63 patients aged 6-9, with excessive GR, scheduled for dental impressions. Participants were assigned to one of three groups: low-level laser (n = 21), microcurrent stimulation with a Meridian pen (n = 21), and a control group with a deactivated pen (n = 21). Gag preventive index (GPI) was taken, and dental anxiety was assessed using the Facial Image Scale (FIS), pulse rate (PR), and blood oxygen saturation (SaO<sub>2</sub>). Significance was set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All interventions influenced GPI scores. The Meridian pen and laser groups achieved better GPI scores (p < 0.001) than the control group. FIS scores between the Meridian pen and laser groups were comparable, differing significantly from the control group (p < 0.001). The Meridian pen and laser groups showed greater reductions in PR (p < 0.001) and higher SaO<sub>2</sub> post-intervention (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Meridian pen and laser outperformed the control group, demonstrating effectiveness in enhancing physiological and subjective measures.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06422286.</p>","PeriodicalId":14268,"journal":{"name":"International journal of paediatric dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Low-Level Laser Acupuncture and Microcurrent Electrical Stimulation on Gag Reflex in Children During Dental Impression: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sara Salah, Saswan Hafez, Marwa Baraka\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ipd.13296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dental impressions are crucial in pediatric dentistry, but exaggerated gagging can obstruct this process. Various methods have been proposed to manage the gag reflex (GR).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of laser acupuncture and electroacupuncture in controlling children's GR.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A three-armed randomized controlled trial was conducted with 63 patients aged 6-9, with excessive GR, scheduled for dental impressions. Participants were assigned to one of three groups: low-level laser (n = 21), microcurrent stimulation with a Meridian pen (n = 21), and a control group with a deactivated pen (n = 21). Gag preventive index (GPI) was taken, and dental anxiety was assessed using the Facial Image Scale (FIS), pulse rate (PR), and blood oxygen saturation (SaO<sub>2</sub>). Significance was set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All interventions influenced GPI scores. The Meridian pen and laser groups achieved better GPI scores (p < 0.001) than the control group. FIS scores between the Meridian pen and laser groups were comparable, differing significantly from the control group (p < 0.001). The Meridian pen and laser groups showed greater reductions in PR (p < 0.001) and higher SaO<sub>2</sub> post-intervention (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Meridian pen and laser outperformed the control group, demonstrating effectiveness in enhancing physiological and subjective measures.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06422286.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of paediatric dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of paediatric dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.13296\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of paediatric dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.13296","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:牙印在儿童牙科中是至关重要的,但夸张的呕吐会阻碍这一过程。人们提出了各种方法来控制呕吐反射(GR)。目的:评价和比较激光针刺与电针治疗小儿GR的疗效。设计:采用三臂随机对照试验,对63例6-9岁GR过高的患者进行牙印模治疗。参与者被分配到三组中的一组:低水平激光(n = 21),用经络笔进行微电流刺激(n = 21),和使用未激活笔的对照组(n = 21)。采用面部图像量表(FIS)、脉搏率(PR)、血氧饱和度(SaO2)评估牙齿焦虑。结果:所有干预措施均影响GPI评分。经络笔组和激光组在干预后GPI评分(p)高于对照组(p)。结论:经络笔组和激光组在增强生理和主观指标方面均优于对照组。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT06422286。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Low-Level Laser Acupuncture and Microcurrent Electrical Stimulation on Gag Reflex in Children During Dental Impression: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Background: Dental impressions are crucial in pediatric dentistry, but exaggerated gagging can obstruct this process. Various methods have been proposed to manage the gag reflex (GR).

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of laser acupuncture and electroacupuncture in controlling children's GR.

Design: A three-armed randomized controlled trial was conducted with 63 patients aged 6-9, with excessive GR, scheduled for dental impressions. Participants were assigned to one of three groups: low-level laser (n = 21), microcurrent stimulation with a Meridian pen (n = 21), and a control group with a deactivated pen (n = 21). Gag preventive index (GPI) was taken, and dental anxiety was assessed using the Facial Image Scale (FIS), pulse rate (PR), and blood oxygen saturation (SaO2). Significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results: All interventions influenced GPI scores. The Meridian pen and laser groups achieved better GPI scores (p < 0.001) than the control group. FIS scores between the Meridian pen and laser groups were comparable, differing significantly from the control group (p < 0.001). The Meridian pen and laser groups showed greater reductions in PR (p < 0.001) and higher SaO2 post-intervention (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The Meridian pen and laser outperformed the control group, demonstrating effectiveness in enhancing physiological and subjective measures.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06422286.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry was formed in 1991 by the merger of the Journals of the International Association of Paediatric Dentistry and the British Society of Paediatric Dentistry and is published bi-monthly. It has true international scope and aims to promote the highest standard of education, practice and research in paediatric dentistry world-wide. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry publishes papers on all aspects of paediatric dentistry including: growth and development, behaviour management, diagnosis, prevention, restorative treatment and issue relating to medically compromised children or those with disabilities. This peer-reviewed journal features scientific articles, reviews, case reports, clinical techniques, short communications and abstracts of current paediatric dental research. Analytical studies with a scientific novelty value are preferred to descriptive studies. Case reports illustrating unusual conditions and clinically relevant observations are acceptable but must be of sufficiently high quality to be considered for publication; particularly the illustrative material must be of the highest quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信