跨越血脑屏障:神经系统疾病的新治疗策略

Josephine H Pedder, Adam M Sonabend, Michael D Cearns, Benedict D Michael, Rasheed Zakaria, Amy B Heimberger, Michael D Jenkinson, David Dickens
{"title":"跨越血脑屏障:神经系统疾病的新治疗策略","authors":"Josephine H Pedder, Adam M Sonabend, Michael D Cearns, Benedict D Michael, Rasheed Zakaria, Amy B Heimberger, Michael D Jenkinson, David Dickens","doi":"10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00476-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The blood–brain barrier is a physiological barrier that can prevent both small and complex drugs from reaching the brain to exert a pharmacological effect. For treatment of neurological diseases, drug concentrations at the target site are a fundamental parameter for therapeutic effect; thus, the blood–brain barrier is a major obstacle to overcome. Novel strategies have been developed to circumvent the blood–brain barrier, including CSF delivery, intracranial delivery, ultrasound-based methods, membrane transporters, receptor-mediated transcytosis, and nanotherapeutics. These approaches each have their advantages and disadvantages. CSF delivery and intracranial delivery are direct but invasive techniques that have not yet shown efficacy in clinical trials, although development of novel delivery devices might improve these approaches. Ultrasound-based disruption has shown some efficacy in clinical trials, but it can require invasive procedures. Approaches using membrane transporters and receptor-mediated transcytosis are less invasive than are other techniques, but they can have off-target effects. Nanotherapeutics have shown promise, but these strategies are in early stages of development. Advancements in drug delivery across the blood–brain barrier will require appropriately designed and powered clinical studies, with a focus on the timing of treatment, demographic and genetic considerations, head-to-head comparison with other treatment strategies (rather than a placebo), and relevant primary and secondary outcome measures.","PeriodicalId":22676,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Neurology","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crossing the blood–brain barrier: emerging therapeutic strategies for neurological disease\",\"authors\":\"Josephine H Pedder, Adam M Sonabend, Michael D Cearns, Benedict D Michael, Rasheed Zakaria, Amy B Heimberger, Michael D Jenkinson, David Dickens\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00476-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The blood–brain barrier is a physiological barrier that can prevent both small and complex drugs from reaching the brain to exert a pharmacological effect. For treatment of neurological diseases, drug concentrations at the target site are a fundamental parameter for therapeutic effect; thus, the blood–brain barrier is a major obstacle to overcome. Novel strategies have been developed to circumvent the blood–brain barrier, including CSF delivery, intracranial delivery, ultrasound-based methods, membrane transporters, receptor-mediated transcytosis, and nanotherapeutics. These approaches each have their advantages and disadvantages. CSF delivery and intracranial delivery are direct but invasive techniques that have not yet shown efficacy in clinical trials, although development of novel delivery devices might improve these approaches. Ultrasound-based disruption has shown some efficacy in clinical trials, but it can require invasive procedures. Approaches using membrane transporters and receptor-mediated transcytosis are less invasive than are other techniques, but they can have off-target effects. Nanotherapeutics have shown promise, but these strategies are in early stages of development. Advancements in drug delivery across the blood–brain barrier will require appropriately designed and powered clinical studies, with a focus on the timing of treatment, demographic and genetic considerations, head-to-head comparison with other treatment strategies (rather than a placebo), and relevant primary and secondary outcome measures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Lancet Neurology\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Lancet Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00476-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00476-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

血脑屏障是一种生理屏障,可以阻止小药物和复杂药物到达大脑发挥药理作用。对于神经系统疾病的治疗,靶部位的药物浓度是治疗效果的基本参数;因此,血脑屏障是需要克服的主要障碍。已经开发出新的策略来绕过血脑屏障,包括脑脊液输送、颅内输送、基于超声的方法、膜转运体、受体介导的胞质转运和纳米疗法。这些方法各有优缺点。脑脊液输送和颅内输送是直接但侵入性的技术,尚未在临床试验中显示出疗效,尽管新型输送装置的发展可能会改进这些方法。基于超声波的破坏在临床试验中显示出一定的效果,但它可能需要侵入性手术。使用膜转运蛋白和受体介导的胞吞作用的方法比其他技术侵入性小,但它们可能有脱靶效应。纳米疗法已经显示出前景,但这些策略还处于发展的早期阶段。通过血脑屏障给药的进展将需要适当设计和提供动力的临床研究,重点是治疗时机、人口统计学和遗传因素、与其他治疗策略(而不是安慰剂)的直接比较,以及相关的主要和次要结果测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Crossing the blood–brain barrier: emerging therapeutic strategies for neurological disease
The blood–brain barrier is a physiological barrier that can prevent both small and complex drugs from reaching the brain to exert a pharmacological effect. For treatment of neurological diseases, drug concentrations at the target site are a fundamental parameter for therapeutic effect; thus, the blood–brain barrier is a major obstacle to overcome. Novel strategies have been developed to circumvent the blood–brain barrier, including CSF delivery, intracranial delivery, ultrasound-based methods, membrane transporters, receptor-mediated transcytosis, and nanotherapeutics. These approaches each have their advantages and disadvantages. CSF delivery and intracranial delivery are direct but invasive techniques that have not yet shown efficacy in clinical trials, although development of novel delivery devices might improve these approaches. Ultrasound-based disruption has shown some efficacy in clinical trials, but it can require invasive procedures. Approaches using membrane transporters and receptor-mediated transcytosis are less invasive than are other techniques, but they can have off-target effects. Nanotherapeutics have shown promise, but these strategies are in early stages of development. Advancements in drug delivery across the blood–brain barrier will require appropriately designed and powered clinical studies, with a focus on the timing of treatment, demographic and genetic considerations, head-to-head comparison with other treatment strategies (rather than a placebo), and relevant primary and secondary outcome measures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信