Ashkan Shoamanesh, Thalia S Field, Shelagh B Coutts, Mukul Sharma, David Gladstone, Robert G Hart, Giuseppe Boriani, David J Wright, Christian Sticherling, David H Birnie, Michael R Gold, Julia W Erath, Valentina Kutyifa, Rajibul Mian, Alexander P Benz, Christopher B Granger, William F McIntyre, Stuart J Connolly, Jens Cosedis Nielsen, Marco Alings, Jeff S Healey
{"title":"阿哌沙班与阿司匹林对亚临床心房颤动和卒中或短暂性缺血性发作史患者的卒中预防作用:ARTESiA随机对照试验的亚组分析","authors":"Ashkan Shoamanesh, Thalia S Field, Shelagh B Coutts, Mukul Sharma, David Gladstone, Robert G Hart, Giuseppe Boriani, David J Wright, Christian Sticherling, David H Birnie, Michael R Gold, Julia W Erath, Valentina Kutyifa, Rajibul Mian, Alexander P Benz, Christopher B Granger, William F McIntyre, Stuart J Connolly, Jens Cosedis Nielsen, Marco Alings, Jeff S Healey","doi":"10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00475-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>People with subclinical atrial fibrillation are at increased risk of stroke, albeit to a lesser extent than those with clinical atrial fibrillation, leading to an ongoing debate regarding the benefit of anticoagulation in these individuals. In the ARTESiA trial, the direct-acting oral anticoagulant apixaban reduced stroke or systemic embolism compared with aspirin in people with subclinical atrial fibrillation, but the risk of major bleeding was increased with apixaban. In a prespecified subgroup analysis of ARTESiA, we tested the hypothesis that people with subclinical atrial fibrillation and a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack, who are known to have an increased risk of recurrent stroke, would show a greater benefit from oral anticoagulation for secondary stroke prevention compared with those without a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack.<h3>Methods</h3>ARTESiA is a double-blind, double-dummy, randomised controlled trial conducted at 247 sites in 16 countries across Europe and North America. Adults aged 55 years or older with device-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation lasting from 6 min to 24 h and a CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score of 3 or higher were randomly assigned using an interactive web-based system to oral apixaban 5 mg twice per day or oral aspirin 81 mg once per day. The primary efficacy outcome was stroke or systemic embolism, and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding, assessed as absolute risk differences. Analyses were by intention to treat. ARTESiA is registered with <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span> (<span><span>NCT01938248</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span>) and is completed; this report presents a prespecified subgroup analysis in people with a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack.<h3>Findings</h3>Between May 7, 2015, and July 30, 2021, 4012 people with subclinical atrial fibrillation were randomly allocated either apixaban (n=2015) or aspirin (n=1997). A history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack was present in 346 (8·6%) participants (172 assigned to apixaban and 174 to aspirin), among whom the annual rate of stroke or systemic embolism was 1·20% (n=7; 95% CI 0·48 to 2·48) with apixaban versus 3·14% (n=18; 1·86 to 4·96) with aspirin; (hazard ratio [HR] 0·40, 95% CI 0·17 to 0·95). In participants without a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack (n=3666; 1843 assigned to apixaban and 1823 to aspirin), the annual rate of stroke or systemic embolism was 0·74% (n=48; 95% CI 0·55 to 0·98) with apixaban versus 1·07% (n=68; 95% CI 0·83 to 1·36) with aspirin (HR 0·69, 95% CI 0·48 to 1·00). The absolute risk difference in incidence of stroke or systemic embolism at 3·5 years of follow-up was 7% (95% CI 2 to 12) in participants with versus 1% (0 to 3) in participants without a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack. The annual rate of major bleeding in participants with a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack was 2·26% with apixaban (n=13; 95% CI 1·21 to 3·87) versus 1·16% with aspirin (n=7; 0·47 to 2·39; HR 1·94, 95% CI 0·77 to 4·87). The absolute risk difference in major bleeding events at 3·5 years was 3% (–1 to 8) in individuals with a versus 1% (–1 to 2) in those without a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack.<h3>Interpretation</h3>Treatment with the direct-acting oral anticoagulant apixaban in people with subclinical atrial fibrillation and a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack led to a 7% absolute risk reduction in stroke or systemic embolism over 3·5 years, compared with a 1% absolute risk reduction for individuals without a previous history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack. The corresponding absolute increase in major bleeding was 3% and 1%, respectively. Apixaban could be considered for secondary stroke prevention in people with subclinical atrial fibrillation and a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack.<h3>Funding</h3>The Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Bristol-Myers Squibb–Pfizer Alliance, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Canadian Stroke Prevention and Intervention Network, Hamilton Health Sciences, Accelerating Clinical Trials Network, Population Health Research Institute, and Medtronic.","PeriodicalId":22676,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Neurology","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Apixaban versus aspirin for stroke prevention in people with subclinical atrial fibrillation and a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack: subgroup analysis of the ARTESiA randomised controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Ashkan Shoamanesh, Thalia S Field, Shelagh B Coutts, Mukul Sharma, David Gladstone, Robert G Hart, Giuseppe Boriani, David J Wright, Christian Sticherling, David H Birnie, Michael R Gold, Julia W Erath, Valentina Kutyifa, Rajibul Mian, Alexander P Benz, Christopher B Granger, William F McIntyre, Stuart J Connolly, Jens Cosedis Nielsen, Marco Alings, Jeff S Healey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00475-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Background</h3>People with subclinical atrial fibrillation are at increased risk of stroke, albeit to a lesser extent than those with clinical atrial fibrillation, leading to an ongoing debate regarding the benefit of anticoagulation in these individuals. In the ARTESiA trial, the direct-acting oral anticoagulant apixaban reduced stroke or systemic embolism compared with aspirin in people with subclinical atrial fibrillation, but the risk of major bleeding was increased with apixaban. In a prespecified subgroup analysis of ARTESiA, we tested the hypothesis that people with subclinical atrial fibrillation and a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack, who are known to have an increased risk of recurrent stroke, would show a greater benefit from oral anticoagulation for secondary stroke prevention compared with those without a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack.<h3>Methods</h3>ARTESiA is a double-blind, double-dummy, randomised controlled trial conducted at 247 sites in 16 countries across Europe and North America. Adults aged 55 years or older with device-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation lasting from 6 min to 24 h and a CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score of 3 or higher were randomly assigned using an interactive web-based system to oral apixaban 5 mg twice per day or oral aspirin 81 mg once per day. The primary efficacy outcome was stroke or systemic embolism, and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding, assessed as absolute risk differences. Analyses were by intention to treat. ARTESiA is registered with <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg aria-label=\\\"Opens in new window\\\" focusable=\\\"false\\\" height=\\\"20\\\" viewbox=\\\"0 0 8 8\\\"><path d=\\\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\\\"></path></svg></span> (<span><span>NCT01938248</span><svg aria-label=\\\"Opens in new window\\\" focusable=\\\"false\\\" height=\\\"20\\\" viewbox=\\\"0 0 8 8\\\"><path d=\\\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\\\"></path></svg></span>) and is completed; this report presents a prespecified subgroup analysis in people with a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack.<h3>Findings</h3>Between May 7, 2015, and July 30, 2021, 4012 people with subclinical atrial fibrillation were randomly allocated either apixaban (n=2015) or aspirin (n=1997). A history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack was present in 346 (8·6%) participants (172 assigned to apixaban and 174 to aspirin), among whom the annual rate of stroke or systemic embolism was 1·20% (n=7; 95% CI 0·48 to 2·48) with apixaban versus 3·14% (n=18; 1·86 to 4·96) with aspirin; (hazard ratio [HR] 0·40, 95% CI 0·17 to 0·95). In participants without a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack (n=3666; 1843 assigned to apixaban and 1823 to aspirin), the annual rate of stroke or systemic embolism was 0·74% (n=48; 95% CI 0·55 to 0·98) with apixaban versus 1·07% (n=68; 95% CI 0·83 to 1·36) with aspirin (HR 0·69, 95% CI 0·48 to 1·00). The absolute risk difference in incidence of stroke or systemic embolism at 3·5 years of follow-up was 7% (95% CI 2 to 12) in participants with versus 1% (0 to 3) in participants without a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack. The annual rate of major bleeding in participants with a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack was 2·26% with apixaban (n=13; 95% CI 1·21 to 3·87) versus 1·16% with aspirin (n=7; 0·47 to 2·39; HR 1·94, 95% CI 0·77 to 4·87). The absolute risk difference in major bleeding events at 3·5 years was 3% (–1 to 8) in individuals with a versus 1% (–1 to 2) in those without a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack.<h3>Interpretation</h3>Treatment with the direct-acting oral anticoagulant apixaban in people with subclinical atrial fibrillation and a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack led to a 7% absolute risk reduction in stroke or systemic embolism over 3·5 years, compared with a 1% absolute risk reduction for individuals without a previous history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack. The corresponding absolute increase in major bleeding was 3% and 1%, respectively. Apixaban could be considered for secondary stroke prevention in people with subclinical atrial fibrillation and a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack.<h3>Funding</h3>The Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Bristol-Myers Squibb–Pfizer Alliance, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Canadian Stroke Prevention and Intervention Network, Hamilton Health Sciences, Accelerating Clinical Trials Network, Population Health Research Institute, and Medtronic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Lancet Neurology\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Lancet Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00475-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00475-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:亚临床房颤患者中风的风险增加,尽管程度低于临床房颤患者,这导致了对这些个体抗凝治疗的益处的持续争论。在ARTESiA试验中,与阿司匹林相比,直接作用口服抗凝剂阿哌沙班减少了亚临床房颤患者的中风或全身栓塞,但阿哌沙班增加了大出血的风险。在ARTESiA预先指定的亚组分析中,我们检验了一个假设,即有亚临床房颤和卒中或短暂性缺血发作史的人,已知卒中复发风险增加,与没有卒中或短暂性缺血发作史的人相比,口服抗凝对继发性卒中预防的益处更大。方法sartesia是一项双盲、双虚拟、随机对照试验,在欧洲和北美16个国家的247个试验点进行。年龄在55岁或以上、设备检测到亚临床房颤持续6分钟至24小时、CHA2DS2-VASc评分为3分或更高的成年人,使用交互式网络系统随机分配到口服阿哌沙班5毫克,每天2次或口服阿司匹林81毫克,每天1次。主要疗效终点是卒中或全身性栓塞,主要安全性终点是大出血,以绝对风险差异评估。分析的目的是治疗。ARTESiA已在ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01938248)注册并已完成;本报告提出了预先指定的亚组分析的人与中风或短暂性脑缺血发作的历史。在2015年5月7日至2021年7月30日期间,4012名亚临床心房颤动患者被随机分配阿哌沙班(n=2015)或阿司匹林(n=1997)。346名(8.6%)参与者存在卒中或短暂性缺血发作史(172名分配给阿哌沙班,174名分配给阿司匹林),其中卒中或全身性栓塞的年发生率为1.20% (n=7;95% CI为0.48 ~ 2.48),而阿哌沙班组为3.14% (n=18;1·86 ~ 4·96);(风险比[HR] 0.40, 95% CI 0.17 ~ 0.95)。无卒中或短暂性缺血性发作史的受试者(n=3666;1843例分配给阿哌沙班,1823例分配给阿司匹林),卒中或全身性栓塞的年发生率为0.74% (n=48;95% CI为0.55 ~ 0.98),而阿哌沙班组为1.07% (n=68;95% CI 0.83 ~ 1.36)(危险度0.69,95% CI 0.48 ~ 1.00)。随访3.5年时,卒中或全身性栓塞发生率的绝对风险差异在有卒中或短暂性缺血性发作史的受试者中为7% (95% CI 2 - 12),而在无卒中或短暂性缺血性发作史的受试者中为1%(0 - 3)。阿哌沙班组有卒中或短暂性缺血性发作史的患者大出血年发生率为2.26% (n=13;95% CI为1.21 ~ 3.87),阿司匹林组为1.16% (n=7;0·47 ~ 2·39;HR 1.94, 95% CI 0.77 ~ 4.87)。3.5岁时大出血事件的绝对风险差异在有中风或短暂性缺血发作史的患者中为3%(-1至8),而在没有中风或短暂性缺血发作史的患者中为1%(-1至2)。解释:对有亚临床房颤和卒中或短暂性缺血性发作史的患者使用直接作用口服抗凝药物阿哌沙班治疗,在3.5年内卒中或全身性栓塞的绝对风险降低7%,而没有卒中或短暂性缺血性发作史的患者的绝对风险降低1%。相应的大出血绝对增加分别为3%和1%。阿哌沙班可用于亚临床心房颤动和卒中或短暂性缺血性发作史患者的二级卒中预防。加拿大卫生研究院、百时美施贵宝-辉瑞联盟、加拿大心脏和中风基金会、加拿大中风预防和干预网络、汉密尔顿健康科学、加速临床试验网络、人口健康研究所和美敦力。
Apixaban versus aspirin for stroke prevention in people with subclinical atrial fibrillation and a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack: subgroup analysis of the ARTESiA randomised controlled trial
Background
People with subclinical atrial fibrillation are at increased risk of stroke, albeit to a lesser extent than those with clinical atrial fibrillation, leading to an ongoing debate regarding the benefit of anticoagulation in these individuals. In the ARTESiA trial, the direct-acting oral anticoagulant apixaban reduced stroke or systemic embolism compared with aspirin in people with subclinical atrial fibrillation, but the risk of major bleeding was increased with apixaban. In a prespecified subgroup analysis of ARTESiA, we tested the hypothesis that people with subclinical atrial fibrillation and a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack, who are known to have an increased risk of recurrent stroke, would show a greater benefit from oral anticoagulation for secondary stroke prevention compared with those without a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack.
Methods
ARTESiA is a double-blind, double-dummy, randomised controlled trial conducted at 247 sites in 16 countries across Europe and North America. Adults aged 55 years or older with device-detected subclinical atrial fibrillation lasting from 6 min to 24 h and a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 3 or higher were randomly assigned using an interactive web-based system to oral apixaban 5 mg twice per day or oral aspirin 81 mg once per day. The primary efficacy outcome was stroke or systemic embolism, and the primary safety outcome was major bleeding, assessed as absolute risk differences. Analyses were by intention to treat. ARTESiA is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01938248) and is completed; this report presents a prespecified subgroup analysis in people with a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack.
Findings
Between May 7, 2015, and July 30, 2021, 4012 people with subclinical atrial fibrillation were randomly allocated either apixaban (n=2015) or aspirin (n=1997). A history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack was present in 346 (8·6%) participants (172 assigned to apixaban and 174 to aspirin), among whom the annual rate of stroke or systemic embolism was 1·20% (n=7; 95% CI 0·48 to 2·48) with apixaban versus 3·14% (n=18; 1·86 to 4·96) with aspirin; (hazard ratio [HR] 0·40, 95% CI 0·17 to 0·95). In participants without a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack (n=3666; 1843 assigned to apixaban and 1823 to aspirin), the annual rate of stroke or systemic embolism was 0·74% (n=48; 95% CI 0·55 to 0·98) with apixaban versus 1·07% (n=68; 95% CI 0·83 to 1·36) with aspirin (HR 0·69, 95% CI 0·48 to 1·00). The absolute risk difference in incidence of stroke or systemic embolism at 3·5 years of follow-up was 7% (95% CI 2 to 12) in participants with versus 1% (0 to 3) in participants without a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack. The annual rate of major bleeding in participants with a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack was 2·26% with apixaban (n=13; 95% CI 1·21 to 3·87) versus 1·16% with aspirin (n=7; 0·47 to 2·39; HR 1·94, 95% CI 0·77 to 4·87). The absolute risk difference in major bleeding events at 3·5 years was 3% (–1 to 8) in individuals with a versus 1% (–1 to 2) in those without a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack.
Interpretation
Treatment with the direct-acting oral anticoagulant apixaban in people with subclinical atrial fibrillation and a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack led to a 7% absolute risk reduction in stroke or systemic embolism over 3·5 years, compared with a 1% absolute risk reduction for individuals without a previous history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack. The corresponding absolute increase in major bleeding was 3% and 1%, respectively. Apixaban could be considered for secondary stroke prevention in people with subclinical atrial fibrillation and a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack.
Funding
The Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Bristol-Myers Squibb–Pfizer Alliance, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Canadian Stroke Prevention and Intervention Network, Hamilton Health Sciences, Accelerating Clinical Trials Network, Population Health Research Institute, and Medtronic.