急性心力衰竭(PENTA-HF)的早期药理学策略:使用无扩张剂、β受体阻滞剂、矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂、钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂和血管紧张素受体-neprylisin抑制剂。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Paolo Severino, Andrea D'Amato, Silvia Prosperi, Marco Valerio Mariani, Claudia Cestiè, Vincenzo Myftari, Aurora Labbro Francia, Stefanie Marek-Iannucci, Giovanna Manzi, Domenico Filomena, Viviana Maestrini, Massimo Mancone, Roberto Badagliacca, Carmine Dario Vizza, Francesco Fedele
{"title":"急性心力衰竭(PENTA-HF)的早期药理学策略:使用无扩张剂、β受体阻滞剂、矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂、钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白-2抑制剂和血管紧张素受体-neprylisin抑制剂。","authors":"Paolo Severino, Andrea D'Amato, Silvia Prosperi, Marco Valerio Mariani, Claudia Cestiè, Vincenzo Myftari, Aurora Labbro Francia, Stefanie Marek-Iannucci, Giovanna Manzi, Domenico Filomena, Viviana Maestrini, Massimo Mancone, Roberto Badagliacca, Carmine Dario Vizza, Francesco Fedele","doi":"10.2174/0115701611334141241217044516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The management of acute heart failure (AHF) is crucial and challenging. Regarding the use of inotropes, correct patient selection and time of administration are of the essence. We hypothesize that the early use of Levosimendan favouring hemodynamic stabilization and enables rapid optimization of guideline-directed medical treatment (GDMT) in patients with HF, eventually impacting the patient's prognosis during the vulnerable phase.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, observational study enrolled consecutive patients admitted due to AHF. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis has been used to homogenize differences between groups. In group 1 (G1), patients were treated with early 24-h Levosimendan infusion followed by in-hospital introduction/up-titration of GDMT. In group 2 (G2), patients were treated with alternative inotropes/ vasopressors followed by in-hospital introduction/up-titration of GDMT. The comparison between the two groups has been performed at the 6-month follow-up in terms of cardiovascular (CV) mortality and HF hospitalizations (HFH).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>233 patients were included in the present study, and after propensity match adjustments, 176 patients were analysed, 88 patients for each group. No differences in the baseline characteristics have been reported between the groups. At 6 months follow-up, no statistically significant differences were shown in terms of the composite endpoint of CV death and HFH (p= 0.445) and CV death (p=0.62). Statistically significant differences between the two groups were reported in terms of HFH (p= 0.02). The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that patients in G1 were significantly less hospitalized compared to G2 during the 6 months after the index hospitalization (log-rank p= 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early 24-hour infusion of Levosimendan followed by rapid optimization of HF diseasemodifying therapies results in a significant reduction of HFH in the vulnerable post-discharge phase.</p>","PeriodicalId":11278,"journal":{"name":"Current vascular pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Early Pharmacological Strategy with Inodilator, bEta-blockers, Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists, Sodium-glucose coTransporter-2 Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor-neprylisin Inhibitors in Acute Heart Failure (PENTA-HF).\",\"authors\":\"Paolo Severino, Andrea D'Amato, Silvia Prosperi, Marco Valerio Mariani, Claudia Cestiè, Vincenzo Myftari, Aurora Labbro Francia, Stefanie Marek-Iannucci, Giovanna Manzi, Domenico Filomena, Viviana Maestrini, Massimo Mancone, Roberto Badagliacca, Carmine Dario Vizza, Francesco Fedele\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0115701611334141241217044516\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The management of acute heart failure (AHF) is crucial and challenging. Regarding the use of inotropes, correct patient selection and time of administration are of the essence. We hypothesize that the early use of Levosimendan favouring hemodynamic stabilization and enables rapid optimization of guideline-directed medical treatment (GDMT) in patients with HF, eventually impacting the patient's prognosis during the vulnerable phase.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, observational study enrolled consecutive patients admitted due to AHF. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis has been used to homogenize differences between groups. In group 1 (G1), patients were treated with early 24-h Levosimendan infusion followed by in-hospital introduction/up-titration of GDMT. In group 2 (G2), patients were treated with alternative inotropes/ vasopressors followed by in-hospital introduction/up-titration of GDMT. The comparison between the two groups has been performed at the 6-month follow-up in terms of cardiovascular (CV) mortality and HF hospitalizations (HFH).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>233 patients were included in the present study, and after propensity match adjustments, 176 patients were analysed, 88 patients for each group. No differences in the baseline characteristics have been reported between the groups. At 6 months follow-up, no statistically significant differences were shown in terms of the composite endpoint of CV death and HFH (p= 0.445) and CV death (p=0.62). Statistically significant differences between the two groups were reported in terms of HFH (p= 0.02). The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that patients in G1 were significantly less hospitalized compared to G2 during the 6 months after the index hospitalization (log-rank p= 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early 24-hour infusion of Levosimendan followed by rapid optimization of HF diseasemodifying therapies results in a significant reduction of HFH in the vulnerable post-discharge phase.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current vascular pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current vascular pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115701611334141241217044516\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current vascular pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115701611334141241217044516","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:急性心力衰竭(AHF)的治疗至关重要且具有挑战性。对于肌力药物的使用,正确的患者选择和给药时间是至关重要的。我们推测,早期使用左西孟旦有利于心衰患者血流动力学稳定,并能快速优化指导药物治疗(GDMT),最终影响患者易损期的预后。方法:这项前瞻性观察性研究纳入了因AHF住院的连续患者。倾向得分匹配(PSM)分析已被用来均匀化组间差异。在第一组(G1)中,患者接受早期24小时左西孟旦输注治疗,随后入院引入/提高GDMT滴度。在第2组(G2)中,患者接受替代肌力药物/血管加压药物治疗,随后在医院引入/提高GDMT滴度。在6个月的随访中,两组在心血管(CV)死亡率和心衰住院(HFH)方面进行了比较。结果:本研究纳入233例患者,经倾向匹配调整后,分析176例患者,每组88例。两组间基线特征无差异。随访6个月时,两组CV死亡和HFH复合终点(p= 0.445)和CV死亡(p=0.62)无统计学差异。两组间HFH差异有统计学意义(p= 0.02)。Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示,在指数住院后6个月内,G1组患者的住院时间明显少于G2组(log-rank p= 0.03)。结论:早期24小时输注左西孟旦,然后快速优化HF疾病改善疗法,可显著降低出院后脆弱阶段的HFH。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Early Pharmacological Strategy with Inodilator, bEta-blockers, Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists, Sodium-glucose coTransporter-2 Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor-neprylisin Inhibitors in Acute Heart Failure (PENTA-HF).

Purpose: The management of acute heart failure (AHF) is crucial and challenging. Regarding the use of inotropes, correct patient selection and time of administration are of the essence. We hypothesize that the early use of Levosimendan favouring hemodynamic stabilization and enables rapid optimization of guideline-directed medical treatment (GDMT) in patients with HF, eventually impacting the patient's prognosis during the vulnerable phase.

Methods: This prospective, observational study enrolled consecutive patients admitted due to AHF. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis has been used to homogenize differences between groups. In group 1 (G1), patients were treated with early 24-h Levosimendan infusion followed by in-hospital introduction/up-titration of GDMT. In group 2 (G2), patients were treated with alternative inotropes/ vasopressors followed by in-hospital introduction/up-titration of GDMT. The comparison between the two groups has been performed at the 6-month follow-up in terms of cardiovascular (CV) mortality and HF hospitalizations (HFH).

Results: 233 patients were included in the present study, and after propensity match adjustments, 176 patients were analysed, 88 patients for each group. No differences in the baseline characteristics have been reported between the groups. At 6 months follow-up, no statistically significant differences were shown in terms of the composite endpoint of CV death and HFH (p= 0.445) and CV death (p=0.62). Statistically significant differences between the two groups were reported in terms of HFH (p= 0.02). The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that patients in G1 were significantly less hospitalized compared to G2 during the 6 months after the index hospitalization (log-rank p= 0.03).

Conclusions: Early 24-hour infusion of Levosimendan followed by rapid optimization of HF diseasemodifying therapies results in a significant reduction of HFH in the vulnerable post-discharge phase.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current vascular pharmacology
Current vascular pharmacology 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
4.40%
发文量
54
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Vascular Pharmacology publishes clinical and research-based reviews/mini-reviews, original research articles, letters, debates, drug clinical trial studies and guest edited issues to update all those concerned with the treatment of vascular disease, bridging the gap between clinical practice and ongoing research. Vascular disease is the commonest cause of death in Westernized countries and its incidence is on the increase in developing countries. It follows that considerable research is directed at establishing effective treatment for acute vascular events. Long-term treatment has also received considerable attention (e.g. for symptomatic relief). Furthermore, effective prevention, whether primary or secondary, is backed by the findings of several landmark trials. Vascular disease is a complex field with primary care physicians and nurse practitioners as well as several specialties involved. The latter include cardiology, vascular and cardio thoracic surgery, general medicine, radiology, clinical pharmacology and neurology (stroke units).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信