在胎儿功能磁共振成像中测量运动腐败的影响。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Athena Taymourtash, Ernst Schwartz, Karl-Heinz Nenning, Roxane Licandro, Patric Kienast, Veronika Hielle, Daniela Prayer, Gregor Kasprian, Georg Langs
{"title":"在胎儿功能磁共振成像中测量运动腐败的影响。","authors":"Athena Taymourtash,&nbsp;Ernst Schwartz,&nbsp;Karl-Heinz Nenning,&nbsp;Roxane Licandro,&nbsp;Patric Kienast,&nbsp;Veronika Hielle,&nbsp;Daniela Prayer,&nbsp;Gregor Kasprian,&nbsp;Georg Langs","doi":"10.1002/hbm.26806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Irregular and unpredictable fetal movement is the most common cause of artifacts in in utero functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), affecting analysis and limiting our understanding of early functional brain development. The accurate detection of corrupted functional connectivity (FC) resulting from motion artifacts or preprocessing, instead of neural activity, is a prerequisite for reliable and valid analysis of FC and early brain development. Approaches to address this problem in adult data are of limited utility in fetal fMRI. In this study, we evaluate a novel technique for robust computational assessment of motion artifacts, and the quantitative comparison of regression models for artifact removal in fetal FC analysis. It exploits the association between dynamic FC and non-stationarity of fetal movement, to detect residual noise. To validate our motion artifact detection technique in detail, we used a parametric generative model for neural events and fMRI blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal. We conducted a systematic evaluation of 11 commonly used regression models in a sample of 70 fetuses with gestational age of 19–39 weeks. Results demonstrate that the proposed method has better accuracy in identifying corrupted FC compared to methods designed for adults. The technique, suggests that censoring, global signal regression and anatomical component-based regression models are the most effective models for compensating motion. The benchmarking technique, and the generative model for realistic fetal fMRI BOLD enables investigators conducting in utero fMRI analysis to effectively quantify the impact of fetal motion and evaluate alternative regression strategies for mitigating this impact. The code is publicly available at: https://github.com/cirmuw/fetalfMRIproc.</p>","PeriodicalId":13019,"journal":{"name":"Human Brain Mapping","volume":"46 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755121/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring the effects of motion corruption in fetal fMRI\",\"authors\":\"Athena Taymourtash,&nbsp;Ernst Schwartz,&nbsp;Karl-Heinz Nenning,&nbsp;Roxane Licandro,&nbsp;Patric Kienast,&nbsp;Veronika Hielle,&nbsp;Daniela Prayer,&nbsp;Gregor Kasprian,&nbsp;Georg Langs\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hbm.26806\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Irregular and unpredictable fetal movement is the most common cause of artifacts in in utero functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), affecting analysis and limiting our understanding of early functional brain development. The accurate detection of corrupted functional connectivity (FC) resulting from motion artifacts or preprocessing, instead of neural activity, is a prerequisite for reliable and valid analysis of FC and early brain development. Approaches to address this problem in adult data are of limited utility in fetal fMRI. In this study, we evaluate a novel technique for robust computational assessment of motion artifacts, and the quantitative comparison of regression models for artifact removal in fetal FC analysis. It exploits the association between dynamic FC and non-stationarity of fetal movement, to detect residual noise. To validate our motion artifact detection technique in detail, we used a parametric generative model for neural events and fMRI blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal. We conducted a systematic evaluation of 11 commonly used regression models in a sample of 70 fetuses with gestational age of 19–39 weeks. Results demonstrate that the proposed method has better accuracy in identifying corrupted FC compared to methods designed for adults. The technique, suggests that censoring, global signal regression and anatomical component-based regression models are the most effective models for compensating motion. The benchmarking technique, and the generative model for realistic fetal fMRI BOLD enables investigators conducting in utero fMRI analysis to effectively quantify the impact of fetal motion and evaluate alternative regression strategies for mitigating this impact. The code is publicly available at: https://github.com/cirmuw/fetalfMRIproc.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Brain Mapping\",\"volume\":\"46 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755121/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Brain Mapping\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.26806\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Brain Mapping","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.26806","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不规则和不可预测的胎儿运动是子宫内功能磁共振成像(fMRI)中伪影最常见的原因,影响分析并限制了我们对早期功能脑发育的理解。准确检测由运动伪影或预处理而不是神经活动引起的功能连接损坏(FC)是可靠和有效分析FC和早期大脑发育的先决条件。在成人数据中解决这一问题的方法在胎儿功能磁共振成像中应用有限。在这项研究中,我们评估了一种新的运动伪影的鲁棒计算评估技术,并对胎儿FC分析中伪影去除的回归模型进行了定量比较。它利用动态FC和胎儿运动的非平稳性之间的关联来检测残余噪声。为了详细验证我们的运动伪影检测技术,我们使用了神经事件和fMRI血氧水平依赖(BOLD)信号的参数生成模型。我们对70例胎龄为19-39周的胎儿进行了11种常用回归模型的系统评价。结果表明,与针对成人设计的方法相比,该方法在识别损坏FC方面具有更好的准确性。该技术表明,滤波、全局信号回归和基于解剖分量的回归模型是最有效的运动补偿模型。基准技术和现实胎儿fMRI BOLD的生成模型使研究人员能够在子宫内进行fMRI分析,有效地量化胎儿运动的影响,并评估减轻这种影响的替代回归策略。该代码可在https://github.com/cirmuw/fetalfMRIproc公开获取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Measuring the effects of motion corruption in fetal fMRI

Measuring the effects of motion corruption in fetal fMRI

Irregular and unpredictable fetal movement is the most common cause of artifacts in in utero functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), affecting analysis and limiting our understanding of early functional brain development. The accurate detection of corrupted functional connectivity (FC) resulting from motion artifacts or preprocessing, instead of neural activity, is a prerequisite for reliable and valid analysis of FC and early brain development. Approaches to address this problem in adult data are of limited utility in fetal fMRI. In this study, we evaluate a novel technique for robust computational assessment of motion artifacts, and the quantitative comparison of regression models for artifact removal in fetal FC analysis. It exploits the association between dynamic FC and non-stationarity of fetal movement, to detect residual noise. To validate our motion artifact detection technique in detail, we used a parametric generative model for neural events and fMRI blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal. We conducted a systematic evaluation of 11 commonly used regression models in a sample of 70 fetuses with gestational age of 19–39 weeks. Results demonstrate that the proposed method has better accuracy in identifying corrupted FC compared to methods designed for adults. The technique, suggests that censoring, global signal regression and anatomical component-based regression models are the most effective models for compensating motion. The benchmarking technique, and the generative model for realistic fetal fMRI BOLD enables investigators conducting in utero fMRI analysis to effectively quantify the impact of fetal motion and evaluate alternative regression strategies for mitigating this impact. The code is publicly available at: https://github.com/cirmuw/fetalfMRIproc.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Brain Mapping
Human Brain Mapping 医学-核医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
401
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Brain Mapping publishes peer-reviewed basic, clinical, technical, and theoretical research in the interdisciplinary and rapidly expanding field of human brain mapping. The journal features research derived from non-invasive brain imaging modalities used to explore the spatial and temporal organization of the neural systems supporting human behavior. Imaging modalities of interest include positron emission tomography, event-related potentials, electro-and magnetoencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging, and single-photon emission tomography. Brain mapping research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged. Article formats include Research Articles, Review Articles, Clinical Case Studies, and Technique, as well as Technological Developments, Theoretical Articles, and Synthetic Reviews. Technical advances, such as novel brain imaging methods, analyses for detecting or localizing neural activity, synergistic uses of multiple imaging modalities, and strategies for the design of behavioral paradigms and neural-systems modeling are of particular interest. The journal endorses the propagation of methodological standards and encourages database development in the field of human brain mapping.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信