迷你语言状态测试对原发性进行性失语症患者的分类和语言描述。

IF 2.1 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Elena Herrera, Claudia Acevedo, María González-Nosti
{"title":"迷你语言状态测试对原发性进行性失语症患者的分类和语言描述。","authors":"Elena Herrera, Claudia Acevedo, María González-Nosti","doi":"10.3390/geriatrics10010002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a clinical syndrome characterized by a progressive deterioration in language and speech. It is classified into three variants based on symptom patterns: logopenic, semantic, and non-fluent. Due to the lack of fully reliable and valid screening tests for diagnosing PPA and its variants, a Spanish version of the Mini Linguistic State Examination (MLSE) has recently been introduced. <b>Materials and methods.</b> This study aimed to describe the language impairments in a small sample of six patients with PPA and classify them into the three variants using the decision tree and syndrome guide proposed by the MLSE authors. <b>Results.</b> The findings demonstrate the test's utility in classifying some PPA variants through a qualitative analysis of patient performance and error types. The study revealed a 50% accuracy rate for the decision tree and an 83.33% accuracy rate when using the syndrome guide. <b>Discussion.</b> This discrepancy arises because the decision tree often classified cases as logopenic variant PPA (lvPPA) when working memory was significantly impaired. Specifically, it tended to misclassify patients with semantic, motor, or speech impairments as having lvPPA due to its reliance on the sentence repetition task for assessing working memory.</p>","PeriodicalId":12653,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755618/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Classification and Language Description of Patients with Primary Progressive Aphasia Using the Mini Linguistic State Examination Test.\",\"authors\":\"Elena Herrera, Claudia Acevedo, María González-Nosti\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/geriatrics10010002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a clinical syndrome characterized by a progressive deterioration in language and speech. It is classified into three variants based on symptom patterns: logopenic, semantic, and non-fluent. Due to the lack of fully reliable and valid screening tests for diagnosing PPA and its variants, a Spanish version of the Mini Linguistic State Examination (MLSE) has recently been introduced. <b>Materials and methods.</b> This study aimed to describe the language impairments in a small sample of six patients with PPA and classify them into the three variants using the decision tree and syndrome guide proposed by the MLSE authors. <b>Results.</b> The findings demonstrate the test's utility in classifying some PPA variants through a qualitative analysis of patient performance and error types. The study revealed a 50% accuracy rate for the decision tree and an 83.33% accuracy rate when using the syndrome guide. <b>Discussion.</b> This discrepancy arises because the decision tree often classified cases as logopenic variant PPA (lvPPA) when working memory was significantly impaired. Specifically, it tended to misclassify patients with semantic, motor, or speech impairments as having lvPPA due to its reliance on the sentence repetition task for assessing working memory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geriatrics\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755618/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geriatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics10010002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics10010002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。原发性进行性失语症(PPA)是一种以语言和言语能力进行性恶化为特征的临床综合征。它根据症状模式分为三种变体:词性、语义性和非流畅性。由于缺乏完全可靠和有效的筛查测试来诊断PPA及其变体,最近引入了西班牙语版的迷你语言国家考试(MLSE)。材料和方法。本研究旨在描述6名PPA患者的小样本语言障碍,并使用MLSE作者提出的决策树和综合征指南将其分为三种变体。结果。研究结果表明,通过对患者表现和错误类型的定性分析,该测试在对一些PPA变体进行分类方面具有实用价值。研究显示,决策树的准确率为50%,使用综合征指南时的准确率为83.33%。讨论。这种差异的产生是因为当工作记忆明显受损时,决策树通常将病例分类为记忆缺失变异PPA (lvPPA)。具体来说,它倾向于将语义、运动或言语障碍患者错误地分类为lvPPA,因为它依赖于句子重复任务来评估工作记忆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Classification and Language Description of Patients with Primary Progressive Aphasia Using the Mini Linguistic State Examination Test.

Introduction. Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a clinical syndrome characterized by a progressive deterioration in language and speech. It is classified into three variants based on symptom patterns: logopenic, semantic, and non-fluent. Due to the lack of fully reliable and valid screening tests for diagnosing PPA and its variants, a Spanish version of the Mini Linguistic State Examination (MLSE) has recently been introduced. Materials and methods. This study aimed to describe the language impairments in a small sample of six patients with PPA and classify them into the three variants using the decision tree and syndrome guide proposed by the MLSE authors. Results. The findings demonstrate the test's utility in classifying some PPA variants through a qualitative analysis of patient performance and error types. The study revealed a 50% accuracy rate for the decision tree and an 83.33% accuracy rate when using the syndrome guide. Discussion. This discrepancy arises because the decision tree often classified cases as logopenic variant PPA (lvPPA) when working memory was significantly impaired. Specifically, it tended to misclassify patients with semantic, motor, or speech impairments as having lvPPA due to its reliance on the sentence repetition task for assessing working memory.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geriatrics
Geriatrics 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
20.03 days
期刊介绍: • Geriatric biology • Geriatric health services research • Geriatric medicine research • Geriatric neurology, stroke, cognition and oncology • Geriatric surgery • Geriatric physical functioning, physical health and activity • Geriatric psychiatry and psychology • Geriatric nutrition • Geriatric epidemiology • Geriatric rehabilitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信