转换到布卢珠单抗治疗法利西单抗难治性新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性的疗效。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1007/s10384-024-01146-3
Junki Hoshino, Hidetaka Matsumoto, Kosuke Nakamura, Hideo Akiyama
{"title":"转换到布卢珠单抗治疗法利西单抗难治性新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性的疗效。","authors":"Junki Hoshino, Hidetaka Matsumoto, Kosuke Nakamura, Hideo Akiyama","doi":"10.1007/s10384-024-01146-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the treatment outcomes of switching to intravitreal brolucizumab (IVBr) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) which did not achieve a dry macula even with 4- or 8-week intervals of intravitreal faricimab (IVF).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective, interventional case series.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively studied 33 eyes of 33 consecutive patients with nAMD who switched to IVBr from IVF, assessing best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), foveal thickness (FT), central choroidal thickness (CCT), and exudative status at baseline and after the switch. For patients that switched 4 weeks after the last IVF (4-week interval group), treatment outcomes were evaluated 4 weeks after the switch. For patients that switched 8 weeks after the last IVF (8-week interval group), treatment outcomes were evaluated after the first 8-week interval following the switch.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one eyes had completed IVBr treatment up to the evaluation point after the switch. There were no significant changes in BCVA at baseline and after the switch in either group. FT and CCT significantly decreased after the switch compared with baseline in both groups. Moreover, in both groups, exudative changes disappeared or decreased in most cases after the switch. The dry macula rate after the switch was 37.5% and 34.8% in the 4-week and 8-week interval group, respectively. Although brolucizumab-related intraocular inflammation was observed in 3 eyes (9.1%) after the switch, it was ameliorated in response to steroid therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Switching to IVBr for nAMD refractory to IVF was generally effective in improving exudative changes in the short term.</p>","PeriodicalId":14563,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"221-229"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of switching to brolucizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration refractory to faricimab.\",\"authors\":\"Junki Hoshino, Hidetaka Matsumoto, Kosuke Nakamura, Hideo Akiyama\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10384-024-01146-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the treatment outcomes of switching to intravitreal brolucizumab (IVBr) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) which did not achieve a dry macula even with 4- or 8-week intervals of intravitreal faricimab (IVF).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective, interventional case series.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively studied 33 eyes of 33 consecutive patients with nAMD who switched to IVBr from IVF, assessing best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), foveal thickness (FT), central choroidal thickness (CCT), and exudative status at baseline and after the switch. For patients that switched 4 weeks after the last IVF (4-week interval group), treatment outcomes were evaluated 4 weeks after the switch. For patients that switched 8 weeks after the last IVF (8-week interval group), treatment outcomes were evaluated after the first 8-week interval following the switch.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one eyes had completed IVBr treatment up to the evaluation point after the switch. There were no significant changes in BCVA at baseline and after the switch in either group. FT and CCT significantly decreased after the switch compared with baseline in both groups. Moreover, in both groups, exudative changes disappeared or decreased in most cases after the switch. The dry macula rate after the switch was 37.5% and 34.8% in the 4-week and 8-week interval group, respectively. Although brolucizumab-related intraocular inflammation was observed in 3 eyes (9.1%) after the switch, it was ameliorated in response to steroid therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Switching to IVBr for nAMD refractory to IVF was generally effective in improving exudative changes in the short term.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"221-229\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-024-01146-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-024-01146-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估切换到玻璃体内布卢珠单抗(IVBr)治疗新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(nAMD)的治疗结果,即使玻璃体内法利西单抗(IVF)间隔4或8周也没有达到干性黄斑。研究设计:回顾性、干预性病例系列。方法:我们回顾性研究33例连续从IVF转为IVBr的nAMD患者的33只眼,评估最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、中央窝厚度(FT)、中央脉络膜厚度(CCT)以及基线和转换后的渗出情况。对于在最后一次IVF后4周转换的患者(4周间隔组),在转换后4周评估治疗结果。对于在最后一次IVF后8周切换的患者(8周间隔组),在切换后的第一个8周间隔后评估治疗结果。结果:31只眼在切换后的评估点完成了IVBr治疗。两组在基线和转换后的BCVA均无显著变化。与基线相比,两组转换后FT和CCT均显著降低。此外,两组的大多数病例在转换后渗出变化消失或减少。转换后的干斑率在4周和8周间隔组分别为37.5%和34.8%。虽然在转换后,有3只眼(9.1%)观察到与brolucizumab相关的眼内炎症,但在类固醇治疗后,炎症得到了改善。结论:IVF难治性nAMD改用IVBr一般可在短期内有效改善渗出变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of switching to brolucizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration refractory to faricimab.

Purpose: To evaluate the treatment outcomes of switching to intravitreal brolucizumab (IVBr) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) which did not achieve a dry macula even with 4- or 8-week intervals of intravitreal faricimab (IVF).

Study design: Retrospective, interventional case series.

Methods: We retrospectively studied 33 eyes of 33 consecutive patients with nAMD who switched to IVBr from IVF, assessing best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), foveal thickness (FT), central choroidal thickness (CCT), and exudative status at baseline and after the switch. For patients that switched 4 weeks after the last IVF (4-week interval group), treatment outcomes were evaluated 4 weeks after the switch. For patients that switched 8 weeks after the last IVF (8-week interval group), treatment outcomes were evaluated after the first 8-week interval following the switch.

Results: Thirty-one eyes had completed IVBr treatment up to the evaluation point after the switch. There were no significant changes in BCVA at baseline and after the switch in either group. FT and CCT significantly decreased after the switch compared with baseline in both groups. Moreover, in both groups, exudative changes disappeared or decreased in most cases after the switch. The dry macula rate after the switch was 37.5% and 34.8% in the 4-week and 8-week interval group, respectively. Although brolucizumab-related intraocular inflammation was observed in 3 eyes (9.1%) after the switch, it was ameliorated in response to steroid therapy.

Conclusion: Switching to IVBr for nAMD refractory to IVF was generally effective in improving exudative changes in the short term.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
65
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology (JJO) was inaugurated in 1957 as a quarterly journal published in English by the Ophthalmology Department of the University of Tokyo, with the aim of disseminating the achievements of Japanese ophthalmologists worldwide. JJO remains the only Japanese ophthalmology journal published in English. In 1997, the Japanese Ophthalmological Society assumed the responsibility for publishing the Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology as its official English-language publication. Currently the journal is published bimonthly and accepts papers from authors worldwide. JJO has become an international interdisciplinary forum for the publication of basic science and clinical research papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信