评估地质地下水污染风险建模中的不确定性。

IF 5.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Maryam Gharekhani, Ata Allah Nadiri, Nasser Jabraili Andaryan, Mohammad Reza Nikoo
{"title":"评估地质地下水污染风险建模中的不确定性。","authors":"Maryam Gharekhani,&nbsp;Ata Allah Nadiri,&nbsp;Nasser Jabraili Andaryan,&nbsp;Mohammad Reza Nikoo","doi":"10.1007/s11356-024-35797-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Assessing groundwater contamination risk is a critical aspect of preventing and managing groundwater pollution. There was a research gap in the investigation of uncertainties in modeling groundwater contamination risks in aquifers. This study addresses this gap using Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA), with a novel focus on risk exposures from geogenic contaminants, such as lead (Pb). This was achieved through the following methodology: (1) assessing aquifer vulnerability using the SPECTR framework; (2) generating a risk index for geogenic contaminants through unsupervised methods; (3) enhancing geogenic risk through three individual models, including Gene Expression Programming (GEP), M5P, and Support Vector Machines (SVM); (4) combining results from individual models using BMA; and (5) examining inherent uncertainties, accounting for both between-model and within-model variances. The model’s efficacy was evaluated using measured Pb concentrations within the aquifer. The findings indicated that the unsupervised risk index had an acceptable correlation, while the individual models were accurate and enhanced the predictability of the data. BMA assigned the higher posterior probabilities (weight) to the SVM model, which indicates a positive correlation between the performance criteria of individual models and the weight values. Also, BMA revealed that the modeling uncertainty is influenced by within-model variance, primarily by the kriging interpolation method.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":545,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","volume":"32 7","pages":"4019 - 4039"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing uncertainties in modeling the risk of geogenic groundwater contamination\",\"authors\":\"Maryam Gharekhani,&nbsp;Ata Allah Nadiri,&nbsp;Nasser Jabraili Andaryan,&nbsp;Mohammad Reza Nikoo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11356-024-35797-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Assessing groundwater contamination risk is a critical aspect of preventing and managing groundwater pollution. There was a research gap in the investigation of uncertainties in modeling groundwater contamination risks in aquifers. This study addresses this gap using Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA), with a novel focus on risk exposures from geogenic contaminants, such as lead (Pb). This was achieved through the following methodology: (1) assessing aquifer vulnerability using the SPECTR framework; (2) generating a risk index for geogenic contaminants through unsupervised methods; (3) enhancing geogenic risk through three individual models, including Gene Expression Programming (GEP), M5P, and Support Vector Machines (SVM); (4) combining results from individual models using BMA; and (5) examining inherent uncertainties, accounting for both between-model and within-model variances. The model’s efficacy was evaluated using measured Pb concentrations within the aquifer. The findings indicated that the unsupervised risk index had an acceptable correlation, while the individual models were accurate and enhanced the predictability of the data. BMA assigned the higher posterior probabilities (weight) to the SVM model, which indicates a positive correlation between the performance criteria of individual models and the weight values. Also, BMA revealed that the modeling uncertainty is influenced by within-model variance, primarily by the kriging interpolation method.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science and Pollution Research\",\"volume\":\"32 7\",\"pages\":\"4019 - 4039\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science and Pollution Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-024-35797-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-024-35797-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地下水污染风险评估是预防和管理地下水污染的一个重要方面。在含水层地下水污染风险模拟中的不确定性研究方面还存在空白。本研究利用贝叶斯平均模型(BMA)解决了这一差距,并将新的重点放在了来自铅(Pb)等地质污染物的风险暴露上。这是通过以下方法实现的:(1)使用specr框架评估含水层脆弱性;(2)采用无监督方法建立地质污染物风险指数;(3)通过基因表达规划(GEP)、M5P和支持向量机(SVM)三种个体模型增强地质风险;(4)利用BMA对各个模型的结果进行组合;(5)检查固有的不确定性,考虑模型间和模型内的方差。通过测量含水层内的铅浓度来评价该模型的有效性。结果表明,无监督风险指数具有可接受的相关性,而个体模型是准确的,增强了数据的可预测性。BMA将较高的后验概率(权重)赋给支持向量机模型,这表明单个模型的性能标准与权重值呈正相关。模型不确定性受模型内方差的影响,主要受kriging插值法的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing uncertainties in modeling the risk of geogenic groundwater contamination

Assessing groundwater contamination risk is a critical aspect of preventing and managing groundwater pollution. There was a research gap in the investigation of uncertainties in modeling groundwater contamination risks in aquifers. This study addresses this gap using Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA), with a novel focus on risk exposures from geogenic contaminants, such as lead (Pb). This was achieved through the following methodology: (1) assessing aquifer vulnerability using the SPECTR framework; (2) generating a risk index for geogenic contaminants through unsupervised methods; (3) enhancing geogenic risk through three individual models, including Gene Expression Programming (GEP), M5P, and Support Vector Machines (SVM); (4) combining results from individual models using BMA; and (5) examining inherent uncertainties, accounting for both between-model and within-model variances. The model’s efficacy was evaluated using measured Pb concentrations within the aquifer. The findings indicated that the unsupervised risk index had an acceptable correlation, while the individual models were accurate and enhanced the predictability of the data. BMA assigned the higher posterior probabilities (weight) to the SVM model, which indicates a positive correlation between the performance criteria of individual models and the weight values. Also, BMA revealed that the modeling uncertainty is influenced by within-model variance, primarily by the kriging interpolation method.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
6549
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science and Pollution Research (ESPR) serves the international community in all areas of Environmental Science and related subjects with emphasis on chemical compounds. This includes: - Terrestrial Biology and Ecology - Aquatic Biology and Ecology - Atmospheric Chemistry - Environmental Microbiology/Biobased Energy Sources - Phytoremediation and Ecosystem Restoration - Environmental Analyses and Monitoring - Assessment of Risks and Interactions of Pollutants in the Environment - Conservation Biology and Sustainable Agriculture - Impact of Chemicals/Pollutants on Human and Animal Health It reports from a broad interdisciplinary outlook.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信