{"title":"肿瘤患者吗啡和氢吗啡酮治疗起始期谵妄发生率的回顾性比较研究。","authors":"Hironori Tanaka, Rei Tanaka, Takeshi Kamoshida, Shigeki Morimoto, Junya Sato, Hiroshi Ishikawa, Tetsu Sato, Tetsumi Sato, Akiyoshi Saitoh, Daisuke Yamada, Mina Kondo, Kenji Takahashi, Chieko Takahashi, Michihiro Shino","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.3515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioids are known to induce delirium, and the incidence of delirium induced by individual opioids has been investigated. However, only a limited number of studies have examined the incidence of delirium induced by oral hydromorphone.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether differences exist in the incidence of delirium associated with oral morphine and oral hydromorphone during the initiation phase of treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The participants were opioid-naive inpatients with cancer who started oral morphine or oral hydromorphone at Shizuoka Cancer Center (in Shizuoka, Japan) between June 2017 and November 2020. The incidence of delirium in the first week of opioid use was compared between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 90 patients met the inclusion criteria, 27 who received oral hydromorphone and 63 who received oral morphine. The incidence rate of delirium in the oral hydromorphone group tended to be higher (19%, 5/27) than in the oral morphine group (8%, 5/63), although the difference was not statistically significant (odds ratio 0.4, 95% confidence interval, 0.1-1.4, <i>p</i> = 0.16 by the Fisher exact test). Propensity score matching was used to control for differences in patient background as confounders in the development of delirium, following which the incidence rate of delirium remained higher, but not significantly so, in the oral hydromorphone group (11%, 2/19) than in the oral morphine group (5%, 1/19) (odds ratio 0.5, 95% confidence interval 0.04-5.7, <i>p</i> > 0.99 by the Fisher exact test).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of delirium between those who received morphine and those who received hydromorphone, which suggests that for opioid-naive inpatients with cancer, oral hydromorphone can be used in a manner similar to that for oral morphine.</p>","PeriodicalId":94225,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","volume":"78 1","pages":"e3515"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11722330/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence of Delirium during the Initiation Phase of Morphine and Hydromorphone Therapy in Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Comparative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Hironori Tanaka, Rei Tanaka, Takeshi Kamoshida, Shigeki Morimoto, Junya Sato, Hiroshi Ishikawa, Tetsu Sato, Tetsumi Sato, Akiyoshi Saitoh, Daisuke Yamada, Mina Kondo, Kenji Takahashi, Chieko Takahashi, Michihiro Shino\",\"doi\":\"10.4212/cjhp.3515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioids are known to induce delirium, and the incidence of delirium induced by individual opioids has been investigated. However, only a limited number of studies have examined the incidence of delirium induced by oral hydromorphone.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether differences exist in the incidence of delirium associated with oral morphine and oral hydromorphone during the initiation phase of treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The participants were opioid-naive inpatients with cancer who started oral morphine or oral hydromorphone at Shizuoka Cancer Center (in Shizuoka, Japan) between June 2017 and November 2020. The incidence of delirium in the first week of opioid use was compared between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 90 patients met the inclusion criteria, 27 who received oral hydromorphone and 63 who received oral morphine. The incidence rate of delirium in the oral hydromorphone group tended to be higher (19%, 5/27) than in the oral morphine group (8%, 5/63), although the difference was not statistically significant (odds ratio 0.4, 95% confidence interval, 0.1-1.4, <i>p</i> = 0.16 by the Fisher exact test). Propensity score matching was used to control for differences in patient background as confounders in the development of delirium, following which the incidence rate of delirium remained higher, but not significantly so, in the oral hydromorphone group (11%, 2/19) than in the oral morphine group (5%, 1/19) (odds ratio 0.5, 95% confidence interval 0.04-5.7, <i>p</i> > 0.99 by the Fisher exact test).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of delirium between those who received morphine and those who received hydromorphone, which suggests that for opioid-naive inpatients with cancer, oral hydromorphone can be used in a manner similar to that for oral morphine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"e3515\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11722330/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.3515\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.3515","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:已知阿片类药物可诱发谵妄,并且已对个体阿片类药物引起谵妄的发生率进行了调查。然而,只有有限数量的研究调查了口服氢吗啡酮引起谵妄的发生率。目的:探讨口服吗啡与口服氢吗啡酮在治疗初期谵妄发生率的差异。方法:参与者是2017年6月至2020年11月在日本静冈县静冈县癌症中心(Shizuoka cancer Center)开始口服吗啡或口服氢吗啡酮的未使用阿片类药物的住院癌症患者。比较两组在阿片类药物使用第一周谵妄的发生率。结果:90例患者符合纳入标准,其中口服氢吗啡酮27例,口服吗啡63例。口服氢吗啡酮组谵妄发生率(19%,5/27)倾向于高于口服吗啡组(8%,5/63),但差异无统计学意义(Fisher精确检验优势比0.4,95%可信区间为0.1 ~ 1.4,p = 0.16)。倾向评分匹配用于控制患者背景差异作为谵妄发生的混杂因素,此后,口服氢吗啡酮组谵妄发生率(11%,2/19)仍高于口服吗啡组(5%,1/19)(Fisher精确检验比值比为0.5,95%可信区间为0.04-5.7,p < 0 0.99)。结论:吗啡组与氢吗啡酮组谵妄发生率无统计学差异,提示对于未使用阿片类药物的癌症住院患者,口服氢吗啡酮可与口服吗啡类似使用。
Incidence of Delirium during the Initiation Phase of Morphine and Hydromorphone Therapy in Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Comparative Study.
Background: Opioids are known to induce delirium, and the incidence of delirium induced by individual opioids has been investigated. However, only a limited number of studies have examined the incidence of delirium induced by oral hydromorphone.
Objective: To investigate whether differences exist in the incidence of delirium associated with oral morphine and oral hydromorphone during the initiation phase of treatment.
Methods: The participants were opioid-naive inpatients with cancer who started oral morphine or oral hydromorphone at Shizuoka Cancer Center (in Shizuoka, Japan) between June 2017 and November 2020. The incidence of delirium in the first week of opioid use was compared between the 2 groups.
Results: A total of 90 patients met the inclusion criteria, 27 who received oral hydromorphone and 63 who received oral morphine. The incidence rate of delirium in the oral hydromorphone group tended to be higher (19%, 5/27) than in the oral morphine group (8%, 5/63), although the difference was not statistically significant (odds ratio 0.4, 95% confidence interval, 0.1-1.4, p = 0.16 by the Fisher exact test). Propensity score matching was used to control for differences in patient background as confounders in the development of delirium, following which the incidence rate of delirium remained higher, but not significantly so, in the oral hydromorphone group (11%, 2/19) than in the oral morphine group (5%, 1/19) (odds ratio 0.5, 95% confidence interval 0.04-5.7, p > 0.99 by the Fisher exact test).
Conclusions: There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of delirium between those who received morphine and those who received hydromorphone, which suggests that for opioid-naive inpatients with cancer, oral hydromorphone can be used in a manner similar to that for oral morphine.