细胞因子血液吸附与标准护理在心脏手术中使用Oxiris®膜:OXICARD单中心随机试验

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1097/ALN.0000000000005376
Osama Abou-Arab, Pierre Huette, Azrat Ibrahima, Christophe Beyls, Guillaume Bayart, Mathieu Guilbart, Adrien Coupez, Youssef Bennis, Aurélie Navarre, Gaelle Lenglet, Roman Béal, Gilles Touati, Thierry Caus, Stéphane Bar, Estelle Josse, Maxime Nguyen, Hervé Dupont, Brigitte Gubler, Saïd Kamel, Momar Diouf, Yazine Mahjoub
{"title":"细胞因子血液吸附与标准护理在心脏手术中使用Oxiris®膜:OXICARD单中心随机试验","authors":"Osama Abou-Arab, Pierre Huette, Azrat Ibrahima, Christophe Beyls, Guillaume Bayart, Mathieu Guilbart, Adrien Coupez, Youssef Bennis, Aurélie Navarre, Gaelle Lenglet, Roman Béal, Gilles Touati, Thierry Caus, Stéphane Bar, Estelle Josse, Maxime Nguyen, Hervé Dupont, Brigitte Gubler, Saïd Kamel, Momar Diouf, Yazine Mahjoub","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac surgery can lead to dysregulation with a proinflammatory state, resulting in adverse outcomes. Hemadsorption using the AN-69 membrane (Oxiris membrane, Baxter, USA) has the properties to chelate inflammatory cytokines. The authors hypothesized that in patients at high risk of inflammation, the use of the Oxiris membrane could decrease inflammation, preserve endothelial function, and improve postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted a randomized single-center study at Amiens University Hospital (Amiens, France). The study population consisted of adult patients admitted for scheduled cardiac surgery with an expected cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time greater than 90 min. The patients were allocated to either the standard group or the Oxiris group. The intervention consisted of using the Oxiris membrane on a Prismaflex device (Baxter, USA) at a blood flow rate of 450 ml/min during CPB. The primary outcome was the assessment of microcirculation on day 1 after surgery by measuring sublingual microcirculation using the microvascular flow index. Microvascular flow index reflects the microcirculation flow type and is graded from 0 to 3 as follows: 0, no flow; 1, intermittent flow; 2, sluggish flow; 3, continuous flow. The secondary outcome was a composite adverse outcome within 30 days after surgery. Cytokines and endothelial biomarkers were measured in all patients at different time points. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From October 2019 to November 2022, the study included 70 patients. Two patients were excluded from the Oxiris group: one patient did not undergo surgery, and one procedure was performed under deep hypothermia. The microvascular flow index did not differ between groups on day 1 from baseline: difference (95% CI) Oxiris minus standard at -0.17 (-0.44 to 0.10); P = 0.2. The occurrence of a composite adverse outcome did not significantly differ between groups (14 [42%] for the Oxiris group vs. 12 [35%] for the standard group; P = 0.7). The overall variation in cytokines and angiopoietins did not significantly differ between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients scheduled for a cardiac surgery with prolonged CPB, the authors could not demonstrate the benefit on microcirculation and major cardiovascular events.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"874-884"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11974623/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cytokine Hemoadsorption versus Standard Care in Cardiac Surgery Using the Oxiris Membrane: The OXICARD Single-center Randomized Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Osama Abou-Arab, Pierre Huette, Azrat Ibrahima, Christophe Beyls, Guillaume Bayart, Mathieu Guilbart, Adrien Coupez, Youssef Bennis, Aurélie Navarre, Gaelle Lenglet, Roman Béal, Gilles Touati, Thierry Caus, Stéphane Bar, Estelle Josse, Maxime Nguyen, Hervé Dupont, Brigitte Gubler, Saïd Kamel, Momar Diouf, Yazine Mahjoub\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac surgery can lead to dysregulation with a proinflammatory state, resulting in adverse outcomes. Hemadsorption using the AN-69 membrane (Oxiris membrane, Baxter, USA) has the properties to chelate inflammatory cytokines. The authors hypothesized that in patients at high risk of inflammation, the use of the Oxiris membrane could decrease inflammation, preserve endothelial function, and improve postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted a randomized single-center study at Amiens University Hospital (Amiens, France). The study population consisted of adult patients admitted for scheduled cardiac surgery with an expected cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time greater than 90 min. The patients were allocated to either the standard group or the Oxiris group. The intervention consisted of using the Oxiris membrane on a Prismaflex device (Baxter, USA) at a blood flow rate of 450 ml/min during CPB. The primary outcome was the assessment of microcirculation on day 1 after surgery by measuring sublingual microcirculation using the microvascular flow index. Microvascular flow index reflects the microcirculation flow type and is graded from 0 to 3 as follows: 0, no flow; 1, intermittent flow; 2, sluggish flow; 3, continuous flow. The secondary outcome was a composite adverse outcome within 30 days after surgery. Cytokines and endothelial biomarkers were measured in all patients at different time points. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From October 2019 to November 2022, the study included 70 patients. Two patients were excluded from the Oxiris group: one patient did not undergo surgery, and one procedure was performed under deep hypothermia. The microvascular flow index did not differ between groups on day 1 from baseline: difference (95% CI) Oxiris minus standard at -0.17 (-0.44 to 0.10); P = 0.2. The occurrence of a composite adverse outcome did not significantly differ between groups (14 [42%] for the Oxiris group vs. 12 [35%] for the standard group; P = 0.7). The overall variation in cytokines and angiopoietins did not significantly differ between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients scheduled for a cardiac surgery with prolonged CPB, the authors could not demonstrate the benefit on microcirculation and major cardiovascular events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"874-884\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11974623/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005376\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005376","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心脏手术可导致促炎状态的失调,导致不良后果。AN69膜(Oxiris膜)吸附血液具有螯合炎症细胞因子的特性。我们假设在炎症高风险的患者中,使用Oxiris膜可以减少炎症,保持内皮功能,改善术后预后。方法:我们在亚眠大学医院进行了一项随机单中心研究。研究人群包括接受预定心脏手术的成年患者,预计体外循环(CPB)时间超过90分钟。患者被分为标准组和Oxiris组。干预包括在CPB期间以450ml /min的血流速率在Prismaflex装置上使用Oxiris膜。主要终点是术后第1天通过使用微血管流动指数(MFI)测量舌下微循环来评估微循环。MFI反映了微循环流动类型,从0到3进行分级:0:无流动;1:间歇流;2:滞流;3:连续流动。次要结局是术后30天内的综合不良结局。在不同时间点测量所有患者的细胞因子和内皮生物标志物。进行意向治疗分析。结果:2019年10月至2022年11月,我们纳入了70例患者。2例患者被排除在Oxiris组之外:1例患者未接受手术,1例患者在深度低温下进行手术。与基线相比,第1天各组间的MFI没有差异:oxiris标准差异为-0.17 [-0.44;0.10);P = 0.2。复合不良结局的发生在两组间无显著差异(Oxiris组14例[42%]vs标准组12例[35%];P = 0.7)。细胞因子和血管生成素的总体变化在两组之间没有显著差异。结论:在计划接受心脏手术并延长CPB的患者中,我们无法证明其对微循环和主要心血管事件的益处。注册地址:https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04201119。标识符:NCT04201119。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cytokine Hemoadsorption versus Standard Care in Cardiac Surgery Using the Oxiris Membrane: The OXICARD Single-center Randomized Trial.

Background: Cardiac surgery can lead to dysregulation with a proinflammatory state, resulting in adverse outcomes. Hemadsorption using the AN-69 membrane (Oxiris membrane, Baxter, USA) has the properties to chelate inflammatory cytokines. The authors hypothesized that in patients at high risk of inflammation, the use of the Oxiris membrane could decrease inflammation, preserve endothelial function, and improve postoperative outcomes.

Methods: The authors conducted a randomized single-center study at Amiens University Hospital (Amiens, France). The study population consisted of adult patients admitted for scheduled cardiac surgery with an expected cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time greater than 90 min. The patients were allocated to either the standard group or the Oxiris group. The intervention consisted of using the Oxiris membrane on a Prismaflex device (Baxter, USA) at a blood flow rate of 450 ml/min during CPB. The primary outcome was the assessment of microcirculation on day 1 after surgery by measuring sublingual microcirculation using the microvascular flow index. Microvascular flow index reflects the microcirculation flow type and is graded from 0 to 3 as follows: 0, no flow; 1, intermittent flow; 2, sluggish flow; 3, continuous flow. The secondary outcome was a composite adverse outcome within 30 days after surgery. Cytokines and endothelial biomarkers were measured in all patients at different time points. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed.

Results: From October 2019 to November 2022, the study included 70 patients. Two patients were excluded from the Oxiris group: one patient did not undergo surgery, and one procedure was performed under deep hypothermia. The microvascular flow index did not differ between groups on day 1 from baseline: difference (95% CI) Oxiris minus standard at -0.17 (-0.44 to 0.10); P = 0.2. The occurrence of a composite adverse outcome did not significantly differ between groups (14 [42%] for the Oxiris group vs. 12 [35%] for the standard group; P = 0.7). The overall variation in cytokines and angiopoietins did not significantly differ between groups.

Conclusions: In patients scheduled for a cardiac surgery with prolonged CPB, the authors could not demonstrate the benefit on microcirculation and major cardiovascular events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anesthesiology
Anesthesiology 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
542
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: With its establishment in 1940, Anesthesiology has emerged as a prominent leader in the field of anesthesiology, encompassing perioperative, critical care, and pain medicine. As the esteemed journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Anesthesiology operates independently with full editorial freedom. Its distinguished Editorial Board, comprising renowned professionals from across the globe, drives the advancement of the specialty by presenting innovative research through immediate open access to select articles and granting free access to all published articles after a six-month period. Furthermore, Anesthesiology actively promotes groundbreaking studies through an influential press release program. The journal's unwavering commitment lies in the dissemination of exemplary work that enhances clinical practice and revolutionizes the practice of medicine within our discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信