{"title":"基于人工智能的非接触光学血压生物测量非散瞳眼底成像分析。","authors":"Idan Bressler, Dolev Dollberg, Rachelle Aviv, Danny Margalit, Alon Harris, Brent Siesky, Tsontcho Ianchulev, Zack Dvey-Aharon","doi":"10.1101/2025.01.06.25320084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study was developed to determine whether a machine learning model could be developed to assess blood pressure with accuracy comparable to arm cuff measurements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A deep learning model was developed based on the UK Biobank dataset and was trained to detect both systolic and diastolic pressure. The hypothesis was formulated after data collection and before the development of the model. Comparison was conducted between arm cuff measurements, as ground truth, and results from the model, using Mean Absolute Error, Mean Squared Error, and Coefficient of Determination (R^2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Systolic pressure was measured with 9.81 Mean Absolute Error, 165.13 Mean Squared Error and 0.36 R^2. Diastolic pressure was measured with 6.00 Mean Absolute Error, 58.21 and 0.30 R^2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This model improves on existing research and shows errors comparable to the variability of hand cuff measurements. The use of fundus images to assess blood pressure may be more indicative of long-term hypertension. Additional trials in clinical settings may be necessary, as well as additional prospective studies to validate results.</p>","PeriodicalId":94281,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11741447/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-Contact Optical Blood Pressure Biometry Using AI-Based Analysis of Non-Mydriatic Fundus Imaging.\",\"authors\":\"Idan Bressler, Dolev Dollberg, Rachelle Aviv, Danny Margalit, Alon Harris, Brent Siesky, Tsontcho Ianchulev, Zack Dvey-Aharon\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2025.01.06.25320084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study was developed to determine whether a machine learning model could be developed to assess blood pressure with accuracy comparable to arm cuff measurements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A deep learning model was developed based on the UK Biobank dataset and was trained to detect both systolic and diastolic pressure. The hypothesis was formulated after data collection and before the development of the model. Comparison was conducted between arm cuff measurements, as ground truth, and results from the model, using Mean Absolute Error, Mean Squared Error, and Coefficient of Determination (R^2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Systolic pressure was measured with 9.81 Mean Absolute Error, 165.13 Mean Squared Error and 0.36 R^2. Diastolic pressure was measured with 6.00 Mean Absolute Error, 58.21 and 0.30 R^2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This model improves on existing research and shows errors comparable to the variability of hand cuff measurements. The use of fundus images to assess blood pressure may be more indicative of long-term hypertension. Additional trials in clinical settings may be necessary, as well as additional prospective studies to validate results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11741447/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.06.25320084\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.06.25320084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:本研究旨在确定是否可以开发一种机器学习模型来评估血压,其准确性可与臂袖测量相媲美。方法:基于UK Biobank数据集开发深度学习模型,并进行训练以检测收缩压和舒张压。假设是在数据收集之后,模型开发之前制定的。使用平均绝对误差(Mean Absolute Error)、均方误差(Mean Squared Error)和决定系数(Coefficient of Determination, R^2)对作为基础事实的袖带测量值与模型结果进行比较。结果:收缩压测量的平均绝对误差为9.81,平均平方误差为165.13,R^2为0.36。舒张压测量的平均绝对误差分别为6.00、58.21和0.30 R^2。结论:该模型改进了现有的研究,显示了与袖口测量可变性相当的误差。使用眼底图像评估血压可能更能指示长期高血压。可能需要在临床环境中进行额外的试验,以及额外的前瞻性研究来验证结果。
Non-Contact Optical Blood Pressure Biometry Using AI-Based Analysis of Non-Mydriatic Fundus Imaging.
Background: This study was developed to determine whether a machine learning model could be developed to assess blood pressure with accuracy comparable to arm cuff measurements.
Methods: A deep learning model was developed based on the UK Biobank dataset and was trained to detect both systolic and diastolic pressure. The hypothesis was formulated after data collection and before the development of the model. Comparison was conducted between arm cuff measurements, as ground truth, and results from the model, using Mean Absolute Error, Mean Squared Error, and Coefficient of Determination (R^2).
Results: Systolic pressure was measured with 9.81 Mean Absolute Error, 165.13 Mean Squared Error and 0.36 R^2. Diastolic pressure was measured with 6.00 Mean Absolute Error, 58.21 and 0.30 R^2.
Conclusions: This model improves on existing research and shows errors comparable to the variability of hand cuff measurements. The use of fundus images to assess blood pressure may be more indicative of long-term hypertension. Additional trials in clinical settings may be necessary, as well as additional prospective studies to validate results.